Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

ASUN - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 1
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Lipscomb 1,417.3316 1,407.5666 1,412.4407 42.85 59.31 0.002
2nd FGCU 1,399.0517 1,386.7312 1,392.8778 40.75 58.28 -0.021
3rd Northern Ky. 1,390.1429 1,374.4829 1,382.2907 40.49 58.58 -0.020
4th North Florida 1,380.2381 1,376.6587 1,378.4472 41.86 56.08 -0.021
5th ETSU 1,372.1906 1,352.4252 1,362.2720 41.43 55.97 -0.014
6th Kennesaw St. 1,316.0553 1,288.5594 1,302.2348 39.52 53.66 -0.077
7th USC Upstate 1,307.4282 1,290.6751 1,299.0247 37.49 53.54 -0.109
8th Mercer 1,306.3521 1,289.7993 1,298.0493 37.77 53.94 -0.090
9th Jacksonville 1,291.7749 1,280.9036 1,286.3278 37.37 53.33 -0.106
10th Stetson 1,198.6242 1,182.4104 1,190.4897 34.05 48.16 -0.174

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Lipscomb 0.2224 38.47 16.23 35.71 44.36 6.47 5.22
2nd Northern Ky. 0.2101 36.19 15.18 33.62 49.50 6.19 5.15
3rd ETSU 0.2020 37.14 16.94 34.52 46.30 6.67 5.58
4th FGCU 0.1985 37.06 17.21 34.53 47.60 5.31 4.38
5th Kennesaw St. 0.1789 35.28 17.38 33.77 48.17 6.48 5.06
6th North Florida 0.1768 34.21 16.53 32.26 50.77 6.31 5.31
7th Jacksonville 0.1636 34.78 18.42 32.37 49.57 7.09 5.37
8th USC Upstate 0.1417 30.18 16.00 28.32 55.41 5.86 5.34
9th Mercer 0.1412 28.86 14.75 27.00 58.34 5.59 4.83
10th Stetson 0.0814 27.05 18.91 25.20 58.37 7.20 4.59

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st North Florida 0.1975 33.18 13.43 30.69 53.34 4.87 4.80
2nd ETSU 0.2159 37.80 16.21 35.18 45.30 7.54 4.88
3rd FGCU 0.2192 37.23 15.31 34.82 47.81 5.93 6.32
4th Lipscomb 0.2204 35.16 13.12 32.27 51.67 4.17 3.92
5th Northern Ky. 0.2305 37.18 14.13 34.57 49.19 4.39 4.94
6th Mercer 0.2313 36.02 12.89 33.16 51.56 4.03 5.10
7th USC Upstate 0.2509 37.53 12.43 35.35 50.47 3.27 5.42
8th Stetson 0.2554 39.82 14.28 36.30 45.66 4.56 7.07
9th Kennesaw St. 0.2561 39.13 13.53 35.32 47.89 4.49 5.67
10th Jacksonville 0.2694 40.50 13.56 37.79 45.66 5.35 7.05

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,330.4455 1,337.6906 1,337.0531 1,335.4947 1,335.1710
Difference 7.2451 6.6077 5.0492 6.3006

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Northern Ky. 119 2,777 1,266 163 233 45.59 17.0 11.9 2,500 957 115 219 61.72 21.7 11.4
North Florida 130 2,896 1,315 168 265 45.41 17.2 10.9 2,754 1,151 126 201 58.21 21.9 13.7
FGCU 116 2,612 1,145 118 160 43.84 22.1 16.3 2,487 1,006 156 277 59.55 15.9 9.0
Lipscomb 104 2,311 1,016 122 204 43.96 18.9 11.3 2,221 910 89 158 59.03 25.0 14.1
ETSU 139 3,048 1,344 175 264 44.09 17.4 11.5 2,970 1,260 141 212 57.58 21.1 14.0
USC Upstate 109 2,393 1,056 157 159 44.13 15.2 15.1 2,332 1,004 120 186 56.95 19.4 12.5
Kennesaw St. 116 2,526 1,114 144 205 44.10 17.5 12.3 2,497 1,093 136 217 56.23 18.4 11.5
Mercer 107 2,297 946 119 214 41.18 19.3 10.7 2,386 1,048 115 215 56.08 20.7 11.1
Jacksonville 127 2,557 1,013 138 243 39.62 18.5 10.5 2,825 1,304 198 237 53.84 14.3 11.9
Stetson 125 2,441 950 129 269 38.92 18.9 9.1 2,879 1,413 204 273 50.92 14.1 10.5
Conference Average 119 2,586 1,117 143 222 43.08 18.2 12.0 2,585 1,115 140 220 57.01 19.2 12.0
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the ASUN

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

68.90

2012-10-05 Jacksonville, Fla.
North Florida
Mercer
2
3
22
25
26
24
25
19
19
25
12
15
GAME

68.68

2012-10-05 Johnson City, Tenn.
ETSU
Northern Ky.
3
2
26
28
25
21
26
24
21
25
15
13
GAME

68.36

2012-11-10 Fort Myers, Fla.
FGCU
Northern Ky.
2
3
25
23
25
22
20
25
23
25
11
15
GAME

66.68

2012-10-12 Spartanburg, S.C.
USC Upstate
North Florida
2
3
23
25
25
23
26
24
21
25
14
16
GAME

66.44

2012-10-23 Jacksonville, Fla.
North Florida
FGCU
1
3
27
29
16
25
25
19
18
25
GAME

66.43

2012-10-19 Spartanburg, S.C.
USC Upstate
ETSU
3
2
16
25
25
17
26
24
25
27
15
10
GAME

66.42

2012-09-18 Highland Heights, Ky
Northern Ky.
Lipscomb
2
3
25
16
15
25
25
23
24
26
13
15
GAME

66.29

2012-09-22 Nashville, TN
Lipscomb
North Florida
3
2
23
25
22
25
25
10
25
18
15
10
GAME

66.20

2012-10-27 Highland Heights, Ky
Northern Ky.
ETSU
2
3
20
25
25
19
25
27
25
22
10
15
GAME

66.17

2012-10-19 Fort Myers, Fla.
FGCU
Mercer
3
2
24
26
28
26
25
20
18
25
15
8

HuskerGeek ASUN All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 34.8409
2 27.3837
3 26.3213
4 22.7236
5 22.4538
6 21.8721
7 21.7313
8 21.6198
9 21.4370
10 21.4213

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 18.7802
2 18.1546
3 16.7376
4 15.6287
5 14.9740
6 13.9154
7 13.2528
8 13.1326
9 12.7403
10 12.5294

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 20.1050
2 18.1740
3 16.7915
4 16.6863
5 15.7108
6 15.5102
7 14.9381
8 14.2306
9 13.5264
10 13.1165

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2507
2 0.2301
3 0.2073
4 0.2060
5 0.2021
6 0.1936
7 0.1914
8 0.1910
9 0.1873
10 0.1793

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1578
2 0.1443
3 0.1338
4 0.1306
5 0.1281
6 0.1274
7 0.1179
8 0.1078
9 0.1068
10 0.1029

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1699
2 0.1559
3 0.1428
4 0.1411
5 0.1370
6 0.1244
7 0.1241
8 0.1200
9 0.1179
10 0.1136


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek