Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

Big Ten - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 1
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Nebraska 1,819.0441 1,712.6518 1,765.0465 54.25 74.63 0.267
2nd Wisconsin 1,801.6989 1,701.8295 1,751.0523 53.21 73.97 0.261
3rd Penn St. 1,802.5736 1,684.0214 1,742.2894 54.76 72.78 0.267
4th Minnesota 1,797.2564 1,685.4350 1,740.4479 53.93 72.73 0.250
5th Illinois 1,762.5918 1,645.4264 1,703.0018 53.42 69.56 0.207
6th Ohio St. 1,743.8031 1,628.2985 1,685.0614 51.77 69.59 0.216
7th Purdue 1,737.2333 1,621.4521 1,678.3446 50.82 67.78 0.196
8th Michigan St. 1,730.1194 1,622.0474 1,675.2121 50.25 68.37 0.183
9th Michigan 1,724.1553 1,619.8869 1,671.2081 50.07 68.57 0.168
10th Northwestern 1,681.0395 1,562.1543 1,620.5071 48.27 65.74 0.133
11th Indiana 1,654.1267 1,548.6368 1,600.5129 46.56 63.02 0.084
12th Iowa 1,663.8342 1,537.9795 1,599.6696 46.21 65.48 0.121
13th Maryland 1,635.7442 1,525.7293 1,579.7793 44.06 63.82 0.055
14th Rutgers 1,541.4378 1,438.9070 1,489.2903 40.32 57.38 -0.020

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Penn St. 0.3587 46.59 10.72 43.15 42.17 3.74 5.95
2nd Nebraska 0.3488 45.29 10.41 41.53 42.17 3.76 5.93
3rd Minnesota 0.3442 44.77 10.35 42.17 43.16 4.12 5.87
4th Wisconsin 0.3438 46.11 11.73 43.60 40.22 4.76 5.22
5th Purdue 0.3198 45.02 13.04 41.93 40.84 3.93 6.23
6th Ohio St. 0.3114 43.92 12.78 40.61 43.11 4.41 6.25
7th Michigan St. 0.3088 45.03 14.15 41.60 41.11 5.12 6.18
8th Illinois 0.3055 42.95 12.40 40.08 43.16 4.91 4.51
9th Michigan 0.2998 42.77 12.79 39.93 42.80 5.37 4.78
10th Iowa 0.2852 42.18 13.66 39.80 43.61 6.28 6.46
11th Northwestern 0.2775 41.74 13.99 38.65 43.55 6.00 6.45
12th Indiana 0.2517 41.41 16.24 38.35 40.98 5.66 7.10
13th Maryland 0.2474 39.54 14.80 36.74 45.71 6.01 7.61
14th Rutgers 0.2027 36.37 16.09 33.79 49.55 5.87 6.07

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Nebraska 0.0818 26.77 18.59 25.42 56.87 8.45 2.59
2nd Wisconsin 0.0832 27.30 18.98 26.12 56.85 8.54 3.84
3rd Penn St. 0.0915 29.65 20.50 28.31 54.68 9.46 3.91
4th Minnesota 0.0943 28.06 18.63 27.09 55.55 8.45 3.87
5th Ohio St. 0.0952 28.11 18.59 26.86 56.48 8.23 4.95
6th Illinois 0.0980 29.09 19.29 27.66 54.50 8.71 2.99
7th Purdue 0.1238 30.83 18.45 28.66 53.54 7.61 5.57
8th Michigan St. 0.1262 30.92 18.30 29.13 54.14 8.28 4.85
9th Michigan 0.1317 30.20 17.04 28.90 55.20 6.75 3.72
10th Northwestern 0.1446 31.28 16.81 28.91 54.45 6.79 4.46
11th Iowa 0.1637 32.95 16.58 30.72 53.49 5.82 4.26
12th Indiana 0.1677 33.21 16.44 30.39 51.46 6.72 3.65
13th Maryland 0.1928 35.64 16.35 34.02 49.60 6.97 3.95
14th Rutgers 0.2231 36.53 14.21 33.79 49.49 6.51 5.71

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,664.3874 1,670.5905 1,671.6255 1,671.7870 1,669.5976
Difference 6.2032 7.2381 7.3996 6.9470

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Penn St. 115 2,691 1,284 129 183 47.72 20.9 14.7 2,167 735 94 232 66.08 23.1 9.3
Nebraska 129 3,051 1,387 140 232 45.46 21.8 13.2 2,544 850 79 237 66.59 32.2 10.7
Wisconsin 117 2,707 1,211 107 201 44.74 25.3 13.5 2,315 782 94 222 66.22 24.6 10.4
Minnesota 129 3,005 1,374 142 160 45.72 21.2 18.8 2,570 901 105 190 64.94 24.5 13.5
Illinois 122 2,785 1,262 93 138 45.31 29.9 20.2 2,484 953 81 231 61.63 30.7 10.8
Ohio St. 131 2,924 1,286 147 268 43.98 19.9 10.9 2,681 1,026 138 229 61.73 19.4 11.7
Purdue 122 2,796 1,243 145 224 44.46 19.3 12.5 2,564 994 155 214 61.23 16.5 12.0
Michigan St. 119 2,667 1,141 132 246 42.78 20.2 10.8 2,524 981 132 231 61.13 19.1 10.9
Michigan 123 2,774 1,165 94 158 42.00 29.5 17.6 2,654 1,043 109 210 60.70 24.3 12.6
Northwestern 107 2,323 946 119 223 40.72 19.5 10.4 2,363 983 114 191 58.40 20.7 12.4
Indiana 116 2,491 1,017 153 300 40.83 16.3 8.3 2,556 1,092 101 210 57.28 25.3 12.2
Iowa 115 2,461 958 134 257 38.93 18.4 9.6 2,587 1,085 126 213 58.06 20.5 12.1
Maryland 122 2,600 1,008 177 276 38.77 14.7 9.4 2,737 1,153 117 250 57.87 23.4 10.9
Rutgers 109 2,072 713 105 203 34.41 19.7 10.2 2,582 1,261 158 182 51.16 16.3 14.2
Conference Average 120 2,668 1,143 130 219 42.56 21.2 12.9 2,523 989 115 217 60.93 22.9 11.7
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the Big Ten

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

86.37

2015-10-23 Lincoln, Nebraska
Nebraska
Minnesota
1
3
23
25
22
25
26
24
25
27
GAME

83.06

2015-11-25 Minneapolis, MN
Minnesota
Ohio St.
3
2
25
27
29
31
25
17
25
15
15
9
GAME

82.18

2015-11-21 West Lafayette, Ind.
Purdue
Minnesota
3
2
25
22
25
19
32
34
19
25
15
9
GAME

82.17

2015-11-18 Champaign, Ill.
Illinois
Wisconsin
2
3
22
25
25
10
22
25
28
26
12
15
GAME

81.74

2015-10-24 Ann Arbor, Mich.
Michigan
Ohio St.
1
3
23
25
25
23
26
28
26
28
GAME

81.23

2015-11-11 East Lansing, Mich.
Michigan St.
Nebraska
2
3
19
25
29
27
25
23
18
25
14
16
GAME

81.21

2015-10-17 Minneapolis, MN
Minnesota
Wisconsin
3
1
25
20
25
23
19
25
25
19
GAME

80.63

2015-11-27 Ann Arbor, Mich.
Michigan
Illinois
3
1
23
25
25
22
27
25
25
20
GAME

80.01

2015-10-02 University Park, Pa.
Penn St.
Nebraska
2
3
25
12
26
24
14
25
20
25
11
15
GAME

79.99

2015-10-14 Madison, Wis.
Wisconsin
Minnesota
2
3
25
11
24
26
16
25
26
24
11
15

HuskerGeek Big Ten All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 31.9476
2 28.7417
3 28.3029
4 27.9866
5 27.7496
6 24.9458
7 24.7468
8 23.4809
9 23.0578
10 22.2044

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 19.6470
2 19.4375
3 18.6854
4 18.3615
5 16.3358
6 16.0389
7 15.4007
8 15.3686
9 14.9059
10 14.6071

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 16.9492
2 16.8692
3 16.6216
4 16.5362
5 16.3896
6 15.7287
7 15.5518
8 15.3426
9 12.3006
10 12.2238

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2477
2 0.2372
3 0.2313
4 0.2245
5 0.2194
6 0.2135
7 0.2114
8 0.2040
9 0.2022
10 0.1993

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1523
2 0.1519
3 0.1517
4 0.1448
5 0.1396
6 0.1393
7 0.1359
8 0.1283
9 0.1272
10 0.1260

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1532
2 0.1467
3 0.1362
4 0.1311
5 0.1294
6 0.1289
7 0.1282
8 0.1275
9 0.1065
10 0.1054


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek