Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

CSAC - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Cedar Crest 1,261.3475 1,259.4289 1,260.3878 53.82 40.41 -0.058
2nd Cairn 1,189.2434 1,189.9803 1,189.6118 51.97 40.70 -0.137
3rd Notre Dame (MD) 1,181.9630 1,183.6193 1,182.7908 54.17 34.88 -0.153
4th Keystone 1,109.5574 1,109.7205 1,109.6390 47.31 35.17 -0.233
5th Rosemont 1,036.6715 1,042.9150 1,039.7885 44.80 33.06 -0.267
6th Wilson 899.8529 897.3259 898.5885 42.27 27.12 -0.416
7th Saint Elizabeth 843.9711 840.8892 842.4287 41.28 22.57 -0.457
8th Bryn Athyn 837.9713 833.7265 835.8462 43.24 24.52 -0.482
9th Clarks Summit 776.9720 779.9335 778.4513 38.63 21.20 -0.502
10th Valley Forge 725.6416 729.3105 727.4737 40.37 18.79 -0.644

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Cedar Crest 0.0997 27.22 17.24 25.05 60.83 4.17 9.09
2nd Cairn 0.0791 22.79 14.88 22.17 64.47 4.48 8.03
3rd Keystone 0.0302 20.96 17.95 18.64 61.23 4.21 7.07
4th Notre Dame (MD) 0.0241 20.78 18.37 18.83 59.77 4.34 8.97
5th Rosemont 0.0135 20.43 19.08 18.11 58.90 4.67 7.13
6th Wilson -0.0729 17.76 25.05 17.19 69.23 5.75 5.69
7th Clarks Summit -0.1133 12.04 23.38 9.96 72.72 3.39 2.49
8th Bryn Athyn -0.1160 11.60 23.21 10.63 76.57 5.36 5.40
9th Saint Elizabeth -0.1198 13.40 25.38 12.94 72.97 4.51 2.76
10th Valley Forge -0.2609 7.32 33.40 5.50 76.98 4.88 6.95

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Cedar Crest 0.1576 31.78 16.02 29.07 54.84 4.98 11.72
2nd Notre Dame (MD) 0.1775 31.98 14.23 28.01 50.05 2.82 9.96
3rd Cairn 0.2159 35.49 13.90 32.94 53.32 2.02 11.01
4th Keystone 0.2631 39.15 12.84 35.88 43.25 1.01 16.43
5th Rosemont 0.2804 38.98 10.94 33.91 41.53 2.48 15.34
6th Saint Elizabeth 0.3375 45.87 12.12 40.48 37.38 2.23 21.74
7th Wilson 0.3430 47.65 13.35 42.84 39.53 1.22 19.78
8th Bryn Athyn 0.3663 49.27 12.64 44.10 32.20 0.71 24.97
9th Valley Forge 0.3835 51.21 12.87 46.61 31.09 0.62 24.48
10th Clarks Summit 0.3891 50.32 11.40 44.45 31.44 0.63 22.10

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 986.5006 984.6431 984.8470 972.6112 982.1505
Difference -1.8575 -1.6537 -13.8895 -5.8002

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Cairn 87 1,901 1,235 269 193 64.97 7.1 9.8 1,545 838 149 170 45.76 10.4 9.1
Cedar Crest 75 1,614 1,019 222 149 63.14 7.3 10.8 1,362 777 149 134 42.95 9.1 10.2
Notre Dame (MD) 74 1,677 1,097 258 138 65.41 6.5 12.2 1,434 866 127 151 39.61 11.3 9.5
Keystone 84 1,753 1,069 231 156 60.98 7.6 11.2 1,685 1,008 247 249 40.18 6.8 6.8
Rosemont 65 1,202 690 164 163 57.40 7.3 7.4 1,306 812 193 154 37.83 6.8 8.5
Bryn Athyn 55 843 489 106 98 58.01 8.0 8.6 1,272 883 291 153 30.58 4.4 8.3
Saint Elizabeth 73 1,086 618 140 162 56.91 7.8 6.7 1,593 1,130 315 175 29.07 5.1 9.1
Wilson 77 1,118 603 134 178 53.94 8.3 6.3 1,703 1,170 328 157 31.30 5.2 10.8
Valley Forge 56 712 412 114 178 57.87 6.2 4.0 1,204 886 275 151 26.41 4.4 8.0
Clarks Summit 78 1,005 520 92 180 51.74 10.9 5.6 1,799 1,329 389 205 26.13 4.6 8.8
Conference Average 72 1,291 775 173 160 59.04 7.7 8.3 1,490 970 246 170 34.98 6.8 8.9
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the CSAC

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

56.68

2022-10-19
Cairn
Cedar Crest
0
3
17
25
23
25
19
25
GAME

54.80

2022-10-26
Notre Dame (MD)
Cedar Crest
1
3
21
25
16
25
25
22
11
25
GAME

54.67

2022-10-12
Cairn
Notre Dame (MD)
1
3
26
24
18
25
19
25
23
25
GAME

54.62

2022-10-11
Keystone
Cedar Crest
3
1
25
16
27
25
19
25
25
19
GAME

54.45

2022-11-05
Cedar Crest
Notre Dame (MD)
3
0
25
23
25
13
25
15
GAME

53.36

2022-10-15
Cairn
Keystone
3
1
22
25
25
9
25
21
25
19
GAME

52.11

2022-11-03
Notre Dame (MD)
Cairn
3
2
22
25
25
19
25
20
11
25
15
10
GAME

50.84

2022-11-03
Cedar Crest
Keystone
3
0
25
10
25
16
25
9
GAME

49.55

2022-10-22
Rosemont
Notre Dame (MD)
1
3
27
25
14
25
17
25
17
25
GAME

49.23

2022-10-25
Rosemont
Keystone
2
3
21
25
25
19
20
25
25
17
15
17

HuskerGeek CSAC All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
D

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 13.8512
2 12.8256
3 12.6977
4 11.8127
5 11.6023
6 10.1435
7 9.2784
8 8.7119
9 8.1349
10 8.0503

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 8.3119
2 7.3500
3 7.2982
4 5.4314
5 4.7113
6 4.1488
7 4.1407
8 4.0257
9 3.8977
10 3.4324

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 9.3047
2 9.1963
3 8.4197
4 8.2444
5 7.8213
6 6.3992
7 6.3489
8 6.0634
9 5.5537
10 5.5274

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.1693
2 0.1649
3 0.1634
4 0.1534
5 0.1527
6 0.1237
7 0.1227
8 0.1208
9 0.1120
10 0.1114

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1079
2 0.0980
3 0.0869
4 0.0669
5 0.0664
6 0.0647
7 0.0583
8 0.0575
9 0.0531
10 0.0475

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1295
2 0.1241
3 0.1222
4 0.1002
5 0.0981
6 0.0839
7 0.0810
8 0.0761
9 0.0756
10 0.0722


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek