Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

Big Sky - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 1
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Northern Colo. 1,543.3292 1,549.8873 1,546.6048 52.35 57.62 0.124
2nd Portland St. 1,501.0821 1,506.8702 1,503.9734 52.32 53.58 0.075
3rd Sacramento St. 1,486.8183 1,493.2819 1,490.0466 50.61 53.71 0.058
4th Weber St. 1,478.3095 1,486.8180 1,482.5576 53.82 52.48 0.065
5th Montana St. 1,442.5302 1,447.8900 1,445.2076 49.01 51.04 0.000
6th Montana 1,432.2338 1,438.3825 1,435.3048 48.74 51.14 0.003
7th Eastern Wash. 1,411.3662 1,420.2280 1,415.7902 47.36 51.59 -0.033
8th Northern Ariz. 1,395.9253 1,407.0110 1,401.4572 49.68 52.87 -0.010
9th Idaho St. 1,391.6177 1,402.1063 1,396.8521 49.94 48.94 -0.026
10th Idaho 1,327.5946 1,333.6453 1,330.6165 45.50 45.43 -0.073

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Northern Colo. 0.2928 41.86 12.58 38.77 43.39 6.63 6.63
2nd Portland St. 0.2474 38.82 14.08 35.96 47.46 5.52 7.31
3rd Sacramento St. 0.2217 36.10 13.93 32.86 49.98 4.65 7.28
4th Weber St. 0.2172 33.55 11.83 30.75 51.53 4.73 6.93
5th Northern Ariz. 0.2123 32.65 11.42 30.01 53.15 5.03 6.12
6th Montana 0.2080 35.13 14.33 32.21 49.28 6.29 7.14
7th Eastern Wash. 0.2012 35.64 15.53 33.06 48.50 5.66 7.93
8th Montana St. 0.1961 34.24 14.63 31.45 50.54 5.73 6.93
9th Idaho 0.1921 35.34 16.13 32.42 48.90 6.71 6.60
10th Idaho St. 0.1764 32.38 14.74 30.05 53.52 6.16 6.65

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Weber St. 0.1527 32.15 16.89 30.49 50.79 7.11 5.63
2nd Sacramento St. 0.1638 34.65 18.27 32.11 48.64 7.86 7.00
3rd Northern Colo. 0.1688 34.10 17.22 31.78 50.41 6.89 6.04
4th Portland St. 0.1722 33.12 15.90 30.73 52.55 5.25 6.49
5th Montana St. 0.1958 35.93 16.35 33.72 49.06 6.22 5.96
6th Idaho St. 0.2027 37.18 16.91 34.92 45.63 6.20 7.22
7th Montana 0.2051 36.05 15.55 32.99 49.05 5.98 7.31
8th Northern Ariz. 0.2222 38.25 16.02 36.26 45.37 5.00 5.28
9th Eastern Wash. 0.2343 39.43 16.00 36.90 45.41 6.26 6.53
10th Idaho 0.2652 42.27 15.75 37.70 41.62 6.88 8.60

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,444.8411 1,446.3987 1,445.0607 1,444.7151 1,445.2539
Difference 1.5576 0.2196 -0.1260 0.5504

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Northern Colo. 120 2,707 1,381 174 246 51.02 15.6 11.0 2,412 1,066 156 189 55.80 15.5 12.8
Weber St. 111 2,513 1,335 166 221 53.12 15.1 11.4 2,351 1,153 136 212 50.96 17.3 11.1
Portland St. 118 2,639 1,341 187 244 50.82 14.1 10.8 2,505 1,203 175 226 51.98 14.3 11.1
Sacramento St. 120 2,666 1,326 199 251 49.74 13.4 10.6 2,528 1,209 191 262 52.18 13.2 9.6
Montana 106 2,339 1,163 170 211 49.72 13.8 11.1 2,293 1,134 166 210 50.55 13.8 10.9
Northern Ariz. 92 1,900 930 117 171 48.95 16.2 11.1 2,056 1,006 116 149 51.07 17.7 13.8
Idaho St. 118 2,520 1,279 167 164 50.75 15.1 15.4 2,651 1,380 194 222 47.94 13.7 11.9
Montana St. 122 2,628 1,277 181 249 48.59 14.5 10.6 2,662 1,335 166 256 49.85 16.0 10.4
Eastern Wash. 110 2,202 1,056 176 233 47.96 12.5 9.5 2,303 1,151 153 213 50.02 15.1 10.8
Idaho 98 1,930 869 125 210 45.03 15.4 9.2 2,294 1,263 201 170 44.94 11.4 13.5
Conference Average 112 2,404 1,196 166 220 49.57 14.6 11.1 2,406 1,190 165 211 50.53 14.8 11.6
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the Big Sky

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

75.41

2022-11-12
Northern Colo.
Weber St.
3
2
25
11
25
18
23
25
18
25
21
19
GAME

73.18

2022-10-01
Northern Colo.
Sacramento St.
3
1
23
25
27
25
25
23
25
21
GAME

72.19

2022-10-08
Northern Ariz.
Northern Colo.
3
2
25
23
25
21
18
25
18
25
16
14
GAME

71.02

2022-11-18
Sacramento St.
Portland St.
2
3
26
24
19
25
21
25
25
21
9
15
GAME

71.02

2022-11-26 Ogden, UT
Northern Colo.
Portland St.
3
2
23
25
25
23
25
27
25
15
15
6
GAME

70.99

2022-11-19
Weber St.
Montana
3
1
25
9
24
26
25
23
25
23
GAME

70.75

2022-10-28
Eastern Wash.
Montana St.
3
2
25
22
26
28
19
25
25
23
15
11
GAME

70.18

2022-11-05
Montana St.
Portland St.
3
2
25
22
22
25
19
25
26
24
15
11
GAME

70.16

2022-09-22
Idaho St.
Northern Colo.
3
2
14
25
20
25
26
24
25
23
15
11
GAME

69.77

2022-11-17
Idaho
Northern Ariz.
2
3
25
23
23
25
25
23
20
25
13
15

HuskerGeek Big Sky All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 27.3901
2 26.4669
3 24.8839
4 23.9387
5 23.7162
6 22.8078
7 20.7220
8 20.3222
9 19.6146
10 19.1957

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 17.5257
2 15.4131
3 15.2941
4 14.2295
5 14.0494
6 12.3717
7 11.7325
8 11.6717
9 11.4380
10 11.1734

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 17.0983
2 15.3733
3 15.3565
4 15.0768
5 14.7708
6 14.1240
7 13.6348
8 13.4432
9 12.5428
10 11.0538

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2384
2 0.2314
3 0.2283
4 0.2252
5 0.2216
6 0.2152
7 0.2074
8 0.2029
9 0.1935
10 0.1777

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1460
2 0.1443
3 0.1389
4 0.1345
5 0.1336
6 0.1191
7 0.1186
8 0.1128
9 0.1101
10 0.1089

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1461
2 0.1449
3 0.1449
4 0.1319
5 0.1311
6 0.1281
7 0.1272
8 0.1236
9 0.1172
10 0.1112


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek