Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

ASUN - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 1
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st FGCU 1,704.4751 1,669.5901 1,686.9424 54.47 60.61 0.139
2nd Kennesaw St. 1,623.5914 1,588.3837 1,605.8911 47.42 55.79 0.061
3rd Lipscomb 1,595.1635 1,557.4646 1,576.2014 50.02 51.28 -0.002
4th Liberty 1,567.7925 1,533.7323 1,550.6689 46.31 54.92 0.039
5th Stetson 1,539.2668 1,505.0835 1,522.0792 47.02 51.95 -0.027
6th North Florida 1,507.7007 1,473.6674 1,490.5869 44.47 48.95 -0.052
7th Jacksonville 1,462.9519 1,432.2201 1,447.5044 41.31 49.75 -0.090
8th North Ala. 1,378.3466 1,343.9749 1,361.0523 40.69 43.49 -0.185
9th NJIT 1,347.7233 1,317.9615 1,332.7594 35.33 44.77 -0.230

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st FGCU 0.2652 39.27 12.76 36.83 47.26 5.31 6.39
2nd Kennesaw St. 0.2559 41.14 15.55 38.66 41.88 6.36 8.51
3rd Liberty 0.2282 37.89 15.06 35.08 47.73 6.54 5.40
4th Stetson 0.2197 33.94 11.97 31.02 54.11 5.53 5.70
5th North Florida 0.2054 35.41 14.87 33.35 49.68 6.54 6.16
6th Lipscomb 0.2029 36.71 16.42 33.51 46.91 6.55 5.47
7th Jacksonville 0.1832 34.18 15.86 31.92 52.48 5.78 5.14
8th North Ala. 0.1162 28.56 16.94 26.25 56.85 6.24 5.95
9th NJIT 0.0963 28.33 18.70 26.24 54.88 7.59 4.00

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st FGCU 0.1262 31.02 18.40 28.41 54.23 7.30 5.16
2nd Liberty 0.1896 34.54 15.58 31.85 49.42 7.45 6.13
3rd Kennesaw St. 0.1949 32.57 13.08 29.87 54.06 5.45 5.94
4th Lipscomb 0.2044 35.27 14.83 32.54 50.98 5.03 5.76
5th Stetson 0.2466 37.49 12.83 34.37 49.19 4.68 7.91
6th North Florida 0.2574 38.86 13.11 35.95 47.13 4.57 6.74
7th Jacksonville 0.2734 40.22 12.88 36.88 46.50 5.24 7.31
8th North Ala. 0.3011 43.02 12.92 39.69 42.30 4.91 10.85
9th NJIT 0.3264 45.33 12.68 41.59 39.72 3.69 9.18

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,508.1873 1,507.7120 1,517.4082 1,521.1117 1,513.6048
Difference -0.4753 9.2208 12.9243 7.2233

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
FGCU 99 2,384 1,337 154 181 56.08 15.5 13.2 1,844 750 84 175 59.33 22.0 10.5
Kennesaw St. 110 2,453 1,203 223 301 49.04 11.0 8.1 2,244 1,026 122 215 54.28 18.4 10.4
Liberty 121 2,613 1,261 147 321 48.26 17.8 8.1 2,553 1,190 158 219 53.39 16.2 11.7
Stetson 103 2,208 1,111 130 124 50.32 17.0 17.8 2,225 1,094 158 183 50.83 14.1 12.2
Lipscomb 101 2,223 1,144 131 179 51.46 17.0 12.4 2,144 1,084 118 177 49.44 18.2 12.1
North Florida 126 2,720 1,353 186 293 49.74 14.6 9.3 2,731 1,371 169 246 49.80 16.2 11.1
Jacksonville 116 2,350 1,052 143 263 44.77 16.4 8.9 2,512 1,266 173 234 49.60 14.5 10.7
North Ala. 101 1,858 812 117 144 43.70 15.9 12.9 2,382 1,344 242 226 43.58 9.8 10.5
NJIT 110 2,012 808 98 231 40.16 20.5 8.7 2,621 1,420 224 274 45.82 11.7 9.6
Conference Average 110 2,313 1,120 148 226 48.17 16.2 11.1 2,362 1,172 161 217 50.67 15.7 11.0
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the ASUN

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

77.60

2019-11-08
Kennesaw St.
FGCU
3
1
28
30
30
28
25
21
25
21
GAME

75.79

2019-10-25
North Florida
Stetson
2
3
27
25
27
25
24
26
21
25
13
15
GAME

75.28

2019-10-27
Lipscomb
Stetson
2
3
25
20
25
27
22
25
25
23
13
15
GAME

75.18

2019-10-11
Stetson
North Florida
3
1
25
23
32
34
25
21
25
23
GAME

74.99

2019-11-21 Fort Myers, FL
Lipscomb
Stetson
3
1
18
25
25
19
30
28
25
20
GAME

74.71

2019-09-27
Stetson
Lipscomb
2
3
25
18
23
25
25
19
22
25
11
15
GAME

73.92

2019-11-15
North Florida
Lipscomb
1
3
18
25
24
26
26
24
14
25
GAME

73.53

2019-11-17
Liberty
Kennesaw St.
1
3
36
38
25
20
18
25
24
26
GAME

73.25

2019-10-13
Liberty
Stetson
2
3
25
23
23
25
26
24
17
25
10
15
GAME

73.09

2019-09-24
Liberty
FGCU
3
0
25
22
25
23
25
22

HuskerGeek ASUN All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 22.3235
2 21.7989
3 21.0727
4 19.9834
5 19.9783
6 19.6159
7 19.3920
8 19.1633
9 19.0894
10 18.7350

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 16.7696
2 13.9022
3 13.2764
4 12.4282
5 12.2441
6 12.1126
7 12.0221
8 12.0213
9 12.0140
10 11.7964

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 21.2414
2 16.3223
3 16.0794
4 16.0524
5 15.2260
6 14.9278
7 14.1033
8 11.4286
9 10.9353
10 10.6419

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2167
2 0.2039
3 0.2037
4 0.1972
5 0.1959
6 0.1850
7 0.1833
8 0.1823
9 0.1801
10 0.1742

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1567
2 0.1314
3 0.1265
4 0.1237
5 0.1204
6 0.1188
7 0.1113
8 0.1103
9 0.1092
10 0.1060

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1686
2 0.1586
3 0.1517
4 0.1449
5 0.1446
6 0.1407
7 0.1396
8 0.1182
9 0.1110
10 0.1022


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek