Nerdly Nebraska.

2021-2022 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Louisville 1,717.9455

Football georgia 12.7744
Men's Soccer new hampshire 10.6445
Women's Soccer north carolina 11.4036
Women's Volleyball wisconsin 12.1463
Field Hockey penn st 9.6697

ASC - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Mary Hardin-Baylor 1,641.3627 1,678.3290 1,659.7429 73.23 65.58 0.040
2nd Texas-Dallas 1,504.0502 1,508.5347 1,506.2908 66.62 73.45 -0.024
3rd East Tex. Baptist 1,442.5034 1,449.6183 1,446.0565 68.23 56.29 -0.068
4th Sul Ross St. 1,414.0882 1,421.0626 1,417.5711 64.29 60.97 -0.075
5th Concordia (TX) 1,384.0764 1,397.2721 1,390.6586 66.62 56.38 -0.121
6th LeTourneau 1,385.2662 1,389.6132 1,387.4380 52.81 59.15 -0.098
7th Hardin-Simmons 1,381.0940 1,388.3991 1,384.7417 65.65 61.94 -0.080
8th McMurry 1,372.8576 1,380.0632 1,376.4557 64.63 58.01 -0.139
9th Howard Payne 1,292.3781 1,297.2178 1,294.7957 65.61 51.67 -0.170
10th Belhaven 1,285.7645 1,292.8074 1,289.2811 63.42 52.57 -0.158

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Mary Hardin-Baylor 0.2787 30.16 2.29 28.56 58.53 4.56 6.77
2nd Sul Ross St. 0.2402 31.16 7.14 28.49 55.32 7.13 6.90
3rd Hardin-Simmons 0.2377 31.34 7.57 28.00 51.53 6.22 7.82
4th Texas-Dallas 0.2370 32.27 8.57 30.08 53.39 6.46 7.61
5th Concordia (TX) 0.1932 30.63 11.31 28.38 53.38 6.97 9.00
6th East Tex. Baptist 0.1850 26.92 8.42 24.56 57.36 6.40 7.18
7th LeTourneau 0.1833 25.88 7.55 24.05 57.78 5.58 3.28
8th McMurry 0.1799 28.57 10.59 25.06 57.59 6.49 7.86
9th Howard Payne 0.1687 24.76 7.89 23.08 58.13 4.96 5.08
10th Belhaven 0.1199 24.20 12.21 21.89 64.60 6.88 5.32

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Mary Hardin-Baylor 0.2388 31.32 7.44 28.77 53.56 2.21 7.58
2nd East Tex. Baptist 0.2534 32.81 7.47 29.76 49.97 4.44 8.91
3rd Texas-Dallas 0.2609 33.09 7.00 29.86 53.22 3.18 7.42
4th Belhaven 0.2779 37.77 9.98 34.34 46.45 3.88 14.00
5th LeTourneau 0.2816 35.01 6.85 31.93 47.67 3.56 10.62
6th Concordia (TX) 0.3139 37.33 5.95 33.66 48.25 2.26 9.56
7th Sul Ross St. 0.3155 38.17 6.63 35.07 46.18 2.84 10.36
8th Hardin-Simmons 0.3174 35.60 3.86 31.98 46.02 2.73 10.42
9th McMurry 0.3185 38.13 6.28 34.58 46.41 3.96 9.41
10th Howard Payne 0.3383 38.51 4.68 34.49 40.99 2.06 12.92

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,415.3032 1,400.5010 1,400.4869 1,395.1024 1,402.8484
Difference -14.8022 -14.8163 -20.2009 -16.6064

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Mary Hardin-Baylor 39 801 508 87 40 63.42 9.2 20.0 581 271 37 57 53.36 15.7 10.2
Texas-Dallas 48 888 469 100 108 52.82 8.9 8.2 1,233 489 74 96 60.34 16.7 12.8
Sul Ross St. 41 618 341 69 60 55.18 9.0 10.3 605 319 80 51 47.27 7.6 11.9
Hardin-Simmons 26 502 277 50 62 55.18 10.0 8.1 495 262 55 43 47.07 9.0 11.5
East Tex. Baptist 43 903 509 80 71 56.37 11.3 12.7 916 534 69 86 41.70 13.3 10.7
McMurry 32 690 360 66 56 52.17 10.5 12.3 721 392 61 65 45.63 11.8 11.1
Concordia (TX) 41 756 392 80 68 51.85 9.5 11.1 858 510 85 71 40.56 10.1 12.1
Howard Payne 42 678 360 57 73 53.10 11.9 9.3 845 520 110 76 38.46 7.7 11.1
Belhaven 48 842 452 75 109 53.68 11.2 7.7 1,015 633 139 91 37.64 7.3 11.2
LeTourneau 44 1,136 452 54 50 39.79 21.0 22.7 775 438 98 81 43.48 7.9 9.6
Conference Average 40 781 412 72 70 53.36 11.2 12.3 804 437 81 72 45.55 10.7 11.2
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the ASC

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

78.21

2021-09-17
Texas-Dallas
Mary Hardin-Baylor
1
3
20
25
18
25
28
26
27
29
GAME

71.36

2021-09-18
LeTourneau
Mary Hardin-Baylor
1
3
17
25
25
17
12
25
21
25
GAME

68.98

2021-09-14
LeTourneau
East Tex. Baptist
3
2
20
25
27
25
24
26
26
24
15
13
GAME

68.17

2021-09-18
East Tex. Baptist
Sul Ross St.
3
2
16
25
25
23
20
25
26
24
15
10
GAME

68.10

2021-09-10
Mary Hardin-Baylor
East Tex. Baptist
3
1
21
25
25
16
25
18
25
18
GAME

67.49

2021-09-21
Hardin-Simmons
Texas-Dallas
3
1
25
23
22
25
26
24
25
22
GAME

66.75

2021-09-07
Sul Ross St.
Mary Hardin-Baylor
0
3
19
25
20
25
21
25
GAME

64.75

2021-09-18
Hardin-Simmons
McMurry
2
3
25
12
25
19
23
25
26
28
13
15
GAME

63.45

2021-09-24
Howard Payne
LeTourneau
2
3
22
25
25
18
25
27
25
21
7
15
GAME

63.29

2021-09-11
Sul Ross St.
McMurry
3
2
25
19
25
15
20
25
23
25
15
8

HuskerGeek ASC All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 8.2835
2 6.3388
3 6.1416
4 5.7787
5 5.4001
6 5.2302
7 5.2269
8 4.9568
9 4.8280
10 4.7571

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 4.3813
2 3.2355
3 3.1746
4 3.0754
5 2.9354
6 2.9160
7 2.6668
8 2.3607
9 2.3297
10 2.2681

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 7.1714
2 5.4179
3 5.2721
4 4.3478
5 4.3036
6 3.8196
7 3.5097
8 3.2634
9 3.2369
10 3.1417

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.1972
2 0.1806
3 0.1780
4 0.1749
5 0.1742
6 0.1720
7 0.1668
8 0.1633
9 0.1631
10 0.1599

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1289
2 0.1122
3 0.0924
4 0.0917
5 0.0888
6 0.0872
7 0.0860
8 0.0860
9 0.0819
10 0.0809

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1707
2 0.1598
3 0.1464
4 0.1457
5 0.1345
6 0.1175
7 0.1055
8 0.1032
9 0.1023
10 0.1005


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek