Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

CCC - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Endicott 1,415.2206 1,417.9514 1,416.5853 54.33 55.98 0.114
2nd Salve Regina 1,334.2471 1,338.5082 1,336.3760 50.47 52.11 0.031
3rd Wentworth 1,307.3031 1,306.8033 1,307.0532 53.64 46.36 -0.011
4th Gordon 1,303.0756 1,297.5180 1,300.2938 48.70 50.44 0.046
5th Suffolk 1,300.0877 1,298.2036 1,299.1453 51.54 48.91 0.000
6th Western New Eng. 1,292.1405 1,294.1392 1,293.1395 54.23 45.17 -0.024
7th Nichols 1,222.2125 1,221.6458 1,221.9291 49.46 44.42 -0.103
8th U New England 1,207.7095 1,211.0604 1,209.3838 49.23 40.50 -0.095
9th Roger Williams 1,189.0627 1,193.1540 1,191.1066 49.64 39.12 -0.129
10th Curry 1,018.2939 1,023.8817 1,021.0840 48.07 29.47 -0.296

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Endicott 0.2581 39.09 13.28 36.26 45.85 4.67 9.75
2nd Gordon 0.2335 40.28 16.93 37.34 46.09 5.15 9.01
3rd Salve Regina 0.1665 32.21 15.56 29.32 50.35 3.65 8.88
4th Wentworth 0.1389 32.11 18.22 30.50 50.52 4.81 10.81
5th Suffolk 0.1367 31.90 18.23 30.43 49.08 5.01 14.30
6th Western New Eng. 0.1308 29.15 16.07 25.97 55.89 3.87 10.26
7th Nichols 0.1120 29.85 18.66 28.76 54.37 6.24 10.42
8th Roger Williams 0.1058 28.21 17.62 25.96 55.71 4.81 9.47
9th U New England 0.0848 26.05 17.58 23.94 61.15 4.41 8.96
10th Curry -0.0265 17.15 19.80 15.44 69.53 4.02 5.80

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Salve Regina 0.1351 29.60 16.09 26.63 56.41 4.24 5.73
2nd Suffolk 0.1370 30.16 16.45 27.64 56.08 3.48 9.43
3rd Endicott 0.1443 31.69 17.27 28.94 52.10 5.39 8.49
4th Wentworth 0.1503 32.52 17.49 30.08 54.15 3.42 10.44
5th Western New Eng. 0.1545 30.36 14.91 28.28 56.50 3.23 7.49
6th U New England 0.1803 33.35 15.32 30.69 53.89 3.03 12.56
7th Gordon 0.1875 36.58 17.83 32.88 47.24 5.50 11.70
8th Nichols 0.2147 36.31 14.84 33.24 48.63 3.80 10.10
9th Roger Williams 0.2346 37.20 13.74 33.01 48.08 3.78 10.19
10th Curry 0.2690 38.65 11.75 34.86 47.47 1.73 13.99

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,259.6097 1,269.8034 1,271.8241 1,278.6269 1,269.9660
Difference 10.1938 12.2145 19.0173 13.8085

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Suffolk 98 2,098 1,150 343 270 54.81 6.1 7.8 1,830 878 171 192 52.02 10.7 9.5
Endicott 103 2,341 1,209 214 169 51.65 10.9 13.9 2,132 974 204 238 54.32 10.5 9.0
Nichols 83 1,727 975 277 202 56.46 6.2 8.5 1,547 792 159 206 48.80 9.7 7.5
Wentworth 95 2,094 1,164 240 240 55.59 8.7 8.7 1,976 1,031 220 235 47.82 9.0 8.4
Western New Eng. 108 1,987 1,120 262 283 56.37 7.6 7.0 1,881 1,011 190 224 46.25 9.9 8.4
Salve Regina 89 2,000 1,009 185 238 50.45 10.8 8.4 1,914 926 134 188 51.62 14.3 10.2
Gordon 111 2,188 1,097 251 280 50.14 8.7 7.8 2,094 1,007 289 247 51.91 7.2 8.5
U New England 93 1,818 981 219 193 53.96 8.3 9.4 1,884 1,055 244 223 44.00 7.7 8.4
Roger Williams 87 1,675 855 164 139 51.05 10.2 12.1 2,005 1,208 215 223 39.75 9.3 9.0
Curry 82 1,260 690 155 249 54.76 8.1 5.1 1,665 1,073 238 244 35.56 7.0 6.8
Conference Average 95 1,919 1,025 231 226 53.52 8.6 8.9 1,893 996 206 222 47.21 9.5 8.6
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the CCC

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

65.59

2022-09-24 Newport, R.I.
Salve Regina
Nichols
3
1
23
25
25
23
25
23
27
25
GAME

63.30

2022-11-01 Boston, Mass.
Wentworth
Western New Eng.
2
3
16
25
20
25
25
22
25
22
13
15
GAME

62.43

2022-09-24 Boston, Mass.
Suffolk
Endicott
1
3
26
24
19
25
20
25
22
25
GAME

61.74

2022-10-11
U New England
Endicott
1
3
25
22
20
25
24
26
22
25
GAME

61.19

2022-11-01 Beverly, Mass.
Endicott
Nichols
3
0
25
17
25
22
25
22
GAME

60.93

2022-09-20 Wenham, Mass.
Gordon
Suffolk
3
1
19
25
25
23
27
25
29
27
GAME

60.82

2022-10-12 Boston, Mass.
Suffolk
Salve Regina
3
1
25
23
25
20
21
25
25
22
GAME

60.80

2022-09-24
Western New Eng.
Wentworth
2
3
25
16
24
26
25
16
18
25
15
17
GAME

60.75

2022-11-05 Wenham, Mass.
Gordon
Endicott
0
3
20
25
18
25
22
25
GAME

60.52

2022-10-26 Newport, R.I.
Salve Regina
Western New Eng.
3
0
25
22
27
25
25
18

HuskerGeek CCC All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 19.7185
2 16.9045
3 15.8709
4 15.3573
5 13.4060
6 13.0523
7 12.9604
8 12.9271
9 12.7163
10 11.7068

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 10.9295
2 10.5706
3 10.2466
4 8.5846
5 7.9576
6 7.7444
7 7.5610
8 7.3911
9 7.2132
10 6.8538

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 12.0181
2 11.3577
3 11.0552
4 10.4639
5 10.2904
6 9.6230
7 8.8430
8 8.7890
9 7.9133
10 7.6256

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.1914
2 0.1828
3 0.1779
4 0.1643
5 0.1636
6 0.1572
7 0.1556
8 0.1532
9 0.1521
10 0.1479

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1191
2 0.1162
3 0.1079
4 0.1061
5 0.1041
6 0.0894
7 0.0820
8 0.0796
9 0.0779
10 0.0745

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1514
2 0.1397
3 0.1336
4 0.1225
5 0.1046
6 0.1046
7 0.1033
8 0.0972
9 0.0927
10 0.0908


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek