Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

Big 12 - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 1
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Texas 1,667.4739 1,669.7220 1,668.5976 52.76 73.74 0.277
2nd Iowa St. 1,653.8895 1,643.7198 1,648.7968 54.80 70.27 0.249
3rd Texas A&M 1,583.2992 1,570.5209 1,576.8971 49.80 68.33 0.178
4th Oklahoma 1,582.9044 1,559.2835 1,571.0496 48.73 69.41 0.179
5th Kansas St. 1,564.5786 1,557.1296 1,560.8497 48.18 67.40 0.144
6th Kansas 1,541.2332 1,516.1323 1,528.6312 50.20 64.27 0.154
7th Missouri 1,526.5555 1,505.2910 1,515.8860 46.84 65.08 0.123
8th Baylor 1,518.1031 1,499.1991 1,508.6215 48.70 63.21 0.128
9th Texas Tech 1,480.1038 1,451.0377 1,465.4987 45.58 62.44 0.098

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Texas 0.3668 48.00 11.32 45.11 40.18 3.58 6.03
2nd Iowa St. 0.3269 43.20 10.51 39.66 42.75 3.88 5.91
3rd Oklahoma 0.3025 41.05 10.80 37.83 46.46 3.64 5.19
4th Texas A&M 0.2967 42.72 13.06 39.44 44.82 4.27 6.78
5th Missouri 0.2921 41.66 12.45 39.09 45.20 5.43 6.62
6th Kansas St. 0.2824 41.10 12.86 38.14 46.33 4.89 6.13
7th Kansas 0.2760 41.70 14.11 38.38 44.55 4.60 5.62
8th Baylor 0.2646 38.52 12.05 35.29 49.59 4.41 4.77
9th Texas Tech 0.2351 38.74 15.24 36.32 47.87 5.72 5.15

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Iowa St. 0.0776 26.04 18.28 24.51 59.46 7.09 4.07
2nd Texas 0.0898 29.68 20.71 28.51 53.36 9.40 3.57
3rd Texas A&M 0.1184 28.73 16.89 26.83 56.53 6.37 3.80
4th Kansas 0.1220 31.16 18.96 29.62 52.29 8.14 4.78
5th Oklahoma 0.1233 30.23 17.90 28.24 52.25 7.01 4.02
6th Baylor 0.1371 29.65 15.94 27.06 57.17 5.93 4.33
7th Texas Tech 0.1376 32.45 18.70 30.14 51.11 8.30 5.37
8th Kansas St. 0.1389 30.98 17.09 29.58 54.04 7.69 4.12
9th Missouri 0.1691 34.50 17.60 31.84 51.47 7.34 5.23

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,560.5365 1,558.6760 1,550.6627 1,553.5102 1,555.8463
Difference -1.8605 -9.8737 -7.0263 -6.2535

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Texas 109 2,601 1,292 127 234 49.67 20.5 11.1 2,108 730 89 190 65.37 23.7 11.1
Iowa St. 112 2,492 1,154 131 180 46.31 19.0 13.8 2,178 815 106 188 62.58 20.5 11.6
Texas A&M 116 2,623 1,141 157 221 43.50 16.7 11.9 2,404 907 103 196 62.27 23.3 12.3
Oklahoma 125 2,853 1,218 130 177 42.69 21.9 16.1 2,610 967 113 221 62.95 23.1 11.8
Texas Tech 113 2,513 1,158 128 209 46.08 19.6 12.0 2,342 975 132 169 58.37 17.7 13.9
Kansas St. 126 2,782 1,170 153 238 42.06 18.2 11.7 2,677 1,053 121 237 60.67 22.1 11.3
Kansas 111 2,466 1,095 121 181 44.40 20.4 13.6 2,366 990 125 161 58.16 18.9 14.7
Missouri 127 2,791 1,160 166 207 41.56 16.8 13.5 2,764 1,125 153 245 59.30 18.1 11.3
Baylor 126 2,630 1,121 106 211 42.62 24.8 12.5 2,645 1,127 132 215 57.39 20.0 12.3
Conference Average 118 2,639 1,168 135 206 44.32 19.8 12.9 2,455 965 119 202 60.78 20.8 12.2
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the Big 12

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

77.34

2011-11-12 Norman, Okla.
Oklahoma
Baylor
1
3
28
26
25
27
22
25
22
25
GAME

76.80

2011-11-09 Columbia, Mo.
Missouri
Iowa St.
1
3
25
23
12
25
26
28
20
25
GAME

75.54

2011-09-24 Columbia, Mo.
Missouri
Texas A&M
3
1
23
25
25
23
26
24
25
23
GAME

75.13

2011-10-12 College Station, TX
Texas A&M
Oklahoma
3
2
22
25
19
25
25
17
29
27
15
11
GAME

74.82

2011-11-09 Manhattan, Kan.
Kansas St.
Oklahoma
3
2
18
25
25
23
16
25
25
21
15
12
GAME

74.80

2011-11-02 Norman, Okla.
Oklahoma
Iowa St.
1
3
18
25
25
23
21
25
21
25
GAME

74.63

2011-11-19 Waco, Texas
Baylor
Iowa St.
2
3
25
22
12
25
15
25
26
24
12
15
GAME

74.51

2011-09-21 Waco, Texas
Baylor
Oklahoma
1
3
22
25
26
24
24
26
18
25
GAME

74.47

2011-10-28 Austin, Texas
Texas
Iowa St.
3
0
25
14
28
26
25
21
GAME

74.47

2011-09-28 Norman, Okla.
Oklahoma
Texas
3
2
25
16
25
20
17
25
24
26
15
9

HuskerGeek Big 12 All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 30.3886
2 28.7139
3 28.6311
4 26.4571
5 26.2771
6 23.9205
7 23.7298
8 23.7270
9 23.3513
10 22.4016

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 18.3016
2 18.2396
3 17.8423
4 17.5183
5 17.4093
6 16.2602
7 16.2563
8 15.2889
9 13.5328
10 13.4258

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 20.6038
2 19.8238
3 17.2604
4 15.7725
5 15.0765
6 14.4545
7 13.1699
8 12.8513
9 12.7263
10 12.1490

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2575
2 0.2386
3 0.2261
4 0.2238
5 0.2197
6 0.2172
7 0.2133
8 0.2083
9 0.2062
10 0.2031

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1578
2 0.1546
3 0.1506
4 0.1456
5 0.1451
6 0.1405
7 0.1379
8 0.1301
9 0.1251
10 0.1250

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1689
2 0.1612
3 0.1598
4 0.1421
5 0.1266
6 0.1187
7 0.1175
8 0.1107
9 0.1062
10 0.1039


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek