Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

CAA - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 1
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Towson 1,662.6427 1,632.1094 1,647.3053 51.40 63.50 0.112
2nd James Madison 1,618.3359 1,583.3978 1,600.7715 47.17 55.25 0.076
3rd Hofstra 1,566.0991 1,535.8928 1,550.9224 44.31 51.72 0.004
4th Northeastern 1,552.6877 1,515.8471 1,534.1568 43.03 56.29 -0.015
5th Delaware 1,534.2373 1,505.2674 1,519.6833 43.99 52.87 -0.018
6th UNCW 1,517.7998 1,486.4491 1,502.0426 43.84 51.19 -0.054
7th Col. of Charleston 1,517.9293 1,483.7839 1,500.7595 41.93 52.41 -0.047
8th Elon 1,512.9001 1,476.3156 1,494.4959 42.13 51.92 -0.057
9th William & Mary 1,445.5656 1,413.9462 1,429.6685 37.78 21.87 -0.102

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Towson 0.2684 40.44 13.60 37.57 44.01 6.03 5.77
2nd James Madison 0.2480 38.46 13.66 34.49 45.95 4.62 5.54
3rd Hofstra 0.2227 38.03 15.76 35.00 44.83 6.77 7.19
4th Northeastern 0.2167 37.79 16.12 35.36 46.34 6.62 6.82
5th Delaware 0.2150 37.63 16.12 35.14 46.16 6.17 7.08
6th Elon 0.1783 34.22 16.39 32.03 50.34 6.82 5.47
7th UNCW 0.1706 32.39 15.33 29.77 54.18 5.93 7.11
8th William & Mary 0.1653 33.79 17.26 30.93 51.70 8.63 10.36
9th Col. of Charleston 0.1617 32.23 16.05 30.51 53.23 5.50 4.86

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Towson 0.1561 31.63 16.02 29.85 53.76 6.99 5.97
2nd James Madison 0.1716 33.50 16.34 30.27 48.87 7.95 5.55
3rd Col. of Charleston 0.2083 35.44 14.60 33.34 51.24 5.61 6.20
4th Hofstra 0.2184 36.06 14.22 32.83 49.34 4.22 5.32
5th UNCW 0.2249 36.66 14.17 34.20 47.18 5.66 6.42
6th Northeastern 0.2320 37.01 13.81 34.09 49.55 4.97 6.96
7th Delaware 0.2326 37.13 13.86 34.19 47.75 5.95 7.72
8th Elon 0.2350 37.77 14.27 35.39 46.93 5.85 6.92
9th William & Mary 0.2669 41.21 14.52 38.39 44.44 6.09 6.61

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,531.0896 1,528.9760 1,521.5129 1,518.6276 1,525.0515
Difference -2.1135 -9.5766 -12.4620 -8.0507

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Towson 105 2,324 1,287 145 165 55.38 16.0 14.1 1,699 607 118 177 64.27 14.4 9.6
Delaware 106 2,327 1,194 173 222 51.31 13.5 10.5 2,102 966 154 180 54.04 13.6 11.7
James Madison 86 1,972 972 105 200 49.29 18.8 9.9 1,844 832 102 182 54.88 18.1 10.1
Northeastern 108 2,459 1,160 170 228 47.17 14.5 10.8 2,289 991 152 224 56.71 15.1 10.2
Hofstra 111 2,460 1,198 170 238 48.70 14.5 10.3 2,388 1,135 130 196 52.47 18.4 12.2
Elon 128 2,808 1,344 160 226 47.86 17.6 12.4 2,767 1,294 181 228 53.24 15.3 12.1
UNCW 117 2,333 1,114 185 241 47.75 12.6 9.7 2,362 1,123 151 259 52.46 15.6 9.1
Col. of Charleston 102 2,191 992 102 147 45.28 21.5 14.9 2,299 1,099 139 192 52.20 16.5 12.0
William & Mary 100 952 378 118 176 39.71 8.1 5.4 2,449 2,050 181 192 16.29 13.5 12.8
Conference Average 107 2,203 1,071 148 205 48.05 15.2 10.9 2,244 1,122 145 203 50.73 15.6 11.1
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the CAA

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

75.34

2019-11-22
Hofstra
Delaware
2
3
25
23
25
20
26
28
22
25
13
15
GAME

74.46

2019-11-22 Hempstead, NY
Northeastern
Elon
2
3
24
26
25
23
18
25
25
12
14
16
GAME

73.94

2019-11-01 Towson, Md.
Towson
James Madison
3
1
25
18
21
25
26
24
25
16
GAME

73.35

2019-11-10
UNCW
Towson
1
3
25
23
14
25
25
27
16
25
GAME

73.29

2019-11-08 Charleston, S.C.
Col. of Charleston
Towson
1
3
16
25
27
25
12
25
25
27
GAME

73.00

2019-10-18
James Madison
Northeastern
3
0
25
23
28
26
26
24
GAME

72.50

2019-10-12 Elon, N.C.
Elon
Delaware
3
2
21
25
25
21
24
26
25
19
15
13
GAME

72.44

2019-10-27 Charleston, S.C.
Col. of Charleston
Delaware
1
3
23
25
25
14
18
25
26
28
GAME

71.90

2019-10-25 Charleston, S.C.
Col. of Charleston
James Madison
1
3
16
25
25
22
22
25
29
31
GAME

71.49

2019-10-13
Hofstra
UNCW
3
2
16
25
25
13
17
25
26
24
19
17

HuskerGeek CAA All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 23.5208
2 22.3000
3 20.3932
4 19.2991
5 19.0390
6 17.5928
7 17.0363
8 16.9212
9 16.5674
10 16.4660

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 15.6278
2 14.3610
3 13.8059
4 12.7306
5 11.0433
6 11.0344
7 11.0244
8 10.8937
9 10.5498
10 9.9429

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 16.1171
2 15.6607
3 15.3118
4 14.2414
5 12.3098
6 10.9410
7 10.7252
8 10.7219
9 10.6978
10 9.4975

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2506
2 0.2119
3 0.1963
4 0.1917
5 0.1763
6 0.1754
7 0.1727
8 0.1714
9 0.1676
10 0.1663

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1551
2 0.1408
3 0.1362
4 0.1312
5 0.1207
6 0.1130
7 0.1099
8 0.1052
9 0.1052
10 0.1002

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1628
2 0.1579
3 0.1424
4 0.1331
5 0.1272
6 0.1202
7 0.1172
8 0.1117
9 0.1083
10 0.0954


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek