Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,718.6737
Football michigan 11.0495
Men's Basketball arizona 10.1261
Women's Basketball south carolina 11.9381
Ice Hockey quinnipiac 9.0719
Men's Soccer stanford 8.6575
Women's Soccer florida st 11.3869
Women's Volleyball wisconsin 11.6155
Field Hockey northwestern 9.8733

CCAA - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 2
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st CSUSB 1,665.3733 1,663.8500 1,664.6115 59.59 59.92 0.252
2nd Cal State LA 1,656.7175 1,653.5345 1,655.1253 58.76 58.02 0.228
3rd Cal Poly Pomona 1,645.0455 1,645.7772 1,645.4113 59.24 59.25 0.215
4th San Fran. St. 1,593.3729 1,591.5798 1,592.4761 54.95 57.23 0.148
5th Cal St. East Bay 1,570.9912 1,569.2039 1,570.0973 58.84 53.97 0.141
6th Sonoma St. 1,566.2375 1,563.5352 1,564.8858 54.56 53.48 0.134
7th Cal St. San Marcos 1,528.6144 1,524.4322 1,526.5219 54.10 51.11 0.072
8th Stanislaus St. 1,523.1556 1,525.0588 1,524.1069 53.20 52.28 0.060
9th Cal St. Monterey Bay 1,519.5842 1,517.4236 1,518.5035 53.70 52.19 0.080
10th Cal Poly Humboldt 1,494.1655 1,493.7239 1,493.9447 51.82 49.50 0.034
11th Cal St. Dom. Hills 1,489.0323 1,490.9255 1,489.9786 55.00 51.03 0.067
12th Chico St. 1,459.6944 1,456.5110 1,458.1018 52.09 48.81 0.011

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st CSUSB 0.3402 44.83 10.81 40.25 42.15 3.63 8.74
2nd Cal Poly Pomona 0.3200 42.02 10.02 38.07 42.88 4.12 8.77
3rd Cal State LA 0.3149 44.60 13.11 40.54 40.17 4.36 10.23
4th San Fran. St. 0.3019 42.76 12.58 39.24 42.01 5.18 9.39
5th Sonoma St. 0.2641 41.03 14.61 37.57 40.14 5.67 9.20
6th Cal St. East Bay 0.2617 36.83 10.66 33.53 50.17 3.25 8.26
7th Cal St. San Marcos 0.2437 38.09 13.72 35.48 49.11 4.17 8.96
8th Cal St. Monterey Bay 0.2272 36.52 13.80 33.18 47.59 4.97 8.74
9th Stanislaus St. 0.2045 33.95 13.50 30.42 51.98 4.49 9.16
10th Chico St. 0.2034 33.87 13.52 30.32 51.08 4.61 7.82
11th Cal St. Dom. Hills 0.2020 34.27 14.07 31.44 51.27 5.13 7.93
12th Cal Poly Humboldt 0.1948 35.81 16.33 32.51 49.88 5.14 9.40

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Cal State LA 0.0865 27.55 18.90 25.90 55.17 7.51 5.57
2nd CSUSB 0.0879 26.95 18.16 25.23 56.60 7.20 7.26
3rd Cal Poly Pomona 0.1050 27.40 16.90 24.98 55.38 6.28 5.12
4th Cal St. East Bay 0.1205 28.42 16.37 26.59 55.69 5.09 6.02
5th Sonoma St. 0.1300 28.91 15.92 26.35 55.36 7.06 6.83
6th Cal St. Dom. Hills 0.1352 30.84 17.32 29.20 54.30 6.66 6.38
7th Stanislaus St. 0.1447 30.18 15.71 27.59 56.42 5.85 6.08
8th Cal St. Monterey Bay 0.1475 30.94 16.18 29.36 53.89 5.68 7.07
9th San Fran. St. 0.1535 30.59 15.24 28.90 55.81 4.95 6.56
10th Cal Poly Humboldt 0.1606 31.84 15.78 29.54 54.60 5.85 5.65
11th Cal St. San Marcos 0.1719 33.23 16.04 31.39 52.76 5.97 6.95
12th Chico St. 0.1929 32.60 13.31 30.20 52.54 3.73 8.35

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,558.6470 1,558.1051 1,554.4934 1,549.4319 1,555.1694
Difference -0.5419 -4.1536 -9.2151 -4.6369

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Cal Poly Pomona 106 2,485 1,346 192 236 54.17 12.9 10.5 2,149 975 136 179 54.63 15.8 12.0
CSUSB 115 2,645 1,424 194 221 53.84 13.6 12.0 2,273 1,029 196 251 54.73 11.6 9.1
Cal State LA 123 2,787 1,443 245 363 51.78 11.4 7.7 2,562 1,222 173 256 52.30 14.8 10.0
San Fran. St. 105 2,329 1,166 188 287 50.06 12.4 8.1 2,217 1,045 170 221 52.86 13.0 10.0
Cal St. East Bay 99 2,144 1,141 151 179 53.22 14.2 12.0 2,168 1,092 160 166 49.63 13.6 13.1
Sonoma St. 102 2,218 1,107 186 270 49.91 11.9 8.2 2,190 1,111 174 198 49.27 12.6 11.1
Cal St. Monterey Bay 96 2,017 1,006 161 179 49.88 12.5 11.3 2,092 1,082 174 185 48.28 12.0 11.3
Stanislaus St. 96 2,095 1,036 170 162 49.45 12.3 12.9 2,152 1,113 159 242 48.28 13.5 8.9
Cal St. Dom. Hills 91 1,901 955 136 186 50.24 14.0 10.2 2,064 1,093 158 180 47.05 13.1 11.5
Cal St. San Marcos 107 2,243 1,104 175 169 49.22 12.8 13.3 2,376 1,268 193 244 46.63 12.3 9.7
Chico St. 84 1,675 811 112 143 48.42 15.0 11.7 1,929 1,056 186 196 45.26 10.4 9.8
Cal Poly Humboldt 100 2,097 995 176 200 47.45 11.9 10.5 2,259 1,228 152 220 45.64 14.9 10.3
Conference Average 102 2,220 1,128 174 216 50.64 12.9 10.7 2,203 1,110 169 212 49.55 13.1 10.6
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the CCAA

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

78.45

 2023-09-16
Cal St. East Bay
Cal Poly Pomona
1
3
24
26
29
27
19
25
19
25
GAME

77.15

 2023-11-17 Los Angeles, CA
CSUSB
Cal Poly Pomona
3
1
25
19
19
25
25
19
25
20
GAME

76.57

 2023-11-04
Cal State LA
Cal Poly Pomona
3
1
27
25
23
25
25
21
27
25
GAME

76.39

 2023-10-14
Cal St. Monterey Bay
Cal St. East Bay
2
3
23
25
25
23
25
20
21
25
13
15
GAME

75.84

 2023-11-03
Cal State LA
Cal St. San Marcos
3
1
26
24
24
26
28
26
25
19
GAME

75.69

 2023-09-29
Cal State LA
CSUSB
3
1
25
21
22
25
25
18
26
24
GAME

75.33

 2023-12-01
CSUSB
Cal Poly Pomona
3
1
26
24
25
22
18
25
25
19
GAME

75.15

 2023-09-23
Chico St.
Cal Poly Humboldt
3
2
29
27
25
22
24
26
22
25
15
12
GAME

75.02

 2023-10-12
CSUSB
San Fran. St.
3
1
25
20
23
25
25
16
25
20
GAME

74.92

 2023-10-07
CSUSB
Cal Poly Pomona
3
2
25
20
16
25
25
21
15
25
15
8

HuskerGeek CCAA All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
Mia Cal St. East Bay A
Sammy Campion Cal Poly Pomona A
Emily Elliott Cal State LA A
Iane Henke Cal State LA A
Jenna Patton CSUSB A
Jenn Trenhan Sonoma St. D
Taumafa Tuinauvai Cal St. East Bay D
Caitie Mueller Cal Poly Pomona S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
Daisy Duke Cal Poly Pomona A
Leilani Hallman Sonoma St. A
Taryn King CSUSB A
Ashley Robinson CSUSB A
Trinity Sheridan CSUSB A
Shira Lahav CSUSB D
Ashley Vanderpan Cal St. Monterey Bay D
Marlee Nunley CSUSB S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1 Iane Henke Cal State LA
2 Jenn Trenhan Sonoma St.
3 Sammy Campion Cal Poly Pomona
4 Emily Elliott Cal State LA
5 Caitie Mueller Cal Poly Pomona

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1 Iane Henke Cal State LA
2 Sammy Campion Cal Poly Pomona
3 Emily Elliott Cal State LA
4 Daisy Duke Cal Poly Pomona
5 Trinity Sheridan CSUSB

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1 Caitie Mueller Cal Poly Pomona
2 Marlee Nunley CSUSB
3 Kimberly DeBoer San Fran. St.
4 Tori Goff Cal St. San Marcos
5 Eliza Cannon Cal State LA

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1 Taumafa Tuinauvai Cal St. East Bay
2 Shira Lahav CSUSB
3 Gabby Rawson Stanislaus St.
4 Avery Percival Cal Poly Pomona
5 Mia Christensen Cal St. San Marcos

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 Iane Henke Cal State LA 26.5207
2 Jenn Trenhan Sonoma St. 25.8635
3 Sammy Campion Cal Poly Pomona 24.0288
4 Emily Elliott Cal State LA 23.7374
5 Caitie Mueller Cal Poly Pomona 22.6888
6 Marlee Nunley CSUSB 21.2637
7 Awelina Fakalata Cal Poly Humboldt 20.2796
8 Kimberly DeBoer San Fran. St. 19.7748
9 Ashley Vanderpan Cal St. Monterey Bay 19.7178
10 Tori Goff Cal St. San Marcos 19.5331

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 Emily Elliott Cal State LA 15.9999
2 Jenn Trenhan Sonoma St. 14.5767
3 Iane Henke Cal State LA 14.4468
4 Caitie Mueller Cal Poly Pomona 14.1605
5 Sammy Campion Cal Poly Pomona 13.2312
6 Kimberly DeBoer San Fran. St. 12.8602
7 Marlee Nunley CSUSB 12.8500
8 Tori Goff Cal St. San Marcos 11.8982
9 Trinity Sheridan CSUSB 11.8316
10 Daisy Duke Cal Poly Pomona 10.4466

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 Gabby Rawson Stanislaus St. 17.1436
2 Avery Percival Cal Poly Pomona 13.6311
3 Mina Barajas Cal Poly Humboldt 13.1543
4 Angelina Robles Cal St. Dom. Hills 13.0796
5 Iane Henke Cal State LA 12.0739
6 Mia Christensen Cal St. San Marcos 12.0416
7 Shira Lahav CSUSB 11.8872
8 Awelina Fakalata Cal Poly Humboldt 11.6634
9 Jenn Trenhan Sonoma St. 11.2867
10 Riley Beyma Sonoma St. 10.9819

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 Jenn Trenhan Sonoma St. 0.2536
2 Ashley Vanderpan Cal St. Monterey Bay 0.2293
3 Sammy Campion Cal Poly Pomona 0.2267
4 Iane Henke Cal State LA 0.2248
5 Caitie Mueller Cal Poly Pomona 0.2140
6 Awelina Fakalata Cal Poly Humboldt 0.2028
7 Kimberly DeBoer San Fran. St. 0.1997
8 Emily Elliott Cal State LA 0.1995
9 Daisy Duke Cal Poly Pomona 0.1939
10 Tori Goff Cal St. San Marcos 0.1934

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 Jenn Trenhan Sonoma St. 0.1429
2 Emily Elliott Cal State LA 0.1345
3 Caitie Mueller Cal Poly Pomona 0.1336
4 Kimberly DeBoer San Fran. St. 0.1299
5 Daisy Duke Cal Poly Pomona 0.1290
6 Sammy Campion Cal Poly Pomona 0.1248
7 Iane Henke Cal State LA 0.1224
8 Ashley Vanderpan Cal St. Monterey Bay 0.1203
9 Tori Goff Cal St. San Marcos 0.1178
10 Marlee Nunley CSUSB 0.1168

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 Gabby Rawson Stanislaus St. 0.1805
2 Angelina Robles Cal St. Dom. Hills 0.1486
3 Mina Barajas Cal Poly Humboldt 0.1315
4 Avery Percival Cal Poly Pomona 0.1286
5 Mia Christensen Cal St. San Marcos 0.1241
6 Awelina Fakalata Cal Poly Humboldt 0.1166
7 Lexi Carpenter Chico St. 0.1132
8 Jenn Trenhan Sonoma St. 0.1107
9 Lexi Pagani Cal St. East Bay 0.1103
10 Ashley Vanderpan Cal St. Monterey Bay 0.1089

Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
Rankings
Media
Nebraska
HuskerGeek 2023
HuskerGeek