Nerdly Nebraska.

2021-2022 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Louisville 1,717.9455

Football georgia 12.7744
Men's Soccer new hampshire 10.6445
Women's Soccer north carolina 11.4036
Women's Volleyball wisconsin 12.1463
Field Hockey penn st 9.6697

C2C - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st UC Santa Cruz 1,606.8707 1,608.8396 1,607.8548 73.79 69.30 0.098
2nd Chris. Newport 1,492.7355 1,486.3246 1,489.5266 61.28 73.77 0.002
3rd Mary Washington 1,483.6309 1,477.7484 1,480.6867 69.47 60.46 -0.032
4th Salisbury 1,456.8582 1,457.1247 1,456.9914 66.40 60.90 -0.021
5th Pratt 1,190.4225 1,188.2658 1,189.3437 59.86 52.07 -0.314
6th Mount Mary 1,174.3018 1,176.1135 1,175.2073 55.53 51.98 -0.314
7th Finlandia 1,158.8256 1,167.0102 1,162.9107 54.97 48.66 -0.288
8th Mills 1,015.7567 1,016.8068 1,016.2816 55.85 37.95 -0.489

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st UC Santa Cruz 0.3493 38.48 3.54 34.48 49.12 3.87 10.16
2nd Chris. Newport 0.2709 35.83 8.73 31.63 48.21 6.05 10.72
3rd Salisbury 0.2379 32.01 8.22 29.91 50.01 5.10 6.95
4th Mary Washington 0.2298 33.05 10.07 29.01 54.10 6.01 8.97
5th Finlandia 0.1128 18.62 7.34 17.12 71.99 6.00 4.88
6th Pratt 0.0806 22.20 14.14 20.47 61.44 7.15 8.35
7th Mount Mary 0.0552 19.45 13.93 17.34 67.54 6.85 4.70
8th Mills -0.0130 11.98 13.27 11.40 74.24 5.30 3.67

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st UC Santa Cruz 0.2513 32.57 7.45 29.70 50.93 4.70 8.16
2nd Salisbury 0.2592 34.11 8.19 31.70 49.06 5.31 4.35
3rd Mary Washington 0.2616 33.15 6.98 29.41 51.56 4.78 7.47
4th Chris. Newport 0.2687 34.09 7.21 28.24 52.45 4.05 8.46
5th Mount Mary 0.3687 42.38 5.51 37.25 41.50 2.36 11.11
6th Pratt 0.3946 43.83 4.37 40.12 41.23 1.82 12.17
7th Finlandia 0.4010 44.20 4.10 39.88 45.84 3.20 16.22
8th Mills 0.4759 49.59 2.01 44.93 38.43 -0.22 26.70

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,322.3504 1,325.7777 1,325.5573 1,323.1675 1,324.2132
Difference 3.4274 3.2069 0.8172 2.4838

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
UC Santa Cruz 44 972 564 119 83 58.03 8.2 11.7 770 368 63 79 52.21 12.2 9.7
Chris. Newport 50 822 405 140 164 49.27 5.9 5.0 736 300 75 96 59.24 9.8 7.7
Pratt 30 507 317 96 63 62.53 5.3 8.0 423 231 58 72 45.39 7.3 5.9
Salisbury 43 649 345 79 77 53.16 8.2 8.4 582 288 55 75 50.52 10.6 7.8
Mary Washington 61 843 462 116 81 54.80 7.3 10.4 816 451 102 138 44.73 8.0 5.9
Mount Mary 62 752 380 122 137 50.53 6.2 5.5 869 483 128 143 44.42 6.8 6.1
Finlandia 39 543 275 73 75 50.65 7.4 7.2 642 370 124 91 42.37 5.2 7.1
Mills 15 111 42 8 24 37.84 13.9 4.6 293 221 90 37 24.57 3.3 7.9
Conference Average 43 650 349 94 88 52.10 7.8 7.6 641 339 87 91 45.43 7.9 7.3
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the C2C

HuskerGeek C2C All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 7.7351
2 5.9616
3 5.7270
4 5.1865
5 5.0540
6 4.6521
7 4.1283
8 4.0836
9 4.0278
10 3.9675

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 4.4829
2 4.4379
3 3.0707
4 2.9954
5 2.8480
6 2.7594
7 2.7377
8 2.5212
9 2.4383
10 2.4285

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 4.8621
2 4.7379
3 4.0172
4 3.3936
5 3.2971
6 3.2852
7 3.2585
8 3.0808
9 3.0528
10 2.9332

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2149
2 0.1975
3 0.1807
4 0.1454
5 0.1410
6 0.1402
7 0.1360
8 0.1296
9 0.1296
10 0.1280

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1358
2 0.1233
3 0.1059
4 0.0919
5 0.0875
6 0.0869
7 0.0836
8 0.0810
9 0.0782
10 0.0780

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1473
2 0.1215
3 0.1170
4 0.1112
5 0.1100
6 0.1086
7 0.1086
8 0.1031
9 0.0985
10 0.0916


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek