Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

Big 12 - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 1
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Texas 1,776.2949 1,716.3443 1,746.0623 52.76 73.65 0.272
2nd Kansas 1,745.3409 1,669.0165 1,706.7521 51.83 70.72 0.201
3rd Iowa St. 1,713.6917 1,642.2995 1,677.6159 50.22 68.57 0.188
4th Kansas St. 1,699.1825 1,620.7834 1,659.5200 48.61 69.87 0.168
5th Baylor 1,672.0262 1,608.0355 1,639.7187 49.37 64.65 0.139
6th TCU 1,669.8756 1,593.0580 1,631.0146 47.64 66.96 0.143
7th Oklahoma 1,666.4127 1,595.6181 1,630.6313 46.01 67.49 0.125
8th West Virginia 1,617.5091 1,547.9222 1,582.3332 46.26 62.42 0.085
9th Texas Tech 1,594.4365 1,512.3965 1,552.8748 43.90 62.75 0.059

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Texas 0.3842 47.90 9.47 44.63 41.74 3.17 5.76
2nd Iowa St. 0.3113 44.06 12.93 41.20 41.91 5.35 6.27
3rd Kansas St. 0.3063 43.15 12.52 40.72 43.72 5.12 6.49
4th Oklahoma 0.3008 43.44 13.36 40.47 42.60 6.13 4.61
5th Kansas 0.2897 40.71 11.74 38.06 46.79 3.92 7.07
6th TCU 0.2878 39.97 11.19 36.60 48.82 3.85 7.18
7th Baylor 0.2673 40.13 13.40 37.33 45.73 5.59 6.20
8th Texas Tech 0.2454 38.77 14.23 36.32 47.97 5.86 5.50
9th West Virginia 0.2354 39.80 16.26 36.61 43.65 6.69 5.54

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Kansas 0.0886 27.53 18.68 26.07 57.56 7.49 2.93
2nd Texas 0.1122 29.99 18.77 28.50 53.67 8.06 4.10
3rd Iowa St. 0.1230 28.72 16.42 26.47 55.86 6.29 4.41
4th Baylor 0.1280 30.34 17.54 28.28 53.75 7.10 5.08
5th Kansas St. 0.1380 31.17 17.38 29.44 53.88 7.58 2.54
6th TCU 0.1443 31.31 16.88 29.28 53.25 6.90 3.72
7th West Virginia 0.1504 32.53 17.49 30.75 49.58 8.03 4.86
8th Oklahoma 0.1760 34.39 16.79 32.24 50.85 6.58 4.17
9th Texas Tech 0.1865 35.08 16.43 33.11 50.45 5.95 5.27

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,647.3914 1,646.7980 1,647.7001 1,643.4178 1,646.3268
Difference -0.5935 0.3087 -3.9736 -1.4195

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Texas 120 2,714 1,234 117 273 45.47 23.2 9.9 2,321 798 111 251 65.62 20.9 9.2
Kansas 115 2,462 1,122 151 268 45.57 16.3 9.2 2,104 736 68 223 65.02 30.9 9.4
Iowa St. 110 2,452 1,037 118 226 42.29 20.8 10.8 2,318 886 112 238 61.78 20.7 9.7
Kansas St. 119 2,698 1,102 141 241 40.85 19.1 11.2 2,553 947 79 227 62.91 32.3 11.2
Baylor 130 2,731 1,191 144 235 43.61 19.0 11.6 2,604 1,044 140 248 59.91 18.6 10.5
Oklahoma 106 2,393 980 91 133 40.95 26.3 18.0 2,274 861 110 213 62.14 20.7 10.7
TCU 108 2,279 892 129 195 39.14 17.7 11.7 2,321 934 92 203 59.76 25.2 11.4
West Virginia 116 2,477 1,012 110 265 40.86 22.5 9.3 2,557 1,089 135 230 57.41 18.9 11.1
Texas Tech 112 2,332 889 103 184 38.12 22.6 12.7 2,481 1,059 140 237 57.32 17.7 10.5
Conference Average 115 2,504 1,051 123 224 41.87 20.8 11.6 2,393 928 110 230 61.32 22.9 10.4
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the Big 12

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

80.86

2016-09-28 Norman, Okla.
Oklahoma
Texas
1
3
25
22
23
25
20
25
22
25
GAME

80.22

2016-11-16 Fort Worth, Texas
TCU
Baylor
3
2
25
21
23
25
25
23
18
25
15
13
GAME

79.32

2016-11-12 Ames, Iowa
Iowa St.
Texas
3
2
23
25
25
21
20
25
25
21
15
11
GAME

79.05

2016-10-01 Manhattan, Kan.
Kansas St.
Texas
2
3
22
25
27
25
17
25
25
18
12
15
GAME

78.93

2016-10-08 Manhattan, Kan.
Kansas St.
TCU
3
1
33
31
21
25
25
18
25
15
GAME

78.36

2016-11-09 Norman, Okla.
Oklahoma
Iowa St.
1
3
26
28
25
20
22
25
20
25
GAME

78.24

2016-10-08 Austin, TX
Texas
Iowa St.
3
2
25
21
27
25
22
25
21
25
15
10
GAME

78.15

2016-11-19 Lubbock, Texas
Texas Tech
TCU
2
3
28
26
24
26
23
25
25
23
10
15
GAME

78.10

2016-11-05 Norman, Okla.
Oklahoma
Kansas
1
3
25
23
23
25
20
25
25
27
GAME

77.74

2016-10-26 Ames, Iowa
Iowa St.
Kansas St.
3
1
23
25
25
23
26
24
25
15

HuskerGeek Big 12 All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 34.9102
2 30.6307
3 25.9632
4 23.6813
5 23.4240
6 23.3980
7 22.0469
8 21.4851
9 20.6254
10 20.5265

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 22.4940
2 19.1075
3 17.0319
4 15.1293
5 13.8503
6 13.5971
7 13.2941
8 12.7678
9 12.3757
10 12.2675

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 17.7521
2 17.0002
3 16.9991
4 14.6557
5 14.4295
6 14.3072
7 13.3952
8 13.2641
9 12.4161
10 12.1078

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2815
2 0.2574
3 0.2127
4 0.2073
5 0.2061
6 0.2032
7 0.2007
8 0.2004
9 0.1990
10 0.1917

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1814
2 0.1606
3 0.1375
4 0.1352
5 0.1264
6 0.1254
7 0.1236
8 0.1226
9 0.1175
10 0.1115

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1614
2 0.1545
3 0.1349
4 0.1277
5 0.1276
6 0.1263
7 0.1255
8 0.1251
9 0.1108
10 0.1095


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek