Nerdly Nebraska.

2021-2022 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,694.2539

Football georgia 11.9216
Men's Basketball arizona 10.5146
Women's Basketball south carolina 11.2365
Ice Hockey minnesota st 8.1338
Men's Soccer washington 9.3221
Women's Soccer florida st 10.8390
Men's Volleyball hawaii 9.0598
Women's Volleyball louisville 11.6893
Field Hockey iowa 10.0663

ASC - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Mary Hardin-Baylor 1,597.0911 1,614.6143 1,605.8288 65.51 56.07 0.203
2nd Texas-Dallas 1,551.1717 1,546.8205 1,548.9946 59.69 60.79 0.182
3rd Sul Ross St. 1,469.8310 1,467.2314 1,468.5306 56.59 53.00 0.097
4th East Tex. Baptist 1,453.6616 1,454.6225 1,454.1419 60.77 47.14 0.109
5th LeTourneau 1,451.7142 1,448.1351 1,449.9235 53.19 49.63 0.109
6th Hardin-Simmons 1,444.8657 1,446.1050 1,445.4852 57.67 50.05 0.113
7th McMurry 1,435.8635 1,430.9744 1,433.4169 58.53 48.19 0.074
8th Concordia (TX) 1,429.4092 1,427.6033 1,428.5060 55.62 49.42 0.094
9th Belhaven 1,297.7133 1,299.1879 1,298.4504 55.70 40.56 0.004
10th Howard Payne 1,272.2717 1,276.1240 1,274.1964 54.32 42.74 -0.027

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Mary Hardin-Baylor 0.2764 36.47 8.83 33.55 51.84 2.75 9.67
2nd Texas-Dallas 0.2611 39.83 13.72 37.16 46.15 4.00 10.59
3rd Sul Ross St. 0.2412 37.92 13.80 34.76 48.41 4.62 10.12
4th Hardin-Simmons 0.2290 36.47 13.57 33.47 48.83 4.36 10.39
5th LeTourneau 0.2180 35.02 13.22 32.50 50.41 3.55 7.50
6th Concordia (TX) 0.2130 37.86 16.56 35.30 46.14 4.25 9.47
7th McMurry 0.1931 33.79 14.49 30.28 52.05 3.54 11.34
8th East Tex. Baptist 0.1897 32.87 13.90 29.85 49.17 3.15 9.66
9th Howard Payne 0.1512 29.48 14.36 27.42 56.43 3.16 7.82
10th Belhaven 0.1210 30.07 17.97 27.26 57.45 4.44 8.29

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Mary Hardin-Baylor 0.0734 25.06 17.71 23.05 61.42 4.52 4.74
2nd Texas-Dallas 0.0789 25.24 17.35 23.12 61.18 4.81 5.11
3rd East Tex. Baptist 0.0803 25.03 17.01 22.85 56.35 5.55 6.26
4th LeTourneau 0.1091 27.41 16.50 24.88 57.77 5.55 8.36
5th Hardin-Simmons 0.1162 26.89 15.27 24.82 56.95 4.90 7.43
6th Belhaven 0.1174 31.06 19.33 28.52 53.24 5.43 11.80
7th McMurry 0.1186 28.40 16.53 26.06 55.66 5.45 6.98
8th Concordia (TX) 0.1187 28.68 16.81 25.84 57.63 4.09 7.26
9th Sul Ross St. 0.1444 30.94 16.51 29.08 55.32 4.56 7.21
10th Howard Payne 0.1785 32.75 14.91 30.34 49.36 3.81 10.79

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,440.7474 1,440.9311 1,446.6674 1,445.7419 1,443.5220
Difference 0.1837 5.9199 4.9945 3.6994

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Mary Hardin-Baylor 90 1,984 1,228 179 101 61.90 11.1 19.6 1,585 758 91 152 52.18 17.4 10.4
Texas-Dallas 99 1,878 1,048 209 221 55.80 9.0 8.5 2,023 884 130 185 56.30 15.6 10.9
Sul Ross St. 79 1,483 812 148 114 54.75 10.0 13.0 1,427 741 135 112 48.07 10.6 12.7
Hardin-Simmons 70 1,457 791 135 158 54.29 10.8 9.2 1,446 790 123 115 45.37 11.8 12.6
East Tex. Baptist 90 1,913 1,088 160 144 56.87 12.0 13.3 1,902 1,091 131 172 42.64 14.5 11.1
McMurry 77 1,649 896 162 136 54.34 10.2 12.1 1,684 938 126 132 44.30 13.4 12.8
Concordia (TX) 92 1,873 957 155 195 51.10 12.1 9.6 1,966 1,094 170 162 44.35 11.6 12.1
LeTourneau 105 2,509 1,237 152 118 49.30 16.5 21.3 2,052 1,122 209 195 45.32 9.8 10.5
Belhaven 85 1,509 794 117 196 52.62 12.9 7.7 1,915 1,208 243 153 36.92 7.9 12.5
Howard Payne 82 1,366 694 101 128 50.81 13.5 10.7 1,810 1,111 220 159 38.62 8.2 11.4
Conference Average 87 1,762 955 152 151 54.18 11.8 12.5 1,781 974 158 154 45.41 12.1 11.7
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the ASC

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

77.98

2021-09-17
Texas-Dallas
Mary Hardin-Baylor
1
3
20
25
18
25
28
26
27
29
GAME

73.81

2021-10-22
Mary Hardin-Baylor
Texas-Dallas
2
3
22
25
19
25
25
19
25
19
14
16
GAME

73.06

2021-10-22
Sul Ross St.
East Tex. Baptist
2
3
33
35
27
29
25
23
26
24
9
15
GAME

72.57

2021-11-06
Mary Hardin-Baylor
Texas-Dallas
1
3
20
25
25
15
21
25
22
25
GAME

71.53

2021-09-18
LeTourneau
Mary Hardin-Baylor
1
3
17
25
25
17
12
25
21
25
GAME

71.39

2021-10-23
McMurry
Hardin-Simmons
3
1
22
25
25
22
25
20
28
26
GAME

71.00

2021-10-19
Mary Hardin-Baylor
Hardin-Simmons
3
2
23
25
21
25
25
20
25
21
15
9
GAME

70.39

2021-09-14
LeTourneau
East Tex. Baptist
3
2
20
25
27
25
24
26
26
24
15
13
GAME

69.91

2021-10-20
Mary Hardin-Baylor
McMurry
3
1
25
23
23
25
25
17
25
17
GAME

69.69

2021-10-08
McMurry
Mary Hardin-Baylor
0
3
18
25
27
29
21
25

HuskerGeek ASC All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
A
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 18.3809
2 16.6356
3 16.3350
4 15.9173
5 15.8333
6 15.6246
7 15.0283
8 14.8548
9 14.7565
10 13.2463

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 11.8322
2 10.1176
3 9.4076
4 9.1569
5 7.8060
6 7.7731
7 7.4519
8 7.2011
9 6.9173
10 6.3526

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 14.9115
2 13.3427
3 11.0303
4 10.9120
5 9.7247
6 9.7157
7 9.1581
8 9.1339
9 8.9733
10 8.9421

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2211
2 0.2188
3 0.2103
4 0.2056
5 0.1998
6 0.1953
7 0.1856
8 0.1800
9 0.1759
10 0.1698

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1643
2 0.1314
3 0.1120
4 0.1103
5 0.1098
6 0.0997
7 0.0976
8 0.0921
9 0.0909
10 0.0824

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1881
2 0.1522
3 0.1499
4 0.1496
5 0.1451
6 0.1221
7 0.1175
8 0.1121
9 0.1118
10 0.1118


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek