Nerdly Nebraska.
2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders
Sport | School | Rating |
---|---|---|
ViPR D1 Volleyball | Wisconsin | 1,711.3731 |
Sport | School | Rating |
---|---|---|
ViPR D1 Volleyball | Wisconsin | 1,711.3731 |
Rnk. | Team | Résumé | Recent | ViPR | Adj SP% | Adj SO% | Adj. Hit Mar. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1st | Louisville | 1,692.4950 | 1,694.4209 | 1,693.4577 | 59.60 | 64.61 | 0.309 |
2nd | Georgia Tech | 1,648.8664 | 1,648.9078 | 1,648.8871 | 56.16 | 61.76 | 0.246 |
3rd | Pittsburgh | 1,638.9557 | 1,641.6919 | 1,640.3232 | 56.63 | 64.55 | 0.254 |
4th | Florida St. | 1,575.2165 | 1,581.9479 | 1,578.5786 | 58.02 | 58.26 | 0.168 |
5th | Miami (FL) | 1,564.5386 | 1,569.9912 | 1,567.2625 | 56.93 | 60.01 | 0.160 |
6th | Notre Dame | 1,563.0531 | 1,560.3756 | 1,561.7138 | 54.79 | 59.72 | 0.148 |
7th | North Carolina | 1,550.6461 | 1,554.8231 | 1,552.7332 | 54.32 | 57.88 | 0.151 |
8th | Syracuse | 1,527.7501 | 1,532.3661 | 1,530.0564 | 51.28 | 58.25 | 0.142 |
9th | NC State | 1,517.8510 | 1,517.8309 | 1,517.8410 | 51.89 | 57.06 | 0.120 |
10th | Duke | 1,501.2250 | 1,505.7016 | 1,503.4617 | 51.58 | 56.67 | 0.104 |
11th | Wake Forest | 1,492.0858 | 1,496.1135 | 1,494.0983 | 52.23 | 55.36 | 0.101 |
12th | Clemson | 1,453.2100 | 1,458.5259 | 1,455.8655 | 50.72 | 55.41 | 0.067 |
13th | Boston College | 1,433.3604 | 1,437.5750 | 1,435.4662 | 50.00 | 52.81 | 0.016 |
14th | Virginia Tech | 1,422.6637 | 1,426.4551 | 1,424.5581 | 50.91 | 51.53 | 0.017 |
15th | Virginia | 1,407.4838 | 1,415.0428 | 1,411.2583 | 49.09 | 51.15 | 0.015 |
ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.
Rnk. | Team | Hit% | Kill% | HE% | AST% | O_DIG% | O_BLK% | ACE% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1st | Louisville | 0.3657 | 48.36 | 11.78 | 43.36 | 38.08 | 4.18 | 8.47 |
2nd | Georgia Tech | 0.3613 | 48.66 | 12.53 | 44.36 | 36.64 | 4.91 | 6.90 |
3rd | Pittsburgh | 0.3561 | 48.17 | 12.56 | 44.59 | 35.34 | 6.16 | 7.98 |
4th | Syracuse | 0.3116 | 43.79 | 12.63 | 39.99 | 41.22 | 4.12 | 6.19 |
5th | North Carolina | 0.2981 | 43.69 | 13.88 | 40.25 | 40.57 | 6.02 | 7.05 |
6th | Florida St. | 0.2967 | 39.86 | 10.19 | 35.58 | 48.98 | 3.62 | 7.89 |
7th | Miami (FL) | 0.2925 | 40.58 | 11.33 | 37.52 | 46.01 | 4.15 | 6.74 |
8th | Notre Dame | 0.2782 | 38.47 | 10.65 | 34.88 | 47.54 | 4.48 | 7.68 |
9th | NC State | 0.2729 | 40.64 | 13.36 | 37.65 | 44.75 | 5.99 | 5.69 |
10th | Wake Forest | 0.2656 | 41.26 | 14.70 | 36.35 | 43.30 | 5.91 | 7.24 |
11th | Clemson | 0.2635 | 39.50 | 13.16 | 35.73 | 45.93 | 5.57 | 6.33 |
12th | Duke | 0.2563 | 38.59 | 12.96 | 34.41 | 48.57 | 4.76 | 9.16 |
13th | Boston College | 0.2317 | 38.83 | 15.66 | 35.73 | 46.42 | 6.20 | 7.11 |
14th | Virginia Tech | 0.1948 | 34.10 | 14.62 | 31.13 | 52.86 | 4.82 | 7.68 |
15th | Virginia | 0.1892 | 35.84 | 16.92 | 32.81 | 49.04 | 5.50 | 6.75 |
Rnk. | Team | O_Hit% | O_Kill% | O_HE% | O_AST% | DIG% | BLK% | O_ACE% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1st | Louisville | 0.0569 | 27.37 | 21.68 | 25.55 | 54.32 | 10.07 | 2.67 |
2nd | Pittsburgh | 0.1020 | 29.23 | 19.03 | 27.24 | 54.31 | 8.62 | 3.98 |
3rd | Georgia Tech | 0.1152 | 28.33 | 16.81 | 26.31 | 58.33 | 7.10 | 4.35 |
4th | Florida St. | 0.1286 | 29.71 | 16.85 | 27.21 | 54.37 | 6.29 | 4.55 |
5th | Notre Dame | 0.1298 | 30.54 | 17.56 | 28.83 | 52.78 | 7.57 | 4.61 |
6th | Miami (FL) | 0.1322 | 30.90 | 17.67 | 28.92 | 53.10 | 7.78 | 3.99 |
7th | North Carolina | 0.1469 | 31.53 | 16.84 | 28.61 | 52.03 | 6.78 | 4.48 |
8th | Duke | 0.1522 | 32.12 | 16.90 | 28.58 | 53.02 | 7.08 | 5.66 |
9th | NC State | 0.1530 | 31.42 | 16.12 | 29.08 | 54.80 | 6.21 | 5.52 |
10th | Wake Forest | 0.1643 | 33.39 | 16.97 | 30.02 | 50.67 | 7.25 | 5.38 |
11th | Syracuse | 0.1694 | 33.53 | 16.60 | 30.78 | 48.86 | 7.48 | 3.24 |
12th | Virginia | 0.1739 | 35.25 | 17.86 | 31.41 | 48.50 | 8.52 | 5.46 |
13th | Virginia Tech | 0.1779 | 35.16 | 17.37 | 31.85 | 47.72 | 6.87 | 5.22 |
14th | Clemson | 0.1960 | 35.25 | 15.65 | 32.12 | 49.83 | 6.05 | 6.41 |
15th | Boston College | 0.2160 | 37.04 | 15.44 | 34.14 | 48.00 | 6.33 | 4.62 |
Description | Average | Remove First and Last | Remove Top and Bottom 2 | Remove Top and Bottom 3 | Composite |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scores | 1,534.3708 | 1,531.6035 | 1,530.6728 | 1,529.0679 | 1,531.4287 |
Difference | -2.7673 | -3.6980 | -5.3029 | -3.9227 |
Offense | Defense | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Team | Sets | S | SP | SA | SE | SP% | S/SA | S/SE | OS | SPA | SAA | SEA | SO% | OS/SAA | OS/SEA |
Louisville | 113 | 2,564 | 1,350 | 190 | 248 | 52.65 | 13.5 | 10.3 | 2,033 | 830 | 75 | 256 | 59.17 | 27.1 | 7.9 |
Miami (FL) | 107 | 2,107 | 1,130 | 142 | 179 | 53.63 | 14.8 | 11.8 | 1,827 | 801 | 109 | 191 | 56.16 | 16.8 | 9.6 |
Pittsburgh | 126 | 2,729 | 1,353 | 184 | 250 | 49.58 | 14.8 | 10.9 | 2,358 | 966 | 116 | 247 | 59.03 | 20.3 | 9.5 |
Georgia Tech | 112 | 2,479 | 1,219 | 141 | 209 | 49.17 | 17.6 | 11.9 | 2,121 | 927 | 120 | 240 | 56.29 | 17.7 | 8.8 |
Florida St. | 108 | 2,308 | 1,199 | 156 | 165 | 51.95 | 14.8 | 14.0 | 2,151 | 1,003 | 120 | 216 | 53.37 | 17.9 | 10.0 |
North Carolina | 110 | 2,230 | 1,104 | 146 | 233 | 49.51 | 15.3 | 9.6 | 2,028 | 940 | 115 | 232 | 53.65 | 17.6 | 8.7 |
Notre Dame | 103 | 2,145 | 1,030 | 138 | 224 | 48.02 | 15.5 | 9.6 | 2,135 | 973 | 126 | 221 | 54.43 | 16.9 | 9.7 |
Wake Forest | 104 | 2,169 | 1,070 | 148 | 234 | 49.33 | 14.7 | 9.3 | 2,095 | 1,005 | 138 | 202 | 52.03 | 15.2 | 10.4 |
Syracuse | 109 | 2,344 | 1,097 | 133 | 196 | 46.80 | 17.6 | 12.0 | 2,222 | 1,020 | 97 | 191 | 54.10 | 22.9 | 11.6 |
Duke | 102 | 1,991 | 949 | 174 | 268 | 47.66 | 11.4 | 7.4 | 1,958 | 925 | 144 | 240 | 52.76 | 13.6 | 8.2 |
NC State | 103 | 2,139 | 1,002 | 107 | 250 | 46.84 | 20.0 | 8.6 | 2,114 | 994 | 146 | 223 | 52.98 | 14.5 | 9.5 |
Clemson | 107 | 2,094 | 990 | 122 | 276 | 47.28 | 17.2 | 7.6 | 2,222 | 1,075 | 174 | 229 | 51.62 | 12.8 | 9.7 |
Boston College | 127 | 2,468 | 1,169 | 175 | 205 | 47.37 | 14.1 | 12.0 | 2,574 | 1,285 | 147 | 254 | 50.08 | 17.5 | 10.1 |
Virginia Tech | 113 | 1,797 | 857 | 152 | 226 | 47.69 | 11.8 | 8.0 | 1,961 | 1,017 | 151 | 229 | 48.14 | 13.0 | 8.6 |
Virginia | 100 | 1,791 | 822 | 118 | 257 | 45.90 | 15.2 | 7.0 | 2,008 | 1,054 | 136 | 208 | 47.51 | 14.8 | 9.7 |
Conference Average | 110 | 2,224 | 1,089 | 148 | 228 | 48.89 | 15.2 | 10.0 | 2,120 | 988 | 128 | 225 | 53.42 | 17.2 | 9.5 |
|
|
|
Game Link | EPIC | Game Date | Location | Teams | Sets | Set 1 | Set 2 | Set 3 | Set 4 | Set 5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GAME |
78.45 |
2021-10-31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
77.04 |
2021-10-10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
76.26 |
2021-11-12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
GAME |
76.06 |
2021-10-01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
75.96 |
2021-10-24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
75.36 |
2021-12-11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
GAME |
75.34 |
2021-10-03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
GAME |
75.29 |
2021-11-07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
75.21 |
2021-11-19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
74.70 |
2021-11-21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Name | Team |
---|---|---|
1 | Mariana Brambilla | Georgia Tech |
2 | Tori Dilfer | Louisville |
3 | Julia Bergmann | Georgia Tech |
4 | Anna Stevenson | Louisville |
5 | Lily Tessier | Florida St. |
Rank | Name | Team |
---|---|---|
1 | Mariana Brambilla | Georgia Tech |
2 | Julia Bergmann | Georgia Tech |
3 | Anna Stevenson | Louisville |
4 | Anna DeBeer | Louisville |
5 | Leketor Member-Meneh | Pittsburgh |
Rank | Name | Team |
---|---|---|
1 | Tori Dilfer | Louisville |
2 | Lily Tessier | Florida St. |
3 | Savannah Vach | Miami (FL) |
4 | Matti McKissock | Georgia Tech |
5 | Zoe Nunez | Notre Dame |
Rank | Name | Team |
---|---|---|
1 | Elena Scott | Louisville |
2 | Lauren Hogan | Syracuse |
3 | Hattie Monson | Notre Dame |
4 | Ashley Browske | Pittsburgh |
5 | Priscilla Hernandez | Miami (FL) |
Rk. | Name | Team | WPA |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Mariana Brambilla | Georgia Tech | 23.9262 |
2 | Julia Bergmann | Georgia Tech | 23.8858 |
3 | Polina Shemanova | Syracuse | 22.8316 |
4 | Savannah Vach | Miami (FL) | 22.0485 |
5 | Tori Dilfer | Louisville | 21.7448 |
6 | Marina Markova | Syracuse | 21.6804 |
7 | Clare Naughton | Boston College | 21.4073 |
8 | Lily Tessier | Florida St. | 21.4066 |
9 | Leketor Member-Meneh | Pittsburgh | 20.5127 |
10 | Elena Karakasi | Syracuse | 20.5108 |
Rk. | Name | Team | OWPA |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Tori Dilfer | Louisville | 15.9982 |
2 | Julia Bergmann | Georgia Tech | 15.0466 |
3 | Savannah Vach | Miami (FL) | 14.2448 |
4 | Matti McKissock | Georgia Tech | 13.8711 |
5 | Andrea Fuentes | Wake Forest | 13.6311 |
6 | Mariana Brambilla | Georgia Tech | 13.5927 |
7 | Marina Markova | Syracuse | 13.5756 |
8 | Elena Karakasi | Syracuse | 13.1824 |
9 | Lily Tessier | Florida St. | 13.1591 |
10 | Chinaza Ndee | Pittsburgh | 12.0960 |
Rk. | Name | Team | DWPA |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Anna Murphy | Boston College | 14.1150 |
2 | Kalani Whillock | Wake Forest | 13.3337 |
3 | Mackenzie Cole | Duke | 12.1933 |
4 | Hattie Monson | Notre Dame | 12.0558 |
5 | Polina Shemanova | Syracuse | 11.9586 |
6 | Emery Dupes | Florida St. | 11.6970 |
7 | Priscilla Hernandez | Miami (FL) | 11.3320 |
8 | Elena Scott | Louisville | 11.1829 |
9 | Ashley Browske | Pittsburgh | 10.6941 |
10 | Mariana Brambilla | Georgia Tech | 10.3334 |
Rk. | Name | Team | WPA/S |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Savannah Vach | Miami (FL) | 0.2534 |
2 | Mariana Brambilla | Georgia Tech | 0.2279 |
3 | Julia Bergmann | Georgia Tech | 0.2275 |
4 | Lily Tessier | Florida St. | 0.2207 |
5 | Polina Shemanova | Syracuse | 0.2174 |
6 | Marina Markova | Syracuse | 0.2065 |
7 | Tori Dilfer | Louisville | 0.2032 |
8 | Andrea Fuentes | Wake Forest | 0.2010 |
9 | Elena Karakasi | Syracuse | 0.1972 |
10 | Kamryn Malloy | Wake Forest | 0.1937 |
Rk. | Name | Team | OWPA/S |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Savannah Vach | Miami (FL) | 0.1637 |
2 | Tori Dilfer | Louisville | 0.1495 |
3 | Julia Bergmann | Georgia Tech | 0.1433 |
4 | Andrea Fuentes | Wake Forest | 0.1405 |
5 | Lily Tessier | Florida St. | 0.1357 |
6 | Matti McKissock | Georgia Tech | 0.1334 |
7 | Angela Grieve | Miami (FL) | 0.1321 |
8 | Mariana Brambilla | Georgia Tech | 0.1295 |
9 | Marina Markova | Syracuse | 0.1293 |
10 | Elena Karakasi | Syracuse | 0.1268 |
Rk. | Name | Team | DWPA/S |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Lauren Hogan | Syracuse | 0.1391 |
2 | Kalani Whillock | Wake Forest | 0.1389 |
3 | Mackenzie Cole | Duke | 0.1340 |
4 | Priscilla Hernandez | Miami (FL) | 0.1259 |
5 | Anna Murphy | Boston College | 0.1249 |
6 | Hattie Monson | Notre Dame | 0.1218 |
7 | Karenna Wurl | North Carolina | 0.1174 |
8 | Polina Shemanova | Syracuse | 0.1139 |
9 | Kaylee Frazier | NC State | 0.1126 |
10 | Emery Dupes | Florida St. | 0.1125 |
Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts. The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams. This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams. The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores. It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams. The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average. If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating. If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings. It was weighing the average down so to speak. The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.
The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game. EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.
All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them. This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.
Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list. Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric. Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.