Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

Atlantic 10 - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 1
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Dayton 1,491.9146 1,496.7046 1,494.3077 54.03 54.30 0.081
2nd VCU 1,434.5439 1,442.3259 1,438.4296 49.84 53.57 0.037
3rd Saint Louis 1,402.2878 1,411.1532 1,406.7135 48.43 52.87 -0.003
4th Davidson 1,373.3190 1,377.0707 1,375.1936 48.89 50.10 -0.042
5th Rhode Island 1,338.6332 1,338.9066 1,338.7699 42.13 49.71 -0.085
6th Fordham 1,336.4959 1,339.6702 1,338.0821 46.93 47.40 -0.069
7th Duquesne 1,338.0639 1,336.2233 1,337.1433 47.56 46.86 -0.076
8th George Mason 1,281.5745 1,287.9155 1,284.7411 44.34 44.87 -0.144
9th George Washington 1,239.8260 1,241.7759 1,240.8006 46.89 39.95 -0.182

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Dayton 0.2363 38.83 15.21 34.88 47.32 5.51 8.04
2nd VCU 0.2326 37.79 14.53 34.70 49.03 5.54 5.25
3rd Saint Louis 0.2054 36.98 16.45 34.37 49.88 6.15 7.19
4th Davidson 0.1798 32.54 14.56 30.09 54.92 6.08 5.69
5th Fordham 0.1729 32.68 15.39 29.80 53.32 6.59 5.22
6th Duquesne 0.1663 33.58 16.94 31.49 50.22 7.80 5.72
7th Rhode Island 0.1617 31.54 15.38 29.42 53.56 5.99 5.40
8th George Mason 0.1527 32.17 16.90 29.11 53.08 7.01 6.00
9th George Washington 0.0968 27.56 17.88 24.50 59.21 6.58 6.13

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Dayton 0.1553 32.64 17.11 29.81 51.37 7.47 3.71
2nd VCU 0.1959 34.25 14.66 31.33 51.52 5.67 5.11
3rd Saint Louis 0.2080 35.22 14.42 32.74 51.07 5.84 6.69
4th Davidson 0.2214 36.40 14.26 32.94 50.00 5.51 6.74
5th Duquesne 0.2419 38.16 13.97 34.62 47.87 4.97 8.52
6th Fordham 0.2420 37.60 13.40 34.86 47.57 5.37 7.65
7th Rhode Island 0.2468 37.88 13.19 35.41 48.22 4.17 6.46
8th George Washington 0.2786 42.35 14.49 38.38 42.27 4.86 10.03
9th George Mason 0.2971 42.21 12.51 38.88 44.81 4.58 7.54

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,361.5757 1,359.8676 1,359.1805 1,350.6819 1,357.8264
Difference -1.7081 -2.3952 -10.8938 -4.9991

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Dayton 115 2,353 1,274 216 278 54.14 10.9 8.5 2,038 958 92 189 52.99 22.2 10.8
Saint Louis 115 2,008 1,009 201 242 50.25 10.0 8.3 1,900 893 153 159 53.00 12.4 11.9
VCU 109 2,378 1,195 131 189 50.25 18.2 12.6 2,266 1,081 126 194 52.30 18.0 11.7
Davidson 101 1,784 932 131 157 52.24 13.6 11.4 1,750 872 140 148 50.17 12.5 11.8
Duquesne 114 2,023 1,018 150 194 50.32 13.5 10.4 2,124 1,104 224 212 48.02 9.5 10.0
Rhode Island 116 1,544 719 162 197 46.57 9.5 7.8 1,638 796 146 237 51.40 11.2 6.9
Fordham 112 2,100 1,032 135 143 49.14 15.6 14.7 2,207 1,139 192 198 48.39 11.5 11.1
George Mason 99 1,594 743 138 176 46.61 11.6 9.1 1,827 1,009 166 215 44.77 11.0 8.5
George Washington 92 1,516 742 121 145 48.95 12.5 10.5 1,905 1,140 208 182 40.16 9.2 10.5
Conference Average 108 1,922 963 154 191 49.83 12.8 10.4 1,962 999 161 193 49.02 13.0 10.4
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the Atlantic 10

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

74.78

2021-10-08
Dayton
VCU
3
1
25
23
38
36
23
25
26
24
GAME

69.46

2021-10-22
VCU
Dayton
2
3
25
23
18
25
20
25
25
22
11
15
GAME

69.19

2021-11-20
Dayton
Duquesne
3
2
22
25
19
25
25
18
25
23
15
7
GAME

68.99

2021-10-29
Davidson
VCU
1
3
29
31
25
15
10
25
22
25
GAME

67.23

2021-11-12
Saint Louis
Dayton
1
3
23
25
18
25
26
24
14
25
GAME

67.07

2021-11-05
Fordham
Saint Louis
2
3
20
25
25
17
21
25
26
24
11
15
GAME

66.34

2021-10-10
Duquesne
Davidson
3
1
27
25
22
25
28
26
25
23
GAME

66.18

2021-09-26
VCU
Saint Louis
2
3
18
25
16
25
25
20
25
20
13
15
GAME

65.64

2021-10-16
Saint Louis
Davidson
1
3
25
22
17
25
25
27
11
25
GAME

65.57

2021-10-10
Dayton
Saint Louis
3
1
25
15
22
25
25
21
25
19

HuskerGeek Atlantic 10 All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 20.9360
2 19.9348
3 18.9910
4 16.8830
5 16.8138
6 16.1699
7 16.0438
8 15.8264
9 15.7896
10 15.7723

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 13.0968
2 12.1921
3 10.9280
4 10.3273
5 9.3277
6 9.3030
7 9.1813
8 8.6861
9 8.6199
10 8.5708

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 14.6415
2 14.0569
3 12.5323
4 12.3518
5 11.1191
6 11.0042
7 10.7054
8 10.1532
9 9.6880
10 8.2216

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2158
2 0.2121
3 0.2121
4 0.1999
5 0.1996
6 0.1828
7 0.1792
8 0.1741
9 0.1667
10 0.1653

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1350
2 0.1297
3 0.1297
4 0.1256
5 0.1120
6 0.1065
7 0.1052
8 0.1009
9 0.0979
10 0.0962

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1779
2 0.1479
3 0.1372
4 0.1357
5 0.1355
6 0.1319
7 0.1222
8 0.1090
9 0.1020
10 0.0953


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek