Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

America East - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 1
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Albany (NY) 1,550.9871 1,566.9765 1,558.9613 42.35 54.23 -0.048
2nd Stony Brook 1,560.5351 1,557.3339 1,558.9337 40.47 56.71 -0.026
3rd New Hampshire 1,537.6769 1,531.5619 1,534.6164 40.37 54.80 -0.053
4th Binghamton 1,520.5884 1,527.4411 1,524.0109 40.00 53.44 -0.067
5th UMBC 1,518.1638 1,504.3582 1,511.2452 38.90 55.59 -0.046
6th Hartford 1,442.6362 1,427.6995 1,435.1484 35.52 49.55 -0.146
7th UMass Lowell 1,435.3748 1,413.4044 1,424.3473 35.09 50.21 -0.157

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Stony Brook 0.2026 33.87 13.61 32.26 52.43 5.44 5.01
2nd Binghamton 0.1813 34.58 16.45 31.87 48.12 8.48 5.44
3rd New Hampshire 0.1770 33.48 15.78 31.67 52.14 6.77 7.39
4th Albany (NY) 0.1672 32.38 15.66 29.78 53.16 5.46 4.34
5th UMBC 0.1667 32.47 15.79 30.77 53.92 5.74 4.79
6th Hartford 0.1239 31.14 18.75 28.57 52.80 7.21 6.72
7th UMass Lowell 0.1032 30.77 20.45 29.33 52.63 8.10 5.71

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st UMBC 0.2131 37.16 15.85 34.89 48.27 5.87 6.46
2nd Albany (NY) 0.2152 35.68 14.16 32.95 51.25 4.65 7.04
3rd Stony Brook 0.2289 36.26 13.37 34.13 51.41 4.47 5.96
4th New Hampshire 0.2301 37.48 14.47 35.12 50.31 3.78 6.92
5th Binghamton 0.2485 38.28 13.43 35.17 48.45 4.02 6.15
6th UMass Lowell 0.2602 39.95 13.92 37.24 46.23 4.48 6.81
7th Hartford 0.2697 42.24 15.27 38.46 41.62 5.76 6.97

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,506.7519 1,512.7909 1,523.2908 1,524.0109 1,516.7111
Difference 6.0390 16.5389 17.2590 13.2790

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Stony Brook 118 2,589 1,136 148 199 43.88 17.5 13.0 2,536 1,075 157 231 57.61 16.2 11.0
UMBC 91 2,012 858 110 205 42.64 18.3 9.8 2,027 875 133 201 56.83 15.2 10.1
New Hampshire 102 2,192 951 170 235 43.39 12.9 9.3 2,245 997 151 191 55.59 14.9 11.8
Binghamton 102 2,195 960 137 198 43.74 16.0 11.1 2,232 1,001 139 184 55.15 16.1 12.1
Albany (NY) 89 1,876 804 84 128 42.86 22.3 14.7 1,987 926 145 191 53.40 13.7 10.4
UMass Lowell 90 1,856 746 121 163 40.19 15.3 11.4 2,066 978 141 193 52.66 14.7 10.7
Hartford 92 1,874 752 137 244 40.13 13.7 7.7 2,138 1,021 145 190 52.25 14.7 11.3
Conference Average 98 2,085 887 130 196 42.40 16.6 11.0 2,176 982 144 197 54.78 15.1 11.0
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the America East

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

75.17

2017-11-10
Stony Brook
Albany (NY)
1
3
23
25
21
25
25
23
16
25
GAME

74.51

2017-10-06 Durham, NH
New Hampshire
Stony Brook
3
2
25
18
23
25
24
26
25
23
15
11
GAME

74.50

2017-10-15 Albany, N.Y.
Albany (NY)
Stony Brook
3
1
23
25
25
21
25
23
25
23
GAME

72.53

2017-11-12 Stony Brook, N.Y.
Stony Brook
Binghamton
1
3
25
17
13
25
23
25
21
25
GAME

72.27

2017-11-05 Stony Brook, N.Y.
Stony Brook
New Hampshire
2
3
14
25
27
25
25
21
20
25
10
15
GAME

71.73

2017-10-13 Vestal, N.Y.
Binghamton
Stony Brook
3
2
25
22
16
25
25
15
20
25
15
12
GAME

71.61

2017-10-06 Baltimore, Md.
UMBC
Binghamton
3
1
21
25
25
18
25
23
25
23
GAME

70.86

2017-10-13 Durham, NH
New Hampshire
UMBC
2
3
21
25
25
19
25
27
25
23
12
15
GAME

70.79

2017-11-12 Baltimore, Md.
UMBC
New Hampshire
0
3
28
30
20
25
22
25
GAME

70.29

2017-09-29 Albany, N.Y.
Albany (NY)
New Hampshire
2
3
25
14
25
21
19
25
18
25
9
15

HuskerGeek America East All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 23.2563
2 22.7582
3 21.6230
4 19.1151
5 17.6334
6 17.4321
7 15.1016
8 14.9832
9 14.5087
10 14.0663

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 14.9725
2 12.9078
3 10.0719
4 9.5464
5 9.3151
6 9.1312
7 9.0240
8 8.7907
9 8.4763
10 8.3271

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 17.1829
2 13.2347
3 13.1458
4 12.9567
5 12.5489
6 12.3352
7 11.5511
8 9.8503
9 9.5687
10 8.9558

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2231
2 0.1971
3 0.1934
4 0.1897
5 0.1874
6 0.1874
7 0.1832
8 0.1712
9 0.1610
10 0.1530

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1269
2 0.1265
3 0.1203
4 0.1113
5 0.0936
6 0.0911
7 0.0895
8 0.0854
9 0.0797
10 0.0789

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1741
2 0.1456
3 0.1440
4 0.1410
5 0.1302
6 0.1209
7 0.0979
8 0.0966
9 0.0963
10 0.0938


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek