Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

AAC - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 1
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st UCF 1,616.2620 1,623.7433 1,619.9983 54.32 61.08 0.203
2nd Houston 1,576.2306 1,581.2114 1,578.7191 54.44 58.50 0.142
3rd SMU 1,552.4652 1,559.6813 1,556.0691 52.52 57.61 0.113
4th Wichita St. 1,493.1099 1,499.1787 1,496.1412 50.07 55.54 0.076
5th Cincinnati 1,462.2351 1,468.0985 1,465.1639 49.34 53.51 0.016
6th Memphis 1,444.4677 1,450.8397 1,447.6502 50.50 48.50 -0.013
7th Tulsa 1,435.6338 1,447.5637 1,441.5864 49.94 52.89 0.002
8th Tulane 1,419.3972 1,424.4597 1,421.9262 48.37 50.65 -0.019
9th East Carolina 1,413.6198 1,420.5102 1,417.0608 48.28 51.46 -0.013
10th South Fla. 1,407.7000 1,418.4815 1,413.0805 49.03 48.42 -0.006
11th Temple 1,386.8865 1,391.3895 1,389.1362 46.18 49.32 -0.062

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st UCF 0.3405 46.82 12.77 43.51 39.56 4.72 7.09
2nd Houston 0.2777 40.88 13.11 37.64 43.88 5.01 7.44
3rd SMU 0.2672 39.53 12.81 36.30 46.27 5.35 7.33
4th Wichita St. 0.2499 37.76 12.77 34.41 48.11 5.98 6.64
5th Cincinnati 0.2316 37.63 14.46 35.50 46.41 6.64 7.43
6th Tulane 0.2203 35.23 13.20 31.59 51.16 5.15 6.51
7th Tulsa 0.2203 33.66 11.63 31.06 54.14 5.10 5.71
8th East Carolina 0.2156 35.50 13.94 32.43 51.51 5.14 6.98
9th South Fla. 0.2079 37.32 16.53 34.10 46.35 6.60 6.85
10th Memphis 0.1753 32.97 15.45 30.01 52.85 5.07 5.01
11th Temple 0.1740 33.63 16.22 31.44 50.85 6.15 6.74

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Houston 0.1355 30.63 17.07 29.01 53.60 6.69 5.58
2nd UCF 0.1375 31.17 17.41 29.77 52.57 8.02 6.18
3rd SMU 0.1540 31.95 16.54 29.03 53.49 6.81 5.37
4th Wichita St. 0.1739 34.27 16.89 31.53 49.77 6.96 6.14
5th Memphis 0.1886 34.63 15.77 32.57 50.46 6.19 5.22
6th South Fla. 0.2136 37.10 15.75 34.38 47.00 6.43 7.67
7th Cincinnati 0.2156 37.33 15.77 35.15 47.43 6.04 7.30
8th Tulsa 0.2179 35.02 13.23 32.79 52.57 3.84 4.85
9th East Carolina 0.2283 38.84 16.01 36.15 44.93 6.35 6.50
10th Temple 0.2361 38.47 14.86 36.14 45.86 5.70 5.63
11th Tulane 0.2391 37.22 13.31 34.20 49.23 4.30 6.35

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,476.9574 1,470.8219 1,463.6568 1,454.4936 1,466.4824
Difference -6.1355 -13.3006 -22.4639 -13.9667

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
UCF 104 2,455 1,274 152 220 51.89 16.2 11.2 1,970 813 129 211 58.73 15.3 9.3
Houston 127 2,937 1,510 197 291 51.41 14.9 10.1 2,571 1,133 148 245 55.93 17.4 10.5
SMU 116 2,586 1,290 176 283 49.88 14.7 9.1 2,365 1,054 129 213 55.43 18.3 11.1
Wichita St. 121 2,648 1,259 153 262 47.55 17.3 10.1 2,614 1,219 159 271 53.37 16.4 9.6
Tulsa 117 2,447 1,178 123 214 48.14 19.9 11.4 2,592 1,262 127 227 51.31 20.4 11.4
Memphis 126 2,663 1,340 129 179 50.32 20.6 14.9 2,675 1,383 145 294 48.30 18.4 9.1
East Carolina 123 2,541 1,218 171 226 47.93 14.9 11.2 2,697 1,339 185 250 50.35 14.6 10.8
Cincinnati 112 2,377 1,112 159 189 46.78 14.9 12.6 2,464 1,199 185 263 51.34 13.3 9.4
Tulane 119 2,523 1,198 158 270 47.48 16.0 9.3 2,696 1,352 166 248 49.85 16.2 10.9
South Fla. 116 2,315 1,117 160 253 48.25 14.5 9.2 2,494 1,316 198 204 47.23 12.6 12.2
Temple 125 2,579 1,190 168 294 46.14 15.4 8.8 2,836 1,456 158 259 48.66 17.9 10.9
Conference Average 119 2,552 1,244 159 244 48.71 16.3 10.7 2,543 1,230 157 244 51.86 16.5 10.5
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the AAC

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

73.99

2022-11-25
UCF
Houston
3
2
20
25
25
20
25
21
19
25
15
12
GAME

73.44

2022-10-07
Houston
UCF
3
1
25
23
22
25
26
24
25
22
GAME

73.30

2022-10-07
Tulsa
SMU
2
3
25
19
20
25
23
25
25
21
12
15
GAME

73.15

2022-10-09
East Carolina
Cincinnati
3
2
23
25
27
25
19
25
25
21
15
13
GAME

72.92

2022-10-16
Memphis
Houston
0
3
24
26
25
27
23
25
GAME

72.81

2022-10-21
Houston
Wichita St.
3
2
25
20
25
27
22
25
25
18
15
11
GAME

72.78

2022-11-23
SMU
Wichita St.
2
3
25
20
24
26
25
17
19
25
12
15
GAME

72.47

2022-11-13
Tulsa
Tulane
3
2
15
25
18
25
25
23
28
26
15
13
GAME

72.29

2022-11-20
Houston
SMU
3
1
25
15
25
22
25
27
25
19
GAME

71.25

2022-10-28
Tulane
East Carolina
3
2
25
17
25
22
26
28
22
25
20
18

HuskerGeek AAC All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 26.8873
2 26.2461
3 25.3208
4 25.3021
5 24.2520
6 24.2135
7 22.9795
8 22.9358
9 22.8993
10 22.8446

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 17.7868
2 16.8296
3 15.8074
4 15.5797
5 14.6045
6 14.2736
7 14.1815
8 12.9027
9 11.9599
10 11.4502

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 21.4795
2 20.1504
3 18.5586
4 18.1346
5 14.8215
6 13.9979
7 13.5036
8 13.4140
9 12.6531
10 12.4154

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2435
2 0.2298
3 0.2202
4 0.2187
5 0.2091
6 0.2077
7 0.1981
8 0.1981
9 0.1969
10 0.1910

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1618
2 0.1520
3 0.1404
4 0.1317
5 0.1298
6 0.1288
7 0.1153
8 0.1045
9 0.1041
10 0.1028

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1691
2 0.1638
3 0.1586
4 0.1537
5 0.1238
6 0.1231
7 0.1228
8 0.1225
9 0.1217
10 0.1182


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek