Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

CUNYAC - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Hunter 1,328.8774 1,289.7244 1,309.1546 47.96 54.33 0.021
2nd Baruch 1,235.5680 1,198.2087 1,216.7450 44.58 47.73 -0.098
3rd Brooklyn 1,170.5352 1,130.8713 1,150.5324 42.45 45.08 -0.168
4th CCNY 1,063.5908 1,023.8399 1,043.5261 38.69 37.25 -0.265
5th John Jay 1,051.7516 1,011.9095 1,031.6382 38.34 37.03 -0.266
6th Lehman 836.3942 800.7859 818.3964 31.74 29.11 -0.508
7th York (NY) 758.6141 722.8423 740.5122 26.14 26.10 -0.532
8th Medgar Evers 703.1166 667.5372 685.0960 29.02 21.78 -0.610

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Hunter 0.1818 33.59 15.41 31.01 54.59 3.69 7.57
2nd Baruch 0.1132 27.07 15.74 25.02 58.46 4.25 9.21
3rd Brooklyn 0.0472 22.16 17.44 21.16 65.10 5.03 8.44
4th John Jay 0.0118 22.84 21.66 21.27 62.36 4.21 8.18
5th CCNY -0.0027 21.54 21.81 20.65 62.13 6.10 6.95
6th York (NY) -0.1618 9.46 25.64 8.72 78.83 4.27 -0.15
7th Lehman -0.1685 11.00 27.85 10.10 77.39 3.97 5.61
8th Medgar Evers -0.2054 7.60 28.13 6.22 82.58 3.68 0.50

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Hunter 0.1604 31.96 15.92 30.02 52.73 4.80 8.12
2nd Baruch 0.2111 35.51 14.40 32.45 51.26 3.45 9.86
3rd Brooklyn 0.2154 36.01 14.47 33.90 52.83 1.92 12.80
4th CCNY 0.2625 39.65 13.41 36.45 48.65 1.93 15.14
5th John Jay 0.2779 41.75 13.96 36.33 45.08 2.86 16.71
6th Lehman 0.3394 46.98 13.04 42.80 41.28 1.21 21.38
7th York (NY) 0.3699 49.05 12.06 45.49 38.80 1.64 24.06
8th Medgar Evers 0.4050 52.47 11.97 47.81 34.34 3.41 28.17

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 999.4501 1,000.2250 1,011.0233 1,037.5821 1,012.0701
Difference 0.7749 11.5732 38.1321 16.8267

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Baruch 100 1,916 1,224 304 180 63.88 6.3 10.6 1,362 641 159 175 52.94 8.6 7.8
Brooklyn 106 2,201 1,295 306 211 58.84 7.2 10.4 1,875 942 228 226 49.76 8.2 8.3
CCNY 67 1,308 749 220 171 57.26 5.9 7.6 1,168 622 174 159 46.75 6.7 7.3
John Jay 78 1,204 712 187 194 59.14 6.4 6.2 1,460 845 242 168 42.12 6.0 8.7
Hunter 117 2,069 990 211 232 47.85 9.8 8.9 2,145 1,053 194 198 50.91 11.1 10.8
York (NY) 67 1,174 631 141 162 53.75 8.3 7.2 1,456 914 305 195 37.23 4.8 7.5
Lehman 90 1,241 590 153 159 47.54 8.1 7.8 1,838 1,194 424 223 35.04 4.3 8.2
Medgar Evers 72 992 478 97 174 48.19 10.2 5.7 1,624 1,112 428 181 31.53 3.8 9.0
Conference Average 87 1,513 834 202 185 54.56 7.8 8.1 1,616 915 269 191 43.28 6.7 8.5
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the CUNYAC

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

56.05

2019-10-22 New York, NY
Baruch
Hunter
2
3
25
19
21
25
17
25
25
15
8
15
GAME

54.49

2019-10-29 Brooklyn, NY
Brooklyn
Baruch
1
3
16
25
25
19
21
25
22
25
GAME

53.40

2019-09-14 New York, NY
Hunter
Brooklyn
3
0
25
20
25
12
25
14
GAME

51.66

2019-10-12 Brooklyn, NY
Brooklyn
CCNY
3
1
23
25
25
22
25
21
25
18
GAME

48.94

2019-10-08 New York, NY
John Jay
Hunter
0
3
16
25
14
25
15
25
GAME

48.66

2019-09-14 New York, NY
Baruch
CCNY
3
0
25
15
25
19
25
15
GAME

47.47

2019-09-14 New York, NY
John Jay
Baruch
1
3
25
22
13
25
18
25
10
25
GAME

46.06

2019-09-19 Brooklyn, NY
Brooklyn
John Jay
3
0
25
17
25
17
25
13
GAME

45.67

2019-09-14 New York, NY
John Jay
CCNY
1
3
18
25
21
25
25
23
15
25
GAME

43.65

2019-09-14 New York, NY
Hunter
Lehman
3
0
25
3
25
15
25
8

HuskerGeek CUNYAC All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 16.2379
2 15.0539
3 14.6942
4 14.6688
5 13.8309
6 12.4771
7 11.2716
8 11.0160
9 8.3868
10 7.7512

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 10.1266
2 8.4480
3 7.9215
4 7.1550
5 5.7890
6 5.4440
7 4.9423
8 4.5046
9 4.4535
10 4.1693

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 11.9540
2 11.8544
3 9.2248
4 8.9052
5 8.3885
6 6.8452
7 6.6060
8 6.1113
9 5.9094
10 5.5767

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.1888
2 0.1844
3 0.1552
4 0.1544
5 0.1531
6 0.1394
7 0.1300
8 0.1266
9 0.1253
10 0.1217

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1178
2 0.1056
3 0.0906
4 0.0871
5 0.0819
6 0.0795
7 0.0742
8 0.0652
9 0.0603
10 0.0573

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1332
2 0.1245
3 0.0971
4 0.0932
5 0.0928
6 0.0925
7 0.0899
8 0.0819
9 0.0788
10 0.0725


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek