Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

CAA - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 1
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Towson 1,512.5560 1,521.6160 1,517.0793 51.43 54.27 0.108
2nd Northeastern 1,436.3710 1,443.0164 1,439.6899 51.40 49.74 0.012
3rd Delaware 1,430.7904 1,441.9863 1,436.3774 48.76 49.45 -0.024
4th Hofstra 1,429.4912 1,431.9386 1,430.7144 48.52 50.10 -0.001
5th Col. of Charleston 1,427.0872 1,431.9282 1,429.5057 49.98 49.98 -0.020
6th Elon 1,415.4370 1,420.2120 1,417.8225 48.41 49.25 -0.026
7th William & Mary 1,399.2391 1,405.5897 1,402.4108 45.89 50.46 -0.040
8th Stony Brook 1,375.2333 1,382.3466 1,378.7854 46.44 48.09 -0.051
9th UNCW 1,362.5877 1,369.2775 1,365.9285 49.52 44.57 -0.072
10th N.C. A&T 1,340.6240 1,347.7809 1,344.1977 45.95 46.28 -0.084
11th Hampton 1,287.2444 1,295.4882 1,291.3597 42.37 44.87 -0.169

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Towson 0.2666 41.68 15.02 39.20 43.60 4.86 7.20
2nd Col. of Charleston 0.2141 35.30 13.89 32.31 49.84 6.10 5.91
3rd Northeastern 0.2140 37.40 15.99 35.25 47.76 6.83 8.12
4th Hofstra 0.2049 36.75 16.26 34.57 47.71 6.56 7.00
5th Stony Brook 0.2043 34.59 14.16 31.82 51.10 6.04 7.82
6th William & Mary 0.1962 35.86 16.23 33.37 48.38 7.10 5.44
7th Delaware 0.1842 35.37 16.96 33.03 49.44 5.38 6.92
8th Elon 0.1817 33.19 15.02 30.87 51.02 5.82 6.97
9th N.C. A&T 0.1550 33.08 17.58 31.08 53.06 6.76 6.39
10th UNCW 0.1480 31.74 16.94 29.46 54.40 6.22 6.50
11th Hampton 0.1138 29.95 18.56 26.74 52.06 6.85 5.42

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Towson 0.1588 33.90 18.01 31.52 47.78 8.51 5.40
2nd Northeastern 0.2021 37.07 16.86 34.57 47.17 6.06 7.23
3rd Hofstra 0.2062 36.74 16.12 33.54 48.16 6.08 6.75
4th Elon 0.2076 35.64 14.87 32.71 48.66 5.64 6.21
5th Delaware 0.2078 35.40 14.63 32.57 50.87 4.78 5.18
6th UNCW 0.2200 37.59 15.58 34.60 46.58 5.47 7.68
7th Col. of Charleston 0.2345 38.26 14.81 34.71 47.80 6.46 7.38
8th William & Mary 0.2366 38.13 14.47 34.74 47.92 5.98 6.30
9th N.C. A&T 0.2386 38.95 15.09 35.70 46.35 5.92 8.01
10th Stony Brook 0.2558 38.57 12.99 35.12 47.25 4.96 8.11
11th Hampton 0.2832 42.67 14.36 38.78 39.34 4.58 8.22

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,404.8974 1,405.0480 1,408.7921 1,411.8477 1,407.6463
Difference 0.1506 3.8947 6.9504 3.6652

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Towson 109 2,601 1,380 192 264 53.06 13.5 9.9 2,173 980 116 204 54.90 18.7 10.7
Northeastern 105 2,352 1,240 188 213 52.72 12.5 11.0 2,264 1,145 173 214 49.43 13.1 10.6
Col. of Charleston 109 2,430 1,251 147 156 51.48 16.5 15.6 2,419 1,206 184 220 50.15 13.1 11.0
Hofstra 108 2,388 1,215 172 239 50.88 13.9 10.0 2,341 1,164 159 196 50.28 14.7 11.9
Delaware 109 2,400 1,213 173 183 50.54 13.9 13.1 2,335 1,171 118 206 49.85 19.8 11.3
William & Mary 102 2,099 1,030 134 168 49.07 15.7 12.5 2,109 1,034 147 190 50.97 14.3 11.1
Elon 109 2,346 1,180 174 206 50.30 13.5 11.4 2,370 1,205 148 186 49.16 16.0 12.7
Stony Brook 100 2,146 1,034 172 227 48.18 12.5 9.5 2,251 1,159 181 168 48.51 12.4 13.4
N.C. A&T 103 1,807 887 153 216 49.09 11.8 8.4 1,963 1,041 187 220 46.97 10.5 8.9
UNCW 99 2,019 1,024 132 194 50.72 15.3 10.4 2,216 1,223 169 188 44.81 13.1 11.8
Hampton 68 1,358 631 85 104 46.47 16.0 13.1 1,547 830 126 152 46.35 12.3 10.2
Conference Average 102 2,177 1,099 157 197 50.23 14.1 11.3 2,181 1,105 155 195 49.22 14.4 11.2
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the CAA

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

74.52

2022-10-02
Col. of Charleston
Delaware
2
3
25
23
27
25
27
29
21
25
11
15
GAME

74.02

2022-11-05
William & Mary
Delaware
2
3
33
35
26
24
23
25
25
23
13
15
GAME

72.49

2022-11-17 Towson, MD
Hofstra
William & Mary
2
3
25
19
25
20
14
25
18
25
12
15
GAME

70.80

2022-10-16
Delaware
Stony Brook
2
3
23
25
25
21
25
22
25
27
9
15
GAME

70.36

2022-10-23
Elon
Col. of Charleston
3
2
31
29
24
26
25
20
21
25
15
10
GAME

69.40

2022-09-18
Delaware
Northeastern
3
2
25
23
21
25
30
28
16
25
15
13
GAME

68.91

2022-10-30
Stony Brook
Col. of Charleston
1
3
25
21
23
25
21
25
24
26
GAME

68.85

2022-11-06
Hofstra
Northeastern
3
1
22
25
25
22
25
17
34
32
GAME

68.62

2022-11-06
William & Mary
Delaware
2
3
21
25
25
21
25
27
25
20
7
15
GAME

68.28

2022-11-12
Col. of Charleston
N.C. A&T
3
2
22
25
25
19
25
22
21
25
16
14

HuskerGeek CAA All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 27.3007
2 20.6246
3 18.5928
4 18.5077
5 18.4105
6 18.3002
7 18.0317
8 17.5659
9 16.3785
10 16.2047

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 16.4404
2 13.1486
3 13.1061
4 11.9896
5 11.6769
6 11.2404
7 10.4166
8 9.7522
9 9.5963
10 9.1841

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 14.7691
2 14.6385
3 14.6162
4 14.1995
5 13.5330
6 13.3209
7 12.9598
8 12.2525
9 12.1139
10 10.9235

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2505
2 0.2043
3 0.1897
4 0.1892
5 0.1851
6 0.1841
7 0.1830
8 0.1689
9 0.1654
10 0.1600

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1508
2 0.1394
3 0.1342
4 0.1202
5 0.1074
6 0.1071
7 0.1041
8 0.1021
9 0.1019
10 0.0975

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1507
2 0.1440
3 0.1407
4 0.1388
5 0.1355
6 0.1303
7 0.1241
8 0.1224
9 0.1189
10 0.1145


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek