Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

AMCC - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Penn St.-Behrend 1,317.6848 1,312.9285 1,315.3045 55.41 46.57 0.030
2nd Penn St.-Altoona 1,311.8414 1,305.6835 1,308.7589 54.47 47.70 -0.028
3rd Alfred St. 1,306.1872 1,292.9733 1,299.5635 56.41 45.14 -0.003
4th Pitt.-Bradford 1,273.5329 1,272.7940 1,273.1634 53.50 42.49 -0.050
5th Mount Aloysius 1,210.4338 1,208.7760 1,209.6046 52.51 39.42 -0.064
6th La Roche 1,189.7586 1,187.5129 1,188.6352 50.90 38.83 -0.092
7th Pitt.-Greensburg 1,102.1038 1,102.3208 1,102.2123 52.19 33.43 -0.182
8th Hilbert 1,007.9439 1,008.9731 1,008.4584 44.26 32.08 -0.291

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Penn St.-Behrend 0.2018 33.11 12.93 30.40 54.15 3.65 8.86
2nd Alfred St. 0.1679 31.04 14.25 27.93 53.72 5.04 11.23
3rd Penn St.-Altoona 0.1351 28.42 14.91 26.14 59.43 4.06 6.89
4th Mount Aloysius 0.1314 30.07 16.92 28.18 56.84 4.86 8.21
5th Pitt.-Bradford 0.1251 29.67 17.15 28.18 53.99 5.71 8.61
6th La Roche 0.0817 23.25 15.07 21.15 61.46 4.11 7.37
7th Pitt.-Greensburg 0.0466 22.04 17.38 20.49 60.37 4.10 5.57
8th Hilbert -0.0049 22.02 22.50 19.73 62.86 4.93 6.71

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Penn St.-Altoona 0.1630 31.66 15.36 29.31 55.40 3.13 6.93
2nd Alfred St. 0.1706 33.95 16.89 30.82 49.82 3.08 11.74
3rd Penn St.-Behrend 0.1715 32.30 15.15 29.34 52.91 3.00 9.43
4th La Roche 0.1734 31.80 14.46 28.79 50.81 4.79 10.45
5th Pitt.-Bradford 0.1751 32.53 15.02 30.35 53.11 3.54 9.28
6th Mount Aloysius 0.1950 35.22 15.73 32.47 50.64 3.58 12.39
7th Pitt.-Greensburg 0.2288 36.62 13.74 32.71 46.00 1.67 11.30
8th Hilbert 0.2857 42.42 13.86 38.51 42.21 2.64 15.35

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,213.2126 1,230.3230 1,242.7417 1,241.3840 1,231.9153
Difference 17.1104 29.5291 28.1714 24.9370

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Alfred St. 101 1,995 1,229 294 264 61.60 6.8 7.6 1,731 912 225 163 47.31 7.7 10.6
Penn St.-Altoona 93 1,696 973 165 124 57.37 10.3 13.7 1,619 854 136 187 47.25 11.9 8.7
Penn St.-Behrend 107 2,282 1,312 205 272 57.49 11.1 8.4 2,211 1,210 211 182 45.27 10.5 12.1
Pitt.-Bradford 97 1,812 1,027 186 162 56.68 9.7 11.2 1,830 1,051 187 186 42.57 9.8 9.8
La Roche 88 1,881 1,100 181 188 58.48 10.4 10.0 1,892 1,138 171 183 39.85 11.1 10.3
Mount Aloysius 104 2,162 1,259 205 172 58.23 10.5 12.6 2,225 1,341 258 196 39.73 8.6 11.4
Pitt.-Greensburg 63 1,169 666 74 90 56.97 15.8 13.0 1,521 999 155 100 34.32 9.8 15.2
Hilbert 88 1,500 796 175 193 53.07 8.6 7.8 1,961 1,273 284 201 35.08 6.9 9.8
Conference Average 93 1,812 1,045 186 183 57.49 10.4 10.5 1,874 1,097 203 175 41.42 9.5 11.0
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the AMCC

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

67.69

2022-10-15
Penn St.-Behrend
Penn St.-Altoona
2
3
25
27
25
19
25
22
18
25
17
19
GAME

64.43

2022-10-22
Pitt.-Bradford
Penn St.-Altoona
3
1
16
25
25
12
27
25
26
24
GAME

61.55

2022-10-29
Penn St.-Altoona
Alfred St.
2
3
25
17
22
25
15
25
25
20
13
15
GAME

59.56

2022-10-07
La Roche
Penn St.-Behrend
1
3
20
25
18
25
25
18
22
24
GAME

59.07

2022-10-08
Mount Aloysius
Pitt.-Bradford
3
2
22
25
25
23
13
25
25
22
15
12
GAME

59.07

2022-10-26
Penn St.-Altoona
La Roche
3
1
22
25
25
18
25
14
25
19
GAME

59.01

2022-10-26
Penn St.-Behrend
Pitt.-Bradford
3
1
25
19
25
22
22
25
25
7
GAME

58.96

2022-11-05
Alfred St.
Penn St.-Altoona
3
2
25
20
19
25
25
18
21
25
15
12
GAME

58.65

2022-11-06
Alfred St.
Penn St.-Behrend
3
0
25
23
25
19
25
21
GAME

58.20

2022-10-12
Alfred St.
Penn St.-Behrend
3
0
25
23
25
23
25
19

HuskerGeek AMCC All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 19.2276
2 16.8113
3 15.8068
4 15.7933
5 15.7106
6 15.2407
7 14.8694
8 13.7651
9 12.6128
10 12.5847

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 9.2849
2 9.1519
3 9.0240
4 7.7339
5 7.6104
6 6.8268
7 6.5025
8 6.3943
9 5.9187
10 5.7790

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 11.7736
2 11.7637
3 11.6203
4 10.4170
5 10.0410
6 9.9427
7 9.8297
8 9.7919
9 8.9666
10 8.2931

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2182
2 0.2078
3 0.1979
4 0.1867
5 0.1860
6 0.1690
7 0.1656
8 0.1616
9 0.1605
10 0.1601

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1189
2 0.1062
3 0.0901
4 0.0898
5 0.0879
6 0.0865
7 0.0856
8 0.0822
9 0.0722
10 0.0670

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1529
2 0.1384
3 0.1360
4 0.1210
5 0.1180
6 0.1128
7 0.1002
8 0.0976
9 0.0975
10 0.0967


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek