Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

CCIW - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Ill. Wesleyan 1,526.3071 1,520.5032 1,523.4024 59.17 54.12 0.176
2nd Carthage 1,522.3509 1,522.3940 1,522.3724 61.30 53.71 0.206
3rd North Park 1,510.7435 1,508.2994 1,509.5210 58.52 54.27 0.184
4th Millikin 1,505.5216 1,506.8564 1,506.1888 59.65 53.29 0.183
5th Elmhurst 1,489.2648 1,490.2726 1,489.7686 59.16 50.61 0.167
6th Wheaton (IL) 1,461.9959 1,464.9336 1,463.4640 55.58 50.52 0.126
7th North Central (IL) 1,426.4003 1,428.7817 1,427.5905 59.27 49.00 0.105
8th Carroll (WI) 1,403.3777 1,398.5844 1,400.9790 55.31 47.03 0.085
9th Augustana (IL) 1,401.7991 1,398.8467 1,400.3221 56.43 47.18 0.062

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Carthage 0.2763 41.22 13.60 37.45 46.29 2.89 11.74
2nd North Park 0.2708 39.46 12.38 36.17 47.59 3.67 11.36
3rd Ill. Wesleyan 0.2512 38.84 13.72 36.19 46.28 3.27 10.51
4th Millikin 0.2466 38.06 13.40 35.26 47.02 3.56 11.01
5th Elmhurst 0.2362 37.41 13.79 34.83 50.33 2.94 10.28
6th North Central (IL) 0.2246 37.68 15.22 34.53 48.83 4.85 11.27
7th Wheaton (IL) 0.2225 37.22 14.97 34.31 49.38 3.47 10.58
8th Carroll (WI) 0.1894 34.53 15.60 32.02 49.82 4.84 9.54
9th Augustana (IL) 0.1659 34.33 17.74 31.91 51.41 4.41 11.02

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Millikin 0.0638 24.23 17.85 21.73 60.49 5.93 5.53
2nd Elmhurst 0.0689 23.91 17.02 22.84 60.80 5.64 4.72
3rd Carthage 0.0708 25.78 18.71 23.07 56.96 6.43 5.72
4th Ill. Wesleyan 0.0748 24.90 17.42 23.13 59.32 5.70 5.54
5th North Park 0.0869 25.72 17.03 23.66 60.55 4.81 6.80
6th Wheaton (IL) 0.0970 28.27 18.57 26.55 56.38 5.90 8.14
7th Augustana (IL) 0.1035 26.78 16.43 24.50 58.01 4.78 6.76
8th Carroll (WI) 0.1046 27.03 16.57 24.22 57.12 4.32 8.35
9th North Central (IL) 0.1195 29.06 17.11 25.64 53.78 5.72 8.40

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,471.5121 1,474.2692 1,479.3066 1,486.4738 1,477.8904
Difference 2.7571 7.7945 14.9617 8.5044

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
North Park 112 2,326 1,276 233 294 54.86 10.0 7.9 2,099 1,058 173 210 49.60 12.1 10.0
Carthage 123 2,440 1,362 251 267 55.82 9.7 9.1 2,259 1,168 189 195 48.30 12.0 11.6
Millikin 124 2,290 1,256 244 295 54.85 9.4 7.8 2,112 1,085 192 272 48.63 11.0 7.8
Ill. Wesleyan 111 2,332 1,237 193 183 53.05 12.1 12.7 2,221 1,146 164 200 48.40 13.5 11.1
Elmhurst 105 2,013 1,102 196 191 54.74 10.3 10.5 1,904 1,024 136 153 46.22 14.0 12.4
North Central (IL) 64 1,117 617 125 123 55.24 8.9 9.1 1,169 650 148 124 44.40 7.9 9.4
Augustana (IL) 118 2,080 1,096 219 243 52.69 9.5 8.6 2,220 1,261 211 231 43.20 10.5 9.6
Carroll (WI) 104 1,078 551 165 246 51.11 6.5 4.4 1,256 724 211 208 42.36 6.0 6.0
Wheaton (IL) 114 987 481 202 248 48.73 4.9 4.0 1,100 614 210 263 44.18 5.2 4.2
Conference Average 108 1,851 998 203 232 53.45 9.0 8.2 1,816 970 182 206 46.14 10.2 9.1
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the CCIW

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

71.03

2021-10-19
North Park
Elmhurst
2
3
25
22
24
26
23
25
25
5
13
15
GAME

70.37

2021-09-29 Chicago, Ill.
North Park
Ill. Wesleyan
2
3
21
25
26
24
25
13
25
27
4
15
GAME

70.26

2021-10-06
Ill. Wesleyan
North Central (IL)
3
1
23
25
25
21
25
20
28
26
GAME

70.24

2021-11-02
Wheaton (IL)
Millikin
2
3
16
25
17
25
25
17
26
24
16
18
GAME

69.75

2021-09-15
Elmhurst
Ill. Wesleyan
1
3
21
25
20
25
25
19
24
26
GAME

69.32

2021-10-16
Carthage
North Park
3
2
19
25
25
18
25
15
24
26
15
13
GAME

69.20

2021-10-13
Elmhurst
Millikin
3
2
25
22
20
25
21
25
25
17
15
5
GAME

69.01

2021-11-04
Carthage
North Park
3
1
23
25
25
22
25
23
25
23
GAME

68.62

2021-09-22
Millikin
North Park
3
2
14
25
19
25
25
19
25
20
15
13
GAME

68.10

2021-10-20
Millikin
North Central (IL)
3
2
25
20
26
28
25
21
25
27
15
9

HuskerGeek CCIW All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 18.5964
2 17.6790
3 17.1722
4 17.1666
5 16.5655
6 15.6381
7 15.1040
8 14.9066
9 14.6379
10 14.6020

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 10.3126
2 9.1576
3 9.0759
4 8.8242
5 8.7857
6 8.1436
7 8.1129
8 7.4522
9 7.2848
10 7.0996

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 16.4939
2 14.7481
3 14.5539
4 12.4739
5 12.1731
6 10.1104
7 9.8107
8 9.1704
9 9.0593
10 8.6643

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2089
2 0.1733
3 0.1702
4 0.1690
5 0.1684
6 0.1642
7 0.1575
8 0.1539
9 0.1535
10 0.1521

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1011
2 0.0987
3 0.0910
4 0.0909
5 0.0908
6 0.0889
7 0.0878
8 0.0857
9 0.0831
10 0.0803

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1692
2 0.1603
3 0.1513
4 0.1289
5 0.1274
6 0.1260
7 0.1193
8 0.1102
9 0.1066
10 0.0991


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek