Nerdly Nebraska.

2021-2022 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Louisville 1,717.9455

Football georgia 12.7744
Men's Soccer new hampshire 10.6445
Women's Soccer north carolina 11.4036
Women's Volleyball wisconsin 12.1463
Field Hockey penn st 9.6697

Big 12 - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 1
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Texas 1,679.9672 1,688.9002 1,684.4278 81.05 85.27 0.432
2nd Baylor 1,666.5884 1,672.6139 1,669.5984 79.01 82.79 0.433
3rd Texas Tech 1,549.1002 1,553.6181 1,551.3575 73.82 75.73 0.290
4th Iowa St. 1,534.7161 1,545.0627 1,539.8807 75.03 73.28 0.294
5th Kansas St. 1,516.9629 1,526.7306 1,521.8389 67.58 79.85 0.249
6th West Virginia 1,514.2302 1,525.8635 1,520.0357 75.49 73.20 0.250
7th Kansas 1,515.2310 1,522.4973 1,518.8598 74.66 73.60 0.280
8th TCU 1,489.2905 1,501.7502 1,495.5074 73.17 72.34 0.219
9th Oklahoma 1,475.6139 1,481.4126 1,478.5104 69.90 70.98 0.211

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Texas 0.5132 51.71 0.39 47.04 36.58 0.66 14.19
2nd Baylor 0.4956 50.79 1.23 45.60 36.64 1.20 9.01
3rd Texas Tech 0.4393 44.97 1.04 39.88 43.01 1.80 8.50
4th Iowa St. 0.4344 46.23 2.78 42.09 40.82 1.10 10.14
5th Kansas St. 0.4186 46.55 4.69 43.01 39.94 1.22 10.44
6th Kansas 0.4029 44.39 4.10 40.41 43.42 3.13 9.79
7th Oklahoma 0.3844 44.03 5.59 39.76 39.45 3.12 8.71
8th TCU 0.3830 45.23 6.93 41.62 38.03 4.77 10.46
9th West Virginia 0.3791 43.88 5.97 38.94 40.76 3.01 9.08

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Baylor 0.0625 21.21 14.96 20.01 59.78 11.45 2.50
2nd Texas 0.0808 23.14 15.06 21.31 59.91 10.42 3.85
3rd Kansas 0.1229 24.47 12.19 22.91 59.03 9.55 4.09
4th West Virginia 0.1287 23.75 10.88 20.82 61.04 9.02 1.41
5th Iowa St. 0.1400 25.50 11.50 23.48 59.06 9.19 4.49
6th Texas Tech 0.1495 26.66 11.71 24.03 56.99 9.05 3.83
7th TCU 0.1640 27.94 11.53 25.72 55.69 10.87 6.20
8th Kansas St. 0.1692 26.56 9.65 25.51 58.54 8.62 3.91
9th Oklahoma 0.1739 26.97 9.58 24.23 57.46 8.56 4.43

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,553.3352 1,545.2969 1,530.3945 1,527.2518 1,539.0696
Difference -8.0383 -22.9407 -26.0834 -19.0208

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Texas 31 659 354 72 93 53.72 9.2 7.1 521 197 37 80 62.19 14.1 6.5
West Virginia 44 953 533 77 92 55.93 12.4 10.4 775 351 26 75 54.71 29.8 10.3
Baylor 37 718 341 35 72 47.49 20.5 10.0 649 257 37 85 60.40 17.5 7.6
Iowa St. 46 910 480 66 84 52.75 13.8 10.8 806 376 58 78 53.35 13.9 10.3
Texas Tech 54 858 426 58 96 49.65 14.8 8.9 802 363 54 94 54.74 14.9 8.5
Kansas 47 868 442 65 96 50.92 13.4 9.0 815 384 51 89 52.88 16.0 9.2
TCU 43 678 354 55 88 52.21 12.3 7.7 643 315 60 92 51.01 10.7 7.0
Kansas St. 50 1,017 448 72 114 44.05 14.1 8.9 976 405 57 103 58.50 17.1 9.5
Oklahoma 52 1,056 500 55 130 47.35 19.2 8.1 1,073 520 72 95 51.54 14.9 11.3
Conference Average 45 857 431 62 96 50.45 14.4 9.0 784 352 50 88 55.48 16.5 8.9
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the Big 12

HuskerGeek Big 12 All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
A
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 8.9982
2 8.8820
3 8.7067
4 8.2789
5 8.1816
6 7.7562
7 7.7066
8 7.5365
9 7.2534
10 7.2005

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 6.5381
2 5.7848
3 5.5764
4 5.2352
5 5.1314
6 5.0840
7 4.7477
8 4.6809
9 4.5325
10 4.4192

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 7.1357
2 6.0312
3 5.5465
4 5.1415
5 4.5014
6 3.9076
7 3.8450
8 3.7706
9 3.6468
10 3.6227

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2660
2 0.2307
3 0.2238
4 0.2217
5 0.2166
6 0.2083
7 0.2036
8 0.2030
9 0.1996
10 0.1960

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1676
2 0.1608
3 0.1507
4 0.1416
5 0.1387
6 0.1300
7 0.1293
8 0.1283
9 0.1277
10 0.1261

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1487
2 0.1387
3 0.1340
4 0.1318
5 0.1292
6 0.1217
7 0.1052
8 0.1039
9 0.1002
10 0.0943


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek