Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

America East - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 1
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st UMBC 1,405.1184 1,402.9047 1,404.0111 50.71 47.87 -0.026
2nd Albany (NY) 1,371.8877 1,373.4726 1,372.6799 47.25 48.40 -0.046
3rd Stony Brook 1,360.5284 1,366.8009 1,363.6610 45.95 48.74 -0.043
4th New Hampshire 1,313.9877 1,316.2699 1,315.1283 47.95 45.55 -0.097
5th Hartford 1,249.1490 1,244.6416 1,246.8933 42.24 42.43 -0.173
6th Binghamton 1,210.4796 1,211.9630 1,211.2211 43.28 39.94 -0.187
7th NJIT 1,167.9157 1,176.0962 1,171.9988 37.08 42.72 -0.238

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Stony Brook 0.1872 32.95 14.23 30.55 50.98 5.15 5.56
2nd Albany (NY) 0.1740 34.55 17.15 32.38 48.70 6.91 5.61
3rd UMBC 0.1704 32.93 15.88 30.31 50.21 6.61 4.59
4th New Hampshire 0.1593 31.79 15.86 28.46 53.82 6.51 5.48
5th Hartford 0.0949 26.57 17.08 24.60 58.31 7.17 5.19
6th NJIT 0.0880 28.85 20.04 27.33 55.12 7.74 4.30
7th Binghamton 0.0716 25.66 18.50 23.34 59.46 6.05 5.52

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st UMBC 0.1968 34.60 14.92 31.53 50.42 5.46 6.29
2nd Albany (NY) 0.2204 37.63 15.59 33.53 45.93 6.57 7.18
3rd Stony Brook 0.2298 36.89 13.91 34.07 49.67 3.96 6.53
4th New Hampshire 0.2561 40.82 15.21 36.74 43.43 4.96 8.32
5th Binghamton 0.2583 40.37 14.54 36.45 43.81 4.84 10.03
6th Hartford 0.2681 39.83 13.02 36.89 46.54 5.01 7.80
7th NJIT 0.3264 46.32 13.68 41.93 37.94 5.78 9.27

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,297.9419 1,301.9167 1,308.5609 1,315.1283 1,305.8870
Difference 3.9748 10.6189 17.1864 10.5934

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
New Hampshire 103 2,000 1,084 168 177 54.20 11.9 11.3 1,971 1,002 183 213 49.16 10.8 9.3
UMBC 113 2,433 1,322 141 142 54.34 17.3 17.1 2,289 1,172 146 219 48.80 15.7 10.5
Albany (NY) 111 2,293 1,162 155 226 50.68 14.8 10.1 2,251 1,131 151 189 49.76 14.9 11.9
Stony Brook 96 2,034 1,022 143 196 50.25 14.2 10.4 1,998 1,000 122 164 49.95 16.4 12.2
Hartford 84 1,592 752 105 162 47.24 15.2 9.8 1,850 1,020 132 185 44.87 14.0 10.0
Binghamton 86 1,364 663 118 220 48.61 11.6 6.2 1,624 920 178 185 43.35 9.1 8.8
NJIT 89 1,432 604 92 178 42.18 15.6 8.0 1,842 1,011 183 201 45.11 10.1 9.2
Conference Average 97 1,878 944 132 186 49.64 14.4 10.4 1,975 1,037 156 194 47.29 13.0 10.2
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the America East

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

66.07

2021-09-25
UMBC
Stony Brook
3
1
25
27
25
16
25
21
25
18
GAME

65.95

2021-10-15
New Hampshire
Albany (NY)
3
2
25
22
23
25
25
15
23
25
15
9
GAME

65.87

2021-10-22
Albany (NY)
UMBC
1
3
25
27
23
25
29
27
20
25
GAME

65.21

2021-11-19
UMBC
Stony Brook
3
2
22
25
27
25
25
27
25
19
17
15
GAME

64.43

2021-11-12
Stony Brook
UMBC
0
3
21
25
18
25
22
25
GAME

63.54

2021-10-01
New Hampshire
UMBC
1
3
18
25
25
19
19
25
22
25
GAME

63.27

2021-11-07
UMBC
Albany (NY)
3
1
25
19
25
17
23
25
25
22
GAME

62.90

2021-10-31
Albany (NY)
New Hampshire
3
2
25
15
23
25
23
25
25
23
15
13
GAME

62.11

2021-11-05
Stony Brook
Albany (NY)
0
3
16
25
22
25
18
25
GAME

61.82

2021-10-08
Stony Brook
New Hampshire
3
2
25
21
25
16
17
25
19
25
15
11

HuskerGeek America East All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 17.9295
2 16.9488
3 16.4301
4 16.2051
5 15.7816
6 15.6694
7 15.2420
8 15.2350
9 13.9938
10 13.4254

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 10.0259
2 9.8310
3 9.7691
4 9.3677
5 9.2497
6 8.8016
7 7.0989
8 7.0649
9 6.7027
10 6.5359

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 16.0895
2 14.2496
3 12.5244
4 11.1055
5 10.8267
6 9.1402
7 8.5618
8 7.6282
9 7.2912
10 7.1446

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.1904
2 0.1793
3 0.1691
4 0.1638
5 0.1621
6 0.1521
7 0.1521
8 0.1508
9 0.1494
10 0.1466

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1127
2 0.1117
3 0.1050
4 0.0889
5 0.0884
6 0.0855
7 0.0773
8 0.0772
9 0.0757
10 0.0748

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1463
2 0.1407
3 0.1406
4 0.1370
5 0.1164
6 0.1074
7 0.0914
8 0.0842
9 0.0808
10 0.0794


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek