Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

CIAA - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 2
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Shaw 1,381.0174 1,382.2461 1,381.6316 41.02 51.88 -0.064
2nd Virginia St. 1,287.3522 1,290.8778 1,289.1138 36.75 46.26 -0.148
3rd Virginia Union 1,267.1526 1,282.4063 1,274.7567 36.80 44.50 -0.198
4th Fayetteville St. 1,238.0486 1,256.7125 1,247.3456 33.36 45.06 -0.200
5th Winston-Salem 1,240.3765 1,248.0753 1,244.2199 35.81 44.92 -0.202
6th Johnson C. Smith 1,232.6233 1,247.6203 1,240.0991 35.27 44.00 -0.193
7th Chowan 1,177.2239 1,192.9452 1,185.0585 30.47 42.98 -0.290
8th Livingstone 1,158.2972 1,170.6498 1,164.4571 31.43 38.26 -0.301
9th Claflin 1,059.9630 1,081.5908 1,070.7223 27.45 34.55 -0.350
10th Elizabeth City St. 1,037.1894 1,067.3179 1,052.1458 25.03 33.51 -0.428
11th Saint Augustine's 1,022.5475 1,039.0020 1,030.7419 22.84 30.59 -0.451
12th Bowie St. 920.4710 962.2938 941.1501 18.05 29.05 -0.494
13th Lincoln (PA) 909.4839 927.6310 918.5126 22.30 24.95 -0.546

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Shaw 0.1586 33.73 17.87 30.90 52.06 4.66 7.16
2nd Winston-Salem 0.0804 27.80 19.76 25.64 58.93 5.50 7.05
3rd Virginia St. 0.0684 28.70 21.86 25.96 57.61 4.78 6.03
4th Fayetteville St. 0.0620 27.93 21.73 24.07 56.21 4.71 2.35
5th Johnson C. Smith 0.0554 24.87 19.33 21.92 62.65 5.70 4.21
6th Virginia Union 0.0534 24.45 19.11 22.61 60.40 4.49 4.38
7th Livingstone 0.0192 24.12 22.20 21.10 61.90 5.67 5.00
8th Chowan -0.0127 20.14 21.41 19.03 66.92 5.48 4.84
9th Claflin -0.0216 19.96 22.11 18.20 65.33 5.79 4.72
10th Elizabeth City St. -0.1027 14.68 24.96 13.08 74.37 5.89 5.23
11th Bowie St. -0.1072 14.75 25.47 12.88 69.19 4.90 2.93
12th Saint Augustine's -0.1228 12.62 24.89 11.50 73.85 6.97 1.57
13th Lincoln (PA) -0.1576 11.18 26.93 10.37 76.06 4.06 4.25

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Virginia St. 0.2164 36.91 15.27 33.89 50.69 4.17 8.08
2nd Shaw 0.2223 37.34 15.12 34.98 47.41 5.43 8.59
3rd Johnson C. Smith 0.2485 40.26 15.41 37.47 45.16 6.15 7.57
4th Virginia Union 0.2518 39.69 14.50 36.78 41.58 4.12 8.07
5th Fayetteville St. 0.2621 41.01 14.80 36.86 43.00 4.93 9.08
6th Chowan 0.2775 39.82 12.07 37.13 48.27 3.42 8.03
7th Winston-Salem 0.2825 42.12 13.87 39.65 43.21 4.60 11.10
8th Livingstone 0.3199 45.67 13.68 40.80 39.61 5.18 10.75
9th Elizabeth City St. 0.3257 45.57 13.00 40.81 39.22 3.29 12.02
10th Saint Augustine's 0.3280 44.75 11.95 41.19 43.22 2.26 10.90
11th Claflin 0.3288 45.31 12.43 41.43 38.80 4.36 13.74
12th Bowie St. 0.3870 50.67 11.97 45.27 32.08 2.29 14.81
13th Lincoln (PA) 0.3882 50.73 11.91 46.68 35.79 3.42 14.19

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,156.9196 1,158.1646 1,167.7274 1,172.0069 1,163.7047
Difference 1.2450 10.8078 15.0873 9.0467

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Shaw 106 2,411 1,275 237 214 52.88 10.2 11.3 1,987 823 147 203 58.58 13.5 9.8
Virginia St. 118 2,572 1,307 236 339 50.82 10.9 7.6 2,324 1,043 156 247 55.12 14.9 9.4
Fayetteville St. 89 1,918 926 111 149 48.28 17.3 12.9 1,826 829 141 187 54.60 13.0 9.8
Virginia Union 94 1,984 996 146 127 50.20 13.6 15.6 1,899 901 139 210 52.55 13.7 9.0
Johnson C. Smith 87 1,877 933 146 171 49.71 12.9 11.0 1,801 854 109 173 52.58 16.5 10.4
Winston-Salem 112 2,226 1,065 214 237 47.84 10.4 9.4 2,277 1,111 237 221 51.21 9.6 10.3
Livingstone 68 1,439 695 131 139 48.30 11.0 10.4 1,481 742 131 129 49.90 11.3 11.5
Chowan 103 2,091 930 171 225 44.48 12.2 9.3 2,233 1,081 149 228 51.59 15.0 9.8
Claflin 77 1,500 661 127 212 44.07 11.8 7.1 1,752 936 202 190 46.58 8.7 9.2
Elizabeth City St. 83 1,454 596 130 205 40.99 11.2 7.1 1,902 1,068 196 228 43.85 9.7 8.3
Saint Augustine's 69 1,100 433 74 141 39.36 14.9 7.8 1,556 911 147 161 41.45 10.6 9.7
Bowie St. 62 1,024 375 72 182 36.62 14.2 5.6 1,483 865 196 149 41.67 7.6 10.0
Lincoln (PA) 79 1,187 463 98 156 39.01 12.1 7.6 1,870 1,183 242 188 36.74 7.7 9.9
Conference Average 88 1,753 820 146 192 45.58 12.5 9.4 1,876 950 169 193 48.96 11.7 9.8
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the CIAA

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

60.91

 2018-10-29 Fayetteville, NC
Fayetteville St.
Shaw
3
1
19
25
25
19
25
21
25
23
GAME

60.56

 2018-09-09 Lincoln Univ., Pa.
Johnson C. Smith
Virginia Union
3
2
28
26
21
25
25
18
23
25
15
12
GAME

60.54

 2018-10-26 Winston-Salem, N.C.
Winston-Salem
Shaw
1
3
16
25
25
23
23
25
23
25
GAME

60.39

 2018-10-14 Richmond, VA
Virginia Union
Chowan
3
2
25
23
24
26
26
28
25
21
15
9
GAME

59.30

 2018-11-10 Salem, Va.
Shaw
Virginia St.
3
1
17
25
25
19
25
19
28
26
GAME

58.37

 2018-10-04 Fayetteville, NC
Fayetteville St.
Johnson C. Smith
3
2
25
20
27
29
20
25
25
12
15
11
GAME

58.30

 2018-09-08 Lincoln Univ., Pa.
Virginia Union
Winston-Salem
2
3
15
25
25
19
24
26
25
18
11
15
GAME

58.09

 2018-11-02 Murfreesboro, N.C.
Chowan
Virginia Union
3
2
20
25
25
13
19
25
25
22
15
13
GAME

57.87

 2018-10-23 Charlotte, NC
Johnson C. Smith
Shaw
3
2
24
26
25
21
27
25
15
25
16
14
GAME

57.82

 2018-09-22 Winston-Salem, N.C.
Johnson C. Smith
Virginia St.
2
3
27
25
25
23
18
25
25
27
6
15

HuskerGeek CIAA All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
Saraya Klink Shaw A
Teeya McLEAN Fayetteville St. A
Ambryanna Moore Virginia Union A
Keveesha Wattley Shaw A
Gorana Bogdanovic Johnson C. Smith D
Kelly Murphy Shaw D
Michelle Olmeda-Gonzalez Shaw S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
Ytae Cobb Winston-Salem A
Chynna Hunt Fayetteville St. A
Tapanga Moten Shaw A
Taylor Smith Johnson C. Smith A
Jamaica Adams Virginia Union D
Jada Starling Virginia Union D
A'Maria Wright Virginia Union S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1 Kelly Murphy Shaw
2 Gorana Bogdanovic Johnson C. Smith
3 Teeya McLEAN Fayetteville St.
4 Michelle Olmeda-Gonzalez Shaw
5 Saraya Klink Shaw

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1 Teeya McLEAN Fayetteville St.
2 Saraya Klink Shaw
3 Ambryanna Moore Virginia Union
4 Keveesha Wattley Shaw
5 Taylor Smith Johnson C. Smith

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1 Michelle Olmeda-Gonzalez Shaw
2 A'Maria Wright Virginia Union
3 Bria Anderson Virginia St.
4 Nakia McKinnie Fayetteville St.
5 Brittany Carpenter Winston-Salem

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1 Kelly Murphy Shaw
2 Jamaica Adams Virginia Union
3 Jailyn Ivey Virginia St.
4 Jasmine Jones Virginia St.
5 Georgina Diaz Johnson C. Smith

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 Kelly Murphy Shaw 14.2550
2 Micayla Pope Chowan 13.8393
3 Gorana Bogdanovic Johnson C. Smith 12.6274
4 Michelle Olmeda-Gonzalez Shaw 12.1650
5 A'Maria Wright Virginia Union 11.2124
6 Alyssa Born Chowan 10.9423
7 Kenedi Cannon Virginia St. 10.6967
8 Saraya Klink Shaw 10.6194
9 Bria Anderson Virginia St. 10.5560
10 Jada Starling Virginia Union 10.4417

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 Michelle Olmeda-Gonzalez Shaw 7.7124
2 Saraya Klink Shaw 7.5614
3 A'Maria Wright Virginia Union 7.1333
4 Micayla Pope Chowan 6.8833
5 Brittany Carpenter Winston-Salem 6.8191
6 Bria Anderson Virginia St. 6.5678
7 Courtney O'Keefe Chowan 6.2474
8 Gorana Bogdanovic Johnson C. Smith 6.0045
9 Ytae Cobb Winston-Salem 5.9968
10 Keveesha Wattley Shaw 5.9552

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 Alyssa Born Chowan 12.2212
2 Kelly Murphy Shaw 11.9509
3 Jamaica Adams Virginia Union 10.4155
4 Georgina Diaz Johnson C. Smith 9.4478
5 Gabrielle Azar Winston-Salem 9.2186
6 Sydney Hiner Chowan 9.2050
7 Jasmine Jones Virginia St. 8.4933
8 Jailyn Ivey Virginia St. 7.8488
9 Tiara Ramey Virginia St. 7.4661
10 Alexis WILLIAMS Livingstone 7.1814

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 Gorana Bogdanovic Johnson C. Smith 0.1451
2 Kelly Murphy Shaw 0.1345
3 Micayla Pope Chowan 0.1344
4 Jekisha Rhymes Livingstone 0.1303
5 Teeya McLEAN Fayetteville St. 0.1219
6 A'Maria Wright Virginia Union 0.1206
7 Michelle Olmeda-Gonzalez Shaw 0.1181
8 Jada Starling Virginia Union 0.1111
9 Sydney Hiner Chowan 0.1089
10 Jamaica Adams Virginia Union 0.1076

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 Teeya McLEAN Fayetteville St. 0.0837
2 A'Maria Wright Virginia Union 0.0767
3 Michelle Olmeda-Gonzalez Shaw 0.0749
4 Saraya Klink Shaw 0.0713
5 Gorana Bogdanovic Johnson C. Smith 0.0690
6 Micayla Pope Chowan 0.0668
7 Bria Anderson Virginia St. 0.0638
8 Brittany Carpenter Winston-Salem 0.0631
9 Nakia McKinnie Fayetteville St. 0.0623
10 Taylor Smith Johnson C. Smith 0.0618

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 Alyssa Born Chowan 0.1187
2 Kelly Murphy Shaw 0.1127
3 Jamaica Adams Virginia Union 0.1108
4 Georgina Diaz Johnson C. Smith 0.1086
5 Alexis WILLIAMS Livingstone 0.1056
6 Sydney Hiner Chowan 0.1001
7 Jhi Piper-Murles Claflin 0.0968
8 Jasmine Jones Virginia St. 0.0913
9 Gabrielle Azar Winston-Salem 0.0904
10 Janina Mayers Saint Augustine's 0.0771

Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
Rankings
Media
Nebraska
HuskerGeek 2024
HuskerGeek