Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

ASC - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Mary Hardin-Baylor 1,497.2253 1,493.0906 1,495.1565 61.74 59.55 0.003
2nd Texas-Dallas 1,461.6204 1,458.1449 1,459.8816 58.63 54.87 0.023
3rd Concordia (TX) 1,442.8526 1,438.2085 1,440.5287 56.33 54.32 -0.045
4th McMurry 1,422.2867 1,418.3890 1,420.3365 59.02 51.80 -0.083
5th LeTourneau 1,400.2228 1,397.1712 1,398.6962 59.21 51.08 -0.044
6th Hardin-Simmons 1,362.9715 1,359.1565 1,361.0626 56.12 49.79 -0.105
7th Sul Ross St. 1,352.7066 1,348.9651 1,350.8346 56.26 51.56 -0.154
8th East Tex. Baptist 1,280.2671 1,277.3325 1,278.7990 55.45 45.53 -0.144
9th Howard Payne 1,197.4219 1,193.8751 1,195.6472 53.37 43.06 -0.259
10th Belhaven 1,189.4551 1,185.9036 1,187.6780 53.22 45.11 -0.236
11th Louisiana Col. 1,164.4859 1,161.4001 1,162.9420 51.24 44.62 -0.221

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Texas-Dallas 0.2576 33.30 7.53 33.30 49.03 3.01 10.38
2nd Mary Hardin-Baylor 0.2546 29.10 3.64 29.53 56.86 1.60 10.45
3rd Concordia (TX) 0.2253 32.09 9.55 31.03 51.66 2.04 10.53
4th LeTourneau 0.2205 28.15 6.10 27.39 55.36 2.23 9.67
5th Sul Ross St. 0.2031 28.10 7.80 26.98 54.69 4.05 12.12
6th McMurry 0.1977 28.11 8.35 26.31 54.22 2.69 12.88
7th Hardin-Simmons 0.1792 26.29 8.37 25.84 52.94 2.24 12.51
8th Louisiana Col. 0.1558 25.04 9.46 25.08 59.39 3.06 9.74
9th Belhaven 0.1514 22.52 7.37 20.89 61.15 3.16 11.01
10th East Tex. Baptist 0.1483 23.75 8.92 22.17 57.88 2.56 8.66
11th Howard Payne 0.1055 20.73 10.18 20.41 61.37 2.28 11.14

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Texas-Dallas 0.2349 31.48 7.99 28.28 56.26 7.37 2.55
2nd Mary Hardin-Baylor 0.2520 32.34 7.14 28.68 56.21 6.99 1.54
3rd LeTourneau 0.2646 34.68 8.22 30.15 50.51 6.98 5.95
4th Concordia (TX) 0.2699 33.51 6.52 28.80 57.32 5.85 2.79
5th McMurry 0.2809 35.12 7.03 29.59 50.50 6.89 3.14
6th Hardin-Simmons 0.2843 33.62 5.20 28.87 49.98 5.79 4.13
7th East Tex. Baptist 0.2920 36.72 7.52 31.03 46.52 6.60 3.90
8th Sul Ross St. 0.3572 40.93 5.21 36.16 47.52 5.21 5.14
9th Howard Payne 0.3644 41.29 4.84 36.30 44.86 5.00 5.88
10th Louisiana Col. 0.3771 42.51 4.79 37.26 45.60 5.10 6.46
11th Belhaven 0.3869 43.82 5.13 37.74 41.79 5.37 9.72

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,341.0512 1,343.7183 1,349.4150 1,361.9458 1,349.0325
Difference 2.6671 8.3638 20.8946 10.6418

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Mary Hardin-Baylor 57 1,368 849 100 86 62.06 13.7 15.9 1,097 518 68 104 52.78 16.1 10.5
Texas-Dallas 52 1,236 748 111 123 60.52 11.1 10.0 960 494 49 78 48.54 19.6 12.3
LeTourneau 65 1,484 914 116 67 61.59 12.8 22.1 1,271 692 114 125 45.56 11.1 10.2
Concordia (TX) 41 922 522 69 84 56.62 13.4 11.0 792 416 53 69 47.48 14.9 11.5
McMurry 65 1,422 822 140 85 57.81 10.2 16.7 1,316 736 95 102 44.07 13.9 12.9
Sul Ross St. 60 1,195 677 106 92 56.65 11.3 13.0 1,215 675 118 112 44.44 10.3 10.8
East Tex. Baptist 70 1,252 711 104 112 56.79 12.0 11.2 1,319 796 100 127 39.65 13.2 10.4
Hardin-Simmons 65 1,251 674 121 150 53.88 10.3 8.3 1,313 768 116 99 41.51 11.3 13.3
Belhaven 51 834 450 75 80 53.96 11.1 10.4 1,069 664 134 121 37.89 8.0 8.8
Louisiana Col. 46 850 453 67 129 53.29 12.7 6.6 1,076 668 95 64 37.92 11.3 16.8
Howard Payne 57 972 483 70 99 49.69 13.9 9.8 1,390 905 142 108 34.89 9.8 12.9
Conference Average 57 1,162 664 98 101 56.62 12.0 12.3 1,165 667 99 101 43.16 12.7 11.9
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the ASC

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

69.49

2021-03-20
McMurry
Mary Hardin-Baylor
1
3
25
23
25
27
26
28
15
25
GAME

68.71

2021-04-10
Mary Hardin-Baylor
Texas-Dallas
3
0
25
20
25
18
25
19
GAME

68.51

2021-04-09 Belton, TX
LeTourneau
McMurry
2
3
25
21
31
33
25
21
20
25
11
15
GAME

68.38

2021-03-27
Sul Ross St.
McMurry
2
3
28
26
21
25
18
25
25
23
10
15
GAME

67.85

2021-04-09 Belton, TX
Texas-Dallas
Concordia (TX)
3
2
25
23
23
25
21
25
25
12
15
9
GAME

66.60

2021-03-20
McMurry
Mary Hardin-Baylor
3
0
25
19
25
21
25
23
GAME

66.38

2021-03-09
Concordia (TX)
Mary Hardin-Baylor
1
3
25
20
20
25
21
25
18
25
GAME

66.17

2021-04-09
Mary Hardin-Baylor
McMurry
3
0
25
14
25
22
28
26
GAME

65.83

2021-03-03
Mary Hardin-Baylor
McMurry
3
0
25
20
26
24
25
22
GAME

65.10

2021-02-09
McMurry
Sul Ross St.
3
1
25
18
25
13
20
25
27
25

HuskerGeek ASC All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 12.9899
2 12.3271
3 11.7356
4 11.2248
5 10.7228
6 10.5065
7 9.7838
8 9.5343
9 9.5322
10 9.4873

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 7.8830
2 6.3476
3 5.8381
4 5.4200
5 5.2901
6 5.2832
7 4.8433
8 4.4736
9 4.4620
10 4.4493

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 10.6443
2 9.8148
3 9.3757
4 9.3023
5 8.5279
6 7.7523
7 7.4957
8 6.6636
9 6.4890
10 6.3312

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2331
2 0.2279
3 0.2148
4 0.2072
5 0.1956
6 0.1896
7 0.1823
8 0.1787
9 0.1727
10 0.1656

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1321
2 0.1314
3 0.1101
4 0.1053
5 0.0980
6 0.0977
7 0.0934
8 0.0898
9 0.0858
10 0.0856

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1638
2 0.1563
3 0.1550
4 0.1514
5 0.1510
6 0.1496
7 0.1388
8 0.1249
9 0.1230
10 0.1193


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek