Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

CCC - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Endicott 1,479.5082 1,441.8547 1,460.5601 53.88 65.31 0.161
2nd Wentworth 1,377.4005 1,343.7439 1,360.4681 50.99 59.50 0.092
3rd Roger Williams 1,369.6742 1,332.1536 1,350.7836 49.82 55.42 0.081
4th Gordon 1,288.7090 1,249.9249 1,269.1688 50.37 49.96 -0.040
5th Salve Regina 1,273.6142 1,237.7161 1,255.5368 48.24 50.95 -0.010
6th U New England 1,261.9429 1,235.0208 1,248.4093 49.19 49.49 -0.035
7th Western New Eng. 1,240.6821 1,205.7611 1,223.0970 46.72 50.28 -0.045
8th Curry 1,150.0062 1,111.4756 1,130.5768 40.44 46.58 -0.156
9th Nichols 1,132.6667 1,095.3643 1,113.8593 45.53 39.76 -0.190

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Endicott 0.2567 37.56 11.89 35.61 48.95 4.19 9.18
2nd Roger Williams 0.2316 37.33 14.17 34.87 49.34 4.42 8.87
3rd Wentworth 0.2100 34.09 13.09 31.93 52.75 4.31 10.34
4th Salve Regina 0.1553 30.06 14.53 27.55 57.28 3.90 6.58
5th Gordon 0.1466 31.87 17.21 30.13 55.13 4.46 11.31
6th U New England 0.1387 29.47 15.60 27.98 55.95 5.69 6.82
7th Western New Eng. 0.1305 29.70 16.64 27.01 57.45 3.95 9.32
8th Curry 0.0817 24.26 16.10 22.77 61.50 4.96 6.18
9th Nichols 0.0347 23.03 19.56 21.19 62.26 5.07 9.68

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Endicott 0.0957 26.65 17.08 24.76 58.64 4.48 6.55
2nd Wentworth 0.1177 27.42 15.66 25.24 60.68 4.16 7.78
3rd Roger Williams 0.1506 31.74 16.68 29.82 53.09 5.89 9.04
4th Salve Regina 0.1655 30.64 14.10 27.36 55.92 2.80 9.59
5th U New England 0.1732 32.87 15.55 30.86 54.80 2.65 10.54
6th Western New Eng. 0.1756 33.47 15.90 30.29 52.09 3.51 9.99
7th Gordon 0.1868 33.30 14.62 29.98 52.91 3.88 11.04
8th Nichols 0.2248 37.72 15.23 34.12 48.57 2.65 10.36
9th Curry 0.2378 38.38 14.60 35.37 48.52 2.25 10.93

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,268.0511 1,262.5772 1,269.3991 1,257.7050 1,264.4331
Difference -5.4739 1.3480 -10.3461 -4.8240

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Wentworth 109 2,340 1,209 266 292 51.67 8.8 8.0 1,935 792 153 211 59.07 12.6 9.2
Endicott 109 2,362 1,190 211 177 50.38 11.2 13.3 2,003 806 146 239 59.76 13.7 8.4
U New England 79 1,726 927 133 176 53.71 13.0 9.8 1,615 789 158 185 51.15 10.2 8.7
Salve Regina 108 2,172 1,134 168 185 52.21 12.9 11.7 2,081 1,040 211 216 50.02 9.9 9.6
Gordon 99 2,049 1,057 246 190 51.59 8.3 10.8 1,982 995 225 207 49.80 8.8 9.6
Curry 91 1,562 769 190 162 49.23 8.2 9.6 1,552 758 191 182 51.16 8.1 8.5
Nichols 72 1,509 829 210 227 54.94 7.2 6.6 1,525 843 136 178 44.72 11.2 8.6
Western New Eng. 121 2,150 1,048 268 315 48.74 8.0 6.8 2,198 1,100 246 261 49.96 8.9 8.4
Roger Williams 111 2,081 985 199 278 47.33 10.5 7.5 2,160 1,066 219 243 50.65 9.9 8.9
Conference Average 100 1,995 1,016 210 222 51.09 9.8 9.4 1,895 910 187 214 51.81 10.4 8.9
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the CCC

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

63.74

2019-11-02 Boston, Mass.
Wentworth
Gordon
3
2
17
25
25
21
18
25
30
28
15
12
GAME

63.46

2019-09-18 Boston, Mass.
Wentworth
Roger Williams
2
3
21
25
22
25
25
9
25
23
10
15
GAME

62.78

2019-10-24 Beverly, Mass.
Endicott
Wentworth
3
0
25
19
25
21
25
15
GAME

62.04

2019-09-24 Springfield, Mass.
Western New Eng.
U New England
2
3
23
25
25
23
23
25
26
24
10
15
GAME

61.52

2019-09-28 Beverly, Mass.
Endicott
Roger Williams
3
1
25
18
25
11
23
25
25
12
GAME

60.83

2019-10-02 Bristol, R.I.
Roger Williams
Gordon
1
3
26
24
26
28
21
25
16
25
GAME

60.78

2019-10-08 Beverly, Mass.
Endicott
Salve Regina
3
0
25
12
25
21
25
22
GAME

60.09

2019-11-09 Beverly, Mass.
Endicott
Roger Williams
3
0
25
21
25
18
25
12
GAME

59.99

2019-10-16 Wenham, Mass.
Gordon
Endicott
0
3
23
25
12
25
22
25
GAME

59.89

2019-10-22 Wenham, Mass.
Gordon
Western New Eng.
3
2
21
25
19
25
25
22
25
19
22
20

HuskerGeek CCC All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 22.4461
2 22.0032
3 16.7328
4 15.5996
5 14.7831
6 14.4796
7 14.4423
8 14.2137
9 14.1664
10 13.8242

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 14.1027
2 10.7330
3 10.3986
4 10.0652
5 9.2408
6 8.7080
7 8.2680
8 7.8710
9 7.7350
10 7.7302

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 15.8797
2 13.4594
3 13.4282
4 12.0179
5 11.9379
6 10.4028
7 9.1643
8 8.9377
9 8.4594
10 8.3434

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2316
2 0.2245
3 0.2099
4 0.1795
5 0.1673
6 0.1643
7 0.1591
8 0.1576
9 0.1570
10 0.1562

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1410
2 0.1167
3 0.1059
4 0.1050
5 0.1042
6 0.0982
7 0.0968
8 0.0963
9 0.0899
10 0.0847

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1588
2 0.1495
3 0.1399
4 0.1306
5 0.1257
6 0.1146
7 0.1095
8 0.1057
9 0.1048
10 0.1007


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek