Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

Big Sky - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 1
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Northern Ariz. 1,581.4383 1,554.8635 1,568.0946 46.64 63.20 0.106
2nd Idaho 1,541.3078 1,510.7402 1,525.9475 45.60 60.12 0.090
3rd Northern Colo. 1,531.2677 1,502.1935 1,516.6609 45.17 59.60 0.040
4th Weber St. 1,509.5855 1,488.2486 1,498.8791 43.20 60.53 0.033
5th Sacramento St. 1,503.3998 1,477.5853 1,490.4367 44.66 57.85 0.031
6th Idaho St. 1,496.5002 1,474.2470 1,485.3319 42.13 60.03 0.037
7th Montana 1,443.7390 1,417.3273 1,430.4722 39.60 55.99 -0.037
8th Montana St. 1,443.2655 1,411.6583 1,427.3744 38.75 56.44 -0.045
9th Southern Utah 1,438.3421 1,412.3565 1,425.2901 39.14 55.27 -0.032
10th Portland St. 1,415.5280 1,384.9748 1,400.1681 39.97 53.46 -0.044
11th Eastern Wash. 1,366.4023 1,336.0578 1,351.1449 37.00 51.05 -0.121

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Idaho 0.2660 38.10 11.50 35.68 49.90 4.41 5.04
2nd Northern Ariz. 0.2612 35.77 9.65 33.88 53.21 4.39 6.66
3rd Idaho St. 0.2362 37.68 14.05 35.80 47.58 6.81 5.55
4th Weber St. 0.2315 36.81 13.66 34.33 50.67 5.55 7.51
5th Northern Colo. 0.2158 35.99 14.41 33.97 48.76 4.58 6.61
6th Sacramento St. 0.2077 34.37 13.60 31.82 53.16 4.63 7.61
7th Southern Utah 0.1957 33.19 13.61 30.91 54.61 5.37 5.48
8th Montana 0.1840 35.06 16.67 32.93 48.78 6.54 5.59
9th Montana St. 0.1839 33.53 15.14 31.20 52.22 6.19 5.72
10th Portland St. 0.1828 32.21 13.93 29.96 55.31 5.35 5.59
11th Eastern Wash. 0.1335 29.10 15.75 26.69 56.83 6.51 5.39

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Northern Ariz. 0.1557 32.63 17.06 30.83 54.22 6.19 5.00
2nd Idaho 0.1761 34.37 16.76 31.99 49.97 7.03 6.05
3rd Northern Colo. 0.1763 33.00 15.37 30.72 54.53 3.58 4.59
4th Sacramento St. 0.1767 33.77 16.10 32.08 51.44 7.06 6.11
5th Weber St. 0.1983 36.67 16.84 34.74 48.17 7.22 5.47
6th Idaho St. 0.1991 36.70 16.80 34.74 48.92 6.77 6.35
7th Montana 0.2214 36.91 14.77 34.35 47.96 5.73 6.34
8th Portland St. 0.2269 37.85 15.15 35.48 47.35 5.38 7.93
9th Southern Utah 0.2281 37.51 14.70 35.39 48.81 5.25 6.47
10th Montana St. 0.2285 38.15 15.30 35.58 47.60 5.43 5.25
11th Eastern Wash. 0.2546 39.62 14.15 37.10 45.95 4.81 7.34

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,465.4364 1,466.7290 1,467.7779 1,466.4989 1,466.6105
Difference 1.2926 2.3415 1.0625 1.5655

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Northern Ariz. 132 3,029 1,408 202 265 46.48 15.0 11.4 2,677 1,022 144 200 61.82 18.6 13.4
Idaho 123 2,814 1,286 142 266 45.70 19.8 10.6 2,605 1,064 170 220 59.16 15.3 11.8
Northern Colo. 111 2,472 1,162 166 202 47.01 14.9 12.2 2,309 975 119 200 57.77 19.4 11.5
Idaho St. 125 2,741 1,193 164 189 43.52 16.7 14.5 2,622 1,071 178 190 59.15 14.7 13.8
Weber St. 105 2,344 1,022 179 185 43.60 13.1 12.7 2,251 923 130 189 59.00 17.3 11.9
Sacramento St. 120 2,594 1,144 201 256 44.10 12.9 10.1 2,558 1,110 167 190 56.61 15.3 13.5
Montana St. 113 2,371 941 143 210 39.69 16.6 11.3 2,537 1,124 133 214 55.70 19.1 11.9
Montana 114 2,395 950 133 195 39.67 18.0 12.3 2,610 1,185 177 228 54.60 14.7 11.4
Southern Utah 112 2,294 880 126 280 38.36 18.2 8.2 2,596 1,202 186 232 53.70 14.0 11.2
Eastern Wash. 105 2,142 853 127 148 39.82 16.9 14.5 2,443 1,173 180 249 51.99 13.6 9.8
Portland St. 107 2,124 827 115 156 38.94 18.5 13.6 2,477 1,200 205 226 51.55 12.1 11.0
Conference Average 115 2,484 1,061 154 214 42.44 16.4 11.9 2,517 1,095 163 213 56.46 15.8 11.9
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the Big Sky

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

78.53

2018-10-13 Greeley, Colo.
Northern Colo.
Northern Ariz.
3
2
25
18
22
25
27
29
25
23
15
6
GAME

77.52

2018-09-20 Flagstaff, Ariz.
Northern Ariz.
Idaho St.
2
3
28
30
25
23
24
26
25
22
8
15
GAME

73.33

2018-11-23 Greeley, CO
Idaho
Northern Colo.
3
2
25
21
17
25
25
23
18
25
15
10
GAME

72.16

2018-10-08 Cedar City, Utah
Southern Utah
Northern Ariz.
1
3
25
27
19
25
25
23
17
25
GAME

71.59

2018-11-10 Flagstaff, Ariz.
Northern Ariz.
Northern Colo.
3
2
25
22
21
25
25
19
22
25
15
6
GAME

71.41

2018-11-10 Pocatello, Idaho
Idaho St.
Sacramento St.
3
1
18
25
27
25
25
18
25
20
GAME

71.25

2018-10-30 Ogden, UT
Weber St.
Idaho St.
2
3
25
27
25
19
19
25
25
23
10
15
GAME

71.24

2018-09-20 Cedar City, Utah
Southern Utah
Weber St.
1
3
25
23
21
25
24
26
23
25
GAME

71.23

2018-10-27 Moscow, Idaho
Idaho
Weber St.
3
1
25
18
21
25
27
25
25
20
GAME

71.05

2018-11-15 Flagstaff, Ariz.
Northern Ariz.
Idaho
3
0
27
25
26
24
25
19

HuskerGeek Big Sky All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 33.8713
2 27.3002
3 22.8174
4 22.6260
5 22.3942
6 21.7938
7 21.5479
8 21.4485
9 21.3134
10 21.2680

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 19.0588
2 16.0938
3 15.1218
4 14.8072
5 14.6846
6 14.6842
7 14.1511
8 13.9430
9 13.7359
10 13.4969

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 20.7780
2 20.6426
3 20.6421
4 19.4912
5 19.1871
6 18.5633
7 16.7513
8 15.0728
9 14.1749
10 13.8466

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2566
2 0.2220
3 0.2076
4 0.2002
5 0.1941
6 0.1915
7 0.1886
8 0.1865
9 0.1857
10 0.1816

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1549
2 0.1410
3 0.1288
4 0.1229
5 0.1224
6 0.1223
7 0.1216
8 0.1177
9 0.1171
10 0.1162

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1827
2 0.1719
3 0.1662
4 0.1585
5 0.1564
6 0.1496
7 0.1454
8 0.1442
9 0.1299
10 0.1222


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek