Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

American Rivers - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Wartburg 1,630.3306 1,628.2946 1,629.3123 65.80 57.95 0.286
2nd Coe 1,518.3694 1,510.4994 1,514.4293 61.57 53.36 0.155
3rd Loras 1,486.8914 1,484.7135 1,485.8021 59.38 51.91 0.145
4th Dubuque 1,459.9285 1,457.3657 1,458.6466 57.91 50.15 0.116
5th Neb. Wesleyan 1,392.8312 1,393.6325 1,393.2318 58.31 45.60 0.048
6th Central (IA) 1,386.3551 1,388.7772 1,387.5656 54.99 48.11 0.093
7th Buena Vista 1,375.0283 1,374.7051 1,374.8667 54.68 48.34 0.045
8th Simpson 1,374.0098 1,373.2271 1,373.6184 53.56 46.06 0.057
9th Luther 1,271.1664 1,269.3328 1,270.2493 51.28 41.81 -0.055

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Wartburg 0.2957 39.04 9.47 35.62 50.49 2.48 9.42
2nd Coe 0.2525 37.85 12.59 35.51 49.59 3.93 11.72
3rd Loras 0.2464 36.59 11.96 33.59 51.14 3.96 9.77
4th Dubuque 0.2406 36.34 12.28 32.75 49.33 2.60 9.67
5th Central (IA) 0.2183 36.88 15.05 33.66 50.62 3.69 8.65
6th Buena Vista 0.2005 33.71 13.67 30.34 52.32 3.14 8.56
7th Simpson 0.1862 35.17 16.54 30.92 48.79 3.79 9.43
8th Neb. Wesleyan 0.1775 31.85 14.10 29.10 55.72 3.05 10.58
9th Luther 0.1418 30.43 16.25 27.54 54.13 3.32 8.96

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Wartburg 0.0096 19.14 18.18 17.67 67.15 6.46 4.77
2nd Coe 0.0972 25.74 16.02 23.99 61.16 3.97 6.16
3rd Loras 0.1012 25.24 15.12 23.02 61.79 4.43 5.06
4th Dubuque 0.1242 27.67 15.25 25.25 56.24 4.17 6.91
5th Central (IA) 0.1255 29.39 16.84 25.90 56.45 5.05 8.39
6th Simpson 0.1293 28.72 15.80 25.48 55.88 3.68 7.58
7th Neb. Wesleyan 0.1295 28.94 16.00 26.38 54.47 3.60 10.00
8th Buena Vista 0.1555 30.34 14.79 27.57 51.76 3.73 7.43
9th Luther 0.1972 33.23 13.51 28.63 49.86 3.97 8.44

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,431.9691 1,426.8801 1,420.0225 1,413.1480 1,423.0049
Difference -5.0891 -11.9466 -18.8211 -11.9522

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Wartburg 108 2,245 1,327 172 140 59.11 13.1 16.0 1,799 855 127 160 52.47 14.2 11.2
Coe 116 2,195 1,276 245 210 58.13 9.0 10.5 1,926 969 164 196 49.69 11.7 9.8
Loras 122 2,551 1,432 214 178 56.14 11.9 14.3 2,352 1,227 157 199 47.83 15.0 11.8
Buena Vista 75 1,269 699 125 124 55.08 10.2 10.2 1,270 694 131 121 45.35 9.7 10.5
Neb. Wesleyan 91 1,614 923 168 155 57.19 9.6 10.4 1,619 925 183 176 42.87 8.8 9.2
Dubuque 118 2,014 1,068 174 153 53.03 11.6 13.2 2,048 1,123 209 224 45.17 9.8 9.1
Central (IA) 96 1,620 848 157 233 52.35 10.3 7.0 1,715 953 188 194 44.43 9.1 8.8
Simpson 82 1,406 710 122 180 50.50 11.5 7.8 1,575 913 176 172 42.03 8.9 9.2
Luther 88 1,328 627 123 113 47.21 10.8 11.8 1,730 1,057 205 196 38.90 8.4 8.8
Conference Average 100 1,805 990 167 165 54.30 10.9 11.2 1,782 968 171 182 45.42 10.6 9.8
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the American Rivers

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

77.82

2021-11-06
Wartburg
Coe
3
2
23
25
29
31
25
18
25
23
15
8
GAME

76.31

2021-09-21
Coe
Loras
3
2
25
13
19
25
26
24
26
28
15
12
GAME

72.61

2021-10-13
Wartburg
Loras
3
1
25
18
25
19
23
25
25
23
GAME

72.56

2021-09-29
Dubuque
Coe
2
3
29
27
20
25
28
26
19
25
9
15
GAME

72.38

2021-10-16
Coe
Wartburg
2
3
18
25
19
25
25
17
25
20
15
17
GAME

72.22

2021-09-21
Dubuque
Wartburg
1
3
28
30
22
25
25
22
20
25
GAME

70.10

2021-10-09
Simpson
Loras
3
2
25
22
9
25
17
25
26
24
15
13
GAME

68.47

2021-11-05
Wartburg
Dubuque
3
0
25
8
25
18
25
23
GAME

68.02

2021-10-09
Central (IA)
Dubuque
3
2
22
25
26
24
22
25
25
18
15
11
GAME

67.42

2021-10-27
Buena Vista
Simpson
3
2
33
35
12
25
25
23
26
24
15
9

HuskerGeek American Rivers All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 23.9779
2 23.8514
3 23.0696
4 21.4636
5 20.2279
6 18.3643
7 18.2198
8 17.9389
9 17.0977
10 17.0642

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 13.6666
2 12.5451
3 12.4994
4 11.8242
5 11.4912
6 11.3263
7 11.3073
8 10.4839
9 10.2266
10 9.2917

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 18.9764
2 16.9551
3 15.2883
4 11.6826
5 11.6094
6 11.4785
7 11.3424
8 11.3062
9 11.2454
10 10.1563

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.3113
2 0.2398
3 0.2354
4 0.2259
5 0.2074
6 0.2024
7 0.1888
8 0.1867
9 0.1822
10 0.1759

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1733
2 0.1408
3 0.1250
4 0.1224
5 0.1207
6 0.1192
7 0.1190
8 0.1188
9 0.1091
10 0.1048

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1785
2 0.1650
3 0.1529
4 0.1379
5 0.1345
6 0.1328
7 0.1304
8 0.1291
9 0.1193
10 0.1148


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek