Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

AMCC - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Penn St.-Behrend 1,446.9777 1,444.2308 1,445.6036 60.57 52.62 0.131
2nd Pitt.-Bradford 1,353.9726 1,357.5315 1,355.7509 56.28 45.12 0.027
3rd Penn St.-Altoona 1,354.7146 1,355.5881 1,355.1513 57.52 42.95 0.000
4th Alfred St. 1,339.1240 1,332.0048 1,335.5597 56.34 47.38 0.047
5th La Roche 1,196.4096 1,193.6662 1,195.0371 46.87 41.33 -0.110
6th Medaille 1,168.7331 1,168.5037 1,168.6184 49.19 37.44 -0.190
7th Mount Aloysius 1,155.1762 1,155.1927 1,155.1844 50.86 37.12 -0.146
8th Pitt.-Greensburg 1,121.9073 1,126.5042 1,124.2034 52.67 36.71 -0.236
9th Hilbert 896.0089 894.1123 895.0601 46.38 25.85 -0.418

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Penn St.-Behrend 0.2364 35.80 12.17 32.76 51.94 3.92 10.94
2nd Alfred St. 0.1999 35.50 15.51 31.93 50.46 4.64 12.54
3rd Pitt.-Bradford 0.1755 32.33 14.79 28.91 53.61 4.86 7.81
4th Penn St.-Altoona 0.1384 29.40 15.56 26.29 55.23 3.76 7.25
5th Mount Aloysius 0.0836 25.98 17.62 23.49 62.46 4.96 7.50
6th La Roche 0.0736 24.04 16.68 21.79 61.81 4.36 7.81
7th Medaille 0.0576 24.30 18.54 21.58 60.67 4.67 8.63
8th Pitt.-Greensburg 0.0193 22.00 20.07 20.17 62.07 5.15 9.40
9th Hilbert -0.1094 13.84 24.78 11.93 71.81 3.99 2.69

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Penn St.-Behrend 0.1058 29.16 18.58 27.10 57.58 4.68 8.39
2nd Penn St.-Altoona 0.1387 29.69 15.82 27.56 56.22 2.12 6.45
3rd Pitt.-Bradford 0.1481 31.21 16.40 28.27 56.22 4.08 9.62
4th Alfred St. 0.1530 33.73 18.43 31.18 50.43 4.29 11.45
5th La Roche 0.1836 33.25 14.88 30.16 51.50 3.74 11.33
6th Mount Aloysius 0.2299 37.80 14.81 35.08 48.81 3.67 13.48
7th Medaille 0.2472 36.92 12.20 33.20 51.53 1.76 10.93
8th Pitt.-Greensburg 0.2557 39.64 14.07 35.04 43.13 1.98 11.51
9th Hilbert 0.3083 43.89 13.06 38.03 39.80 1.96 18.02

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,225.5743 1,241.3579 1,241.9102 1,233.0717 1,235.4785
Difference 15.7836 16.3359 7.4974 13.2056

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Penn St.-Behrend 92 1,603 1,004 272 224 62.63 5.9 7.2 1,247 592 162 152 52.53 7.7 8.2
Alfred St. 70 1,546 972 244 208 62.87 6.3 7.4 1,248 640 141 107 48.72 8.9 11.7
Penn St.-Altoona 73 1,530 961 152 120 62.81 10.1 12.8 1,288 729 93 120 43.40 13.8 10.7
Pitt.-Bradford 85 1,589 960 174 140 60.42 9.1 11.4 1,417 784 155 161 44.67 9.1 8.8
Medaille 70 1,323 729 144 185 55.10 9.2 7.2 1,500 922 173 146 38.53 8.7 10.3
Pitt.-Greensburg 73 1,234 694 128 106 56.24 9.6 11.6 1,632 1,040 190 190 36.28 8.6 8.6
La Roche 73 1,338 691 133 160 51.64 10.1 8.4 1,520 903 181 180 40.59 8.4 8.4
Mount Aloysius 71 1,203 658 112 107 54.70 10.7 11.2 1,489 946 229 156 36.47 6.5 9.5
Hilbert 60 695 359 38 106 51.66 18.3 6.6 1,328 968 270 140 27.11 4.9 9.5
Conference Average 74 1,340 781 155 151 57.56 9.9 9.3 1,408 836 177 150 40.92 8.5 9.5
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the AMCC

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

62.90

2021-11-06 Erie, PA
Alfred St.
Penn St.-Altoona
3
0
25
20
27
25
25
19
GAME

62.54

2021-10-09
Penn St.-Behrend
Penn St.-Altoona
3
0
25
21
25
10
25
23
GAME

62.23

2021-11-06
Penn St.-Behrend
Pitt.-Bradford
3
0
27
25
25
17
25
12
GAME

61.51

2021-10-06
Pitt.-Bradford
Penn St.-Behrend
0
3
19
25
19
25
12
25
GAME

61.27

2021-10-20
Penn St.-Behrend
Alfred St.
3
0
25
16
25
23
25
16
GAME

61.14

2021-10-16
Penn St.-Altoona
Pitt.-Bradford
3
1
25
11
17
25
25
17
25
20
GAME

58.74

2021-10-16
La Roche
Penn St.-Behrend
1
3
25
19
20
25
22
25
17
25
GAME

58.31

2021-11-07
Penn St.-Behrend
Alfred St.
3
0
25
17
25
15
25
14
GAME

58.15

2021-10-30
Alfred St.
Pitt.-Bradford
3
0
25
22
25
19
25
22
GAME

56.27

2021-11-03
Pitt.-Bradford
La Roche
3
1
25
15
25
11
24
26
25
13

HuskerGeek AMCC All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 14.3423
2 12.4561
3 11.7322
4 11.2646
5 11.0639
6 10.8948
7 10.5273
8 10.1092
9 9.5817
10 8.7322

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 8.8002
2 7.9811
3 7.5136
4 7.4221
5 6.8830
6 5.9998
7 5.6696
8 5.4363
9 4.8912
10 4.0906

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 11.0293
2 9.6379
3 8.0367
4 7.6643
5 7.3850
6 6.5415
7 6.3612
8 6.3018
9 5.8283
10 5.6527

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2048
2 0.2020
3 0.1955
4 0.1887
5 0.1698
6 0.1676
7 0.1651
8 0.1501
9 0.1474
10 0.1444

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1467
2 0.1142
3 0.1138
4 0.1124
5 0.1027
6 0.0988
7 0.0872
8 0.0845
9 0.0764
10 0.0593

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1576
2 0.1554
3 0.1256
4 0.1191
5 0.1161
6 0.1112
7 0.1087
8 0.1060
9 0.0983
10 0.0976


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek