Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

Big 12 - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 1
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Texas 1,720.5071 1,710.1605 1,715.3260 53.92 75.93 0.307
2nd Iowa St. 1,613.6191 1,613.2206 1,613.4198 52.25 68.49 0.196
3rd Kansas 1,600.3381 1,585.6630 1,592.9836 50.84 68.61 0.192
4th Kansas St. 1,597.7246 1,552.6104 1,575.0060 51.38 67.72 0.178
5th Oklahoma 1,556.9997 1,527.4935 1,542.1760 49.03 65.51 0.143
6th Baylor 1,513.5741 1,489.4976 1,501.4876 47.94 62.40 0.109
7th TCU 1,496.9172 1,476.4417 1,486.6442 48.69 61.41 0.113
8th Texas Tech 1,427.7492 1,417.2221 1,422.4759 43.32 60.12 0.023
9th West Virginia 1,325.9014 1,312.6457 1,319.2569 41.65 53.71 -0.048

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Texas 0.3969 48.43 8.74 44.45 41.76 3.04 6.21
2nd Iowa St. 0.3059 42.97 12.38 39.72 42.30 4.49 6.03
3rd Kansas St. 0.3000 42.52 12.52 39.85 43.87 4.94 6.44
4th Kansas 0.2973 42.97 13.24 39.82 42.33 4.41 4.70
5th Oklahoma 0.2824 39.87 11.63 36.77 47.57 5.21 5.55
6th TCU 0.2687 38.69 11.82 35.19 48.95 5.01 6.64
7th Baylor 0.2521 39.49 14.28 36.66 46.29 4.01 4.86
8th Texas Tech 0.2222 37.08 14.86 34.55 48.69 6.04 5.06
9th West Virginia 0.1621 34.04 17.84 31.62 50.41 5.80 6.96

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Texas 0.0898 28.78 19.80 27.85 53.28 9.49 3.43
2nd Kansas 0.1050 29.19 18.68 27.94 54.31 7.81 3.33
3rd Iowa St. 0.1099 27.66 16.66 26.40 57.70 5.70 3.88
4th Kansas St. 0.1224 31.31 19.06 29.80 53.20 8.51 4.62
5th Oklahoma 0.1392 31.55 17.63 29.67 51.32 7.52 4.26
6th Baylor 0.1431 31.54 17.23 28.98 52.95 7.11 5.50
7th TCU 0.1553 33.04 17.51 30.63 50.93 6.64 6.68
8th Texas Tech 0.1995 36.13 16.18 34.07 49.37 6.47 4.73
9th West Virginia 0.2100 37.21 16.20 34.96 47.95 5.40 7.10

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,529.8640 1,533.4562 1,539.6595 1,539.5565 1,535.6340
Difference 3.5922 9.7955 9.6925 7.6934

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Texas 115 2,711 1,248 144 214 46.04 18.8 12.7 2,214 710 92 211 67.93 24.1 10.5
Kansas 123 2,854 1,297 112 166 45.45 25.5 17.2 2,534 952 96 187 62.43 26.4 13.6
Kansas St. 103 2,357 1,081 138 195 45.86 17.1 12.1 2,125 824 106 183 61.22 20.0 11.6
Iowa St. 116 2,592 1,176 139 196 45.37 18.6 13.2 2,341 904 96 177 61.38 24.4 13.2
Baylor 115 2,480 1,105 125 205 44.56 19.8 12.1 2,388 998 140 214 58.21 17.1 11.2
TCU 97 2,057 941 134 138 45.75 15.4 14.9 1,968 856 138 149 56.50 14.3 13.2
Oklahoma 116 2,576 1,117 125 165 43.36 20.6 15.6 2,500 1,028 116 209 58.88 21.6 12.0
Texas Tech 118 2,576 1,105 124 203 42.90 20.8 12.7 2,617 1,144 137 235 56.29 19.1 11.1
West Virginia 108 2,127 876 148 213 41.19 14.4 10.0 2,412 1,185 174 188 50.87 13.9 12.8
Conference Average 112 2,481 1,105 132 188 44.50 19.0 13.4 2,344 956 122 195 59.30 20.1 12.1
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the Big 12

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

78.77

2012-11-24 AMES, Iowa
Iowa St.
Texas
3
2
23
25
25
19
25
21
15
25
15
13
GAME

77.58

2012-10-17 Austin, Texas
Texas
Iowa St.
3
2
26
28
18
25
25
17
25
15
15
9
GAME

74.81

2012-11-10 Lawrence, Kan.
Kansas
Texas
2
3
25
20
15
25
25
22
16
25
12
15
GAME

74.73

2012-11-03 Waco, Texas
Baylor
Kansas
3
1
25
10
27
25
24
26
25
23
GAME

74.40

2012-10-17 Lawrence, Kan.
Kansas
Kansas St.
3
1
26
28
25
15
28
26
25
20
GAME

74.22

2012-09-26 Lawrence, Kan.
Kansas
Iowa St.
3
2
25
19
25
16
23
25
23
25
15
9
GAME

74.11

2012-10-17 Waco, Texas
Baylor
TCU
3
2
25
21
21
25
21
25
25
19
15
13
GAME

73.82

2012-11-07 Manhattan, Kan.
Kansas St.
Kansas
1
3
25
13
26
28
24
26
25
27
GAME

73.62

2012-11-07 Waco, Texas
Baylor
Oklahoma
1
3
21
25
25
23
23
25
23
25
GAME

73.60

2012-11-02 Austin, Texas
Texas
Kansas St.
3
0
25
18
25
22
25
19

HuskerGeek Big 12 All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 25.7003
2 24.1592
3 23.2951
4 22.7719
5 22.4372
6 21.7766
7 21.7240
8 21.6213
9 20.2194
10 20.0414

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 16.5050
2 16.3905
3 15.6154
4 15.5691
5 15.2844
6 15.1306
7 15.1237
8 15.1108
9 14.4470
10 12.9089

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 18.3443
2 18.0991
3 16.3678
4 16.0309
5 12.0206
6 11.1879
7 10.5139
8 9.9150
9 9.8668
10 9.6121

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2211
2 0.2196
3 0.2089
4 0.2042
5 0.2026
6 0.1951
7 0.1873
8 0.1864
9 0.1774
10 0.1770

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1468
2 0.1450
3 0.1389
4 0.1346
5 0.1342
6 0.1316
7 0.1314
8 0.1266
9 0.1245
10 0.1137

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1595
2 0.1521
3 0.1423
4 0.1382
5 0.1064
6 0.1061
7 0.1008
8 0.0985
9 0.0956
10 0.0933


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek