Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

American Rivers - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Wartburg 1,530.0602 1,494.7862 1,512.3203 57.97 61.41 0.214
2nd Dubuque 1,493.9483 1,458.1532 1,475.9422 58.03 58.64 0.176
3rd Loras 1,464.3471 1,433.8815 1,449.0342 53.97 62.11 0.177
4th Coe 1,449.9615 1,417.1313 1,433.4524 55.94 57.59 0.120
5th Neb. Wesleyan 1,451.4612 1,414.8655 1,433.0465 55.89 57.53 0.142
6th Central (IA) 1,390.6749 1,359.5993 1,375.0493 50.80 56.47 0.122
7th Buena Vista 1,379.4058 1,342.9103 1,361.0357 50.98 56.25 0.079
8th Luther 1,363.4227 1,330.8874 1,347.0569 52.46 53.42 0.061
9th Simpson 1,334.6269 1,307.9774 1,321.2350 52.04 50.97 0.050

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Wartburg 0.2682 37.60 10.77 33.93 48.72 2.62 10.82
2nd Dubuque 0.2519 36.41 11.23 33.64 51.59 1.78 8.80
3rd Neb. Wesleyan 0.2510 36.38 11.28 33.45 51.31 3.17 9.73
4th Loras 0.2467 38.73 14.06 35.10 47.68 2.66 9.01
5th Coe 0.2235 36.39 14.04 34.14 51.01 3.51 12.18
6th Central (IA) 0.2190 36.66 14.77 30.79 51.57 3.04 10.09
7th Luther 0.2103 34.49 13.46 31.82 51.52 3.35 8.86
8th Buena Vista 0.2012 34.26 14.15 31.64 53.50 3.06 9.23
9th Simpson 0.1768 34.73 17.05 31.25 49.39 4.01 9.45

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Wartburg 0.0541 22.85 17.45 20.90 58.78 6.55 6.20
2nd Loras 0.0697 25.60 18.62 24.07 57.06 5.32 6.37
3rd Dubuque 0.0763 24.07 16.44 23.25 61.50 5.15 5.68
4th Central (IA) 0.0972 26.02 16.30 24.21 57.90 4.21 9.81
5th Coe 0.1038 26.42 16.04 23.59 61.79 4.33 4.85
6th Neb. Wesleyan 0.1095 27.39 16.44 25.19 60.39 4.93 6.70
7th Buena Vista 0.1224 28.24 16.00 27.00 59.74 3.24 7.92
8th Simpson 0.1263 28.85 16.22 26.73 55.81 4.64 9.22
9th Luther 0.1495 31.23 16.29 28.97 53.92 3.88 10.01

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,412.0192 1,410.6596 1,410.3236 1,413.8494 1,411.7130
Difference -1.3596 -1.6955 1.8302 -0.4083

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Loras 104 2,286 1,246 154 171 54.51 14.8 13.4 1,967 874 147 172 55.57 13.4 11.4
Neb. Wesleyan 106 2,302 1,304 182 147 56.65 12.6 15.7 1,981 931 153 162 53.00 12.9 12.2
Wartburg 118 2,360 1,286 209 154 54.49 11.3 15.3 1,957 888 160 179 54.62 12.2 10.9
Dubuque 121 2,661 1,439 166 167 54.08 16.0 15.9 2,389 1,149 157 219 51.91 15.2 10.9
Coe 132 1,989 1,090 270 311 54.80 7.4 6.4 1,778 877 153 232 50.68 11.6 7.7
Central (IA) 104 2,034 1,066 211 270 52.41 9.6 7.5 1,908 922 215 177 51.68 8.9 10.8
Buena Vista 108 2,344 1,211 172 188 51.66 13.6 12.5 2,272 1,101 185 189 51.54 12.3 12.0
Luther 105 2,183 1,101 143 151 50.44 15.3 14.5 2,336 1,243 248 215 46.79 9.4 10.9
Simpson 105 1,935 931 168 199 48.11 11.5 9.7 2,091 1,132 217 215 45.86 9.6 9.7
Conference Average 111 2,233 1,186 186 195 53.02 12.5 12.3 2,075 1,013 182 196 51.29 11.7 10.7
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the American Rivers

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

70.91

2019-10-11 Lincoln, Neb.
Neb. Wesleyan
Dubuque
1
3
25
16
21
25
25
27
22
25
GAME

70.71

2019-10-19 Dubuque, Iowa
Loras
Wartburg
2
3
19
25
25
17
25
19
22
25
13
15
GAME

68.50

2019-11-05
Dubuque
Buena Vista
3
2
21
25
25
16
23
25
25
17
15
11
GAME

68.05

2019-10-12 Lincoln, Neb.
Neb. Wesleyan
Loras
2
3
25
22
23
25
25
14
20
25
8
15
GAME

67.54

2019-09-24
Wartburg
Dubuque
3
2
25
27
25
17
25
20
24
26
15
13
GAME

67.22

2019-10-26
Coe
Buena Vista
3
1
25
22
25
16
23
25
27
25
GAME

67.18

2019-10-11 Pella, Iowa
Central (IA)
Wartburg
1
3
16
25
25
19
21
25
20
25
GAME

66.21

2019-10-25
Luther
Buena Vista
3
1
25
23
25
20
20
25
28
26
GAME

66.13

2019-10-11 Storm Lake, Iowa
Buena Vista
Loras
2
3
10
25
25
20
21
25
25
17
10
15
GAME

65.63

2019-10-01
Simpson
Buena Vista
2
3
25
18
21
25
25
20
26
28
11
15

HuskerGeek American Rivers All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 23.4156
2 23.1202
3 21.3770
4 21.2939
5 21.2605
6 21.2018
7 21.0443
8 19.1466
9 18.4446
10 18.0841

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 12.5409
2 11.9911
3 11.9222
4 11.0654
5 10.8964
6 10.8182
7 9.6883
8 9.3184
9 9.0385
10 8.7020

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 21.6317
2 19.2581
3 19.0639
4 16.8381
5 14.6480
6 14.0818
7 14.0796
8 12.4288
9 12.3857
10 10.9631

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2192
2 0.2117
3 0.2081
4 0.2067
5 0.2010
6 0.2004
7 0.2001
8 0.1942
9 0.1862
10 0.1860

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1293
2 0.1255
3 0.1142
4 0.1096
5 0.1090
6 0.1082
7 0.1053
8 0.0978
9 0.0971
10 0.0954

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1888
2 0.1870
3 0.1849
4 0.1684
5 0.1542
6 0.1424
7 0.1396
8 0.1341
9 0.1225
10 0.1179


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek