Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

CAA - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 1
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Hofstra 1,567.3165 1,531.5244 1,549.3171 45.42 62.51 0.079
2nd Col. of Charleston 1,558.5553 1,532.1943 1,545.3186 44.66 63.20 0.063
3rd James Madison 1,557.1789 1,524.6722 1,540.8398 45.57 61.28 0.067
4th Towson 1,509.5271 1,483.7789 1,496.5976 42.82 59.56 0.039
5th UNCW 1,500.9779 1,469.2425 1,485.0254 44.56 57.01 0.020
6th Northeastern 1,472.9665 1,442.8635 1,457.8373 40.76 56.51 -0.042
7th Delaware 1,443.9934 1,418.5434 1,431.2118 40.55 55.44 -0.044
8th Elon 1,439.9490 1,405.6824 1,422.7125 39.55 55.70 -0.061
9th William & Mary 1,377.1952 1,344.6464 1,360.8235 38.63 49.05 -0.115

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Col. of Charleston 0.2630 39.95 13.65 37.94 46.60 5.46 4.66
2nd Hofstra 0.2592 40.42 14.50 37.93 45.90 5.51 7.67
3rd James Madison 0.2319 36.45 13.26 33.67 49.89 4.95 6.10
4th Towson 0.2306 38.10 15.04 35.75 46.52 6.15 5.50
5th UNCW 0.2039 33.86 13.47 31.50 54.19 5.10 6.82
6th Northeastern 0.1754 34.76 17.23 32.83 48.47 6.22 5.84
7th Delaware 0.1733 32.57 15.24 30.88 53.20 6.03 5.83
8th Elon 0.1592 32.01 16.09 30.19 52.03 5.86 5.87
9th William & Mary 0.1363 32.67 19.04 30.98 49.88 7.25 6.28

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st James Madison 0.1648 32.88 16.41 30.14 51.24 6.98 4.02
2nd Hofstra 0.1805 33.19 15.14 30.51 52.83 6.01 5.68
3rd UNCW 0.1841 34.55 16.14 32.03 48.12 6.97 6.13
4th Towson 0.1915 33.45 14.30 31.17 51.98 6.44 5.56
5th Col. of Charleston 0.1998 34.31 14.34 32.18 52.46 4.80 5.04
6th Northeastern 0.2170 36.12 14.42 33.38 50.43 4.57 5.25
7th Delaware 0.2178 34.66 12.88 32.32 52.93 4.49 4.48
8th Elon 0.2197 36.53 14.56 33.82 49.37 4.78 5.47
9th William & Mary 0.2514 39.89 14.75 36.15 46.45 4.93 8.58

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,476.6315 1,482.7919 1,482.3024 1,479.8201 1,480.3865
Difference 6.1603 5.6709 3.1886 5.0066

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Hofstra 127 2,865 1,308 214 264 45.65 13.4 10.9 2,555 982 149 179 61.57 17.1 14.3
James Madison 112 2,586 1,192 159 209 46.09 16.3 12.4 2,337 920 98 169 60.63 23.8 13.8
Col. of Charleston 135 3,074 1,367 141 151 44.47 21.8 20.4 2,831 1,102 151 232 61.07 18.7 12.2
Towson 123 2,552 1,107 142 226 43.38 18.0 11.3 2,471 1,022 160 197 58.64 15.4 12.5
Northeastern 109 2,354 1,006 142 175 42.74 16.6 13.5 2,399 1,051 129 176 56.19 18.6 13.6
Elon 100 2,140 911 132 122 42.57 16.2 17.5 2,182 953 119 189 56.32 18.3 11.5
UNCW 99 2,082 951 144 190 45.68 14.5 11.0 2,117 992 137 147 53.14 15.5 14.4
Delaware 107 2,296 974 141 181 42.42 16.3 12.7 2,361 1,049 111 178 55.57 21.3 13.3
William & Mary 89 1,755 721 117 164 41.08 15.0 10.7 2,056 1,039 180 145 49.47 11.4 14.2
Conference Average 111 2,412 1,060 148 187 43.79 16.4 13.4 2,368 1,012 137 179 56.96 17.8 13.3
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the CAA

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

74.76

2018-10-25 Charleston, S.C.
Col. of Charleston
James Madison
1
3
25
20
27
29
22
25
21
25
GAME

74.49

2018-11-17 Charleston, S.C.
Col. of Charleston
James Madison
1
3
19
25
26
28
25
22
25
27
GAME

73.65

2018-10-21 Hempstead, New York
Hofstra
James Madison
3
1
20
25
25
22
28
26
25
13
GAME

73.11

2018-10-14 Newark, Delaware
Delaware
Hofstra
1
3
21
25
28
26
15
25
24
26
GAME

72.76

2018-10-05 Charleston, S.C.
Col. of Charleston
Hofstra
1
3
25
23
16
25
27
29
17
25
GAME

72.75

2018-10-27 Charleston, S.C.
Col. of Charleston
Towson
3
2
25
21
19
25
24
26
25
15
15
12
GAME

72.75

2018-10-21 BOSTON, MASS.
Northeastern
Towson
3
2
26
24
22
25
19
25
25
21
15
12
GAME

72.25

2018-09-22 Harrisonburg, Va.
James Madison
Hofstra
3
2
25
19
24
26
25
19
22
25
15
10
GAME

71.60

2018-10-28 Charleston, S.C.
Col. of Charleston
Delaware
3
1
25
16
24
26
25
19
25
23
GAME

71.60

2018-11-18 Charleston, S.C.
Hofstra
James Madison
3
2
24
26
25
20
25
11
21
25
15
10

HuskerGeek CAA All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 29.1860
2 28.5603
3 26.8236
4 24.1589
5 21.7624
6 21.4825
7 21.3049
8 20.7932
9 20.6371
10 20.4074

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 18.7967
2 18.7120
3 18.2634
4 17.1240
5 16.6325
6 16.3322
7 14.5994
8 13.6683
9 12.4130
10 11.3499

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 19.0292
2 18.1640
3 17.8565
4 17.7281
5 17.7100
6 15.1703
7 13.8161
8 13.5752
9 12.5836
10 12.0430

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2280
2 0.2267
3 0.2176
4 0.2106
5 0.2079
6 0.1925
7 0.1920
8 0.1855
9 0.1844
10 0.1804

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1543
2 0.1485
3 0.1457
4 0.1427
5 0.1377
6 0.1310
7 0.1267
8 0.1254
9 0.1247
10 0.1054

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1809
2 0.1778
3 0.1594
4 0.1552
5 0.1382
6 0.1312
7 0.1297
8 0.1276
9 0.1269
10 0.1223


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek