Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

Centennial - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Johns Hopkins 1,598.2189 1,595.5780 1,596.8979 64.48 58.09 0.297
2nd Haverford 1,448.0315 1,445.0401 1,446.5350 54.36 56.39 0.138
3rd Gettysburg 1,431.9803 1,425.6252 1,428.7992 55.07 51.55 0.133
4th Swarthmore 1,429.4914 1,418.8642 1,424.1679 50.71 53.80 0.094
5th Dickinson 1,416.2606 1,416.3679 1,416.3143 61.90 46.90 0.105
6th Franklin & Marshall 1,412.4711 1,412.0616 1,412.2663 60.70 40.97 0.116
7th Muhlenberg 1,331.0664 1,326.9397 1,329.0014 52.74 49.17 -0.014
8th McDaniel 1,312.9580 1,311.5350 1,312.2463 49.55 49.90 0.013
9th Ursinus 1,258.5890 1,253.7986 1,256.1915 53.66 44.69 -0.067
10th Washington Col. 1,251.7884 1,246.4273 1,249.1050 50.62 40.67 -0.044
11th Bryn Mawr 1,092.2515 1,084.9085 1,088.5738 45.49 37.33 -0.290

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Johns Hopkins 0.3305 45.68 12.63 40.57 39.30 3.75 12.01
2nd Haverford 0.2417 38.21 14.04 35.25 47.13 3.91 11.07
3rd Gettysburg 0.2334 36.94 13.60 34.53 48.58 2.97 8.67
4th Swarthmore 0.2249 36.68 14.19 31.69 50.09 3.08 10.68
5th Dickinson 0.2211 35.88 13.77 32.55 54.89 4.10 9.59
6th McDaniel 0.1964 35.15 15.50 32.33 46.62 5.50 9.55
7th Franklin & Marshall 0.1938 34.20 14.81 30.82 47.20 3.08 14.26
8th Ursinus 0.1309 30.20 17.10 27.47 55.70 4.00 10.04
9th Washington Col. 0.1301 31.50 18.48 29.00 52.67 5.00 9.59
10th Muhlenberg 0.1238 29.79 17.40 27.23 54.82 3.11 9.23
11th Bryn Mawr -0.0085 18.86 19.70 17.45 67.34 4.45 8.13

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Johns Hopkins 0.0335 23.75 20.39 21.87 61.37 6.73 6.69
2nd Franklin & Marshall 0.0782 25.53 17.71 22.87 59.12 5.27 7.40
3rd Gettysburg 0.1005 27.73 17.68 26.12 58.55 5.47 7.82
4th Haverford 0.1042 27.58 17.16 26.01 58.05 5.87 6.72
5th Dickinson 0.1166 28.48 16.82 26.20 56.68 5.92 7.44
6th Swarthmore 0.1308 29.42 16.34 27.23 57.00 2.74 8.70
7th Muhlenberg 0.1375 29.91 16.16 27.88 55.66 2.74 8.53
8th Washington Col. 0.1745 35.10 17.65 32.42 50.21 5.51 10.97
9th McDaniel 0.1839 34.11 15.73 30.38 52.50 3.40 7.89
10th Ursinus 0.1975 35.71 15.96 33.53 51.11 3.28 11.73
11th Bryn Mawr 0.2818 41.37 13.19 38.40 46.12 0.87 12.87

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,360.0090 1,363.8474 1,368.4267 1,378.7992 1,367.7706
Difference 3.8385 8.4177 18.7903 10.3488

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Johns Hopkins 109 1,983 1,169 259 210 58.95 7.7 9.4 1,502 682 150 182 54.59 10.0 8.3
Dickinson 79 1,194 721 145 159 60.39 8.2 7.5 1,070 590 143 147 44.86 7.5 7.3
Haverford 107 1,795 919 218 221 51.20 8.2 8.1 1,653 776 173 201 53.06 9.6 8.2
Gettysburg 84 1,050 560 142 158 53.33 7.4 6.6 1,007 522 147 126 48.16 6.9 8.0
Muhlenberg 82 1,102 591 155 100 53.63 7.1 11.0 1,096 573 174 180 47.72 6.3 6.1
Ursinus 73 1,394 765 160 152 54.88 8.7 9.2 1,423 794 190 149 44.20 7.5 9.6
Swarthmore 76 1,012 472 152 129 46.64 6.7 7.8 1,018 498 163 173 51.08 6.2 5.9
Franklin & Marshall 91 1,073 627 231 225 58.43 4.6 4.8 1,084 664 163 163 38.75 6.7 6.7
McDaniel 87 1,214 587 163 298 48.35 7.4 4.1 1,338 695 177 187 48.06 7.6 7.2
Washington Col. 76 688 362 175 184 52.62 3.9 3.7 810 486 192 131 40.00 4.2 6.2
Bryn Mawr 71 945 496 149 139 52.49 6.3 6.8 1,168 709 200 208 39.30 5.8 5.6
Conference Average 85 1,223 661 177 180 53.72 6.9 7.2 1,197 635 170 168 46.34 7.1 7.2
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the Centennial

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

70.29

2021-11-06
Johns Hopkins
Gettysburg
3
2
25
18
25
27
25
27
25
9
15
9
GAME

68.48

2021-09-29
Franklin & Marshall
Gettysburg
3
2
25
11
24
26
21
25
25
19
15
10
GAME

66.69

2021-11-06 Baltimore, MD
Haverford
Swarthmore
3
0
25
20
25
23
30
28
GAME

65.04

2021-09-25 Haverford, Pa.
Haverford
McDaniel
3
2
25
18
23
25
25
16
23
25
15
9
GAME

64.89

2021-11-07 Baltimore, MD
Johns Hopkins
Haverford
3
0
25
10
25
16
25
15
GAME

64.77

2021-10-13
Dickinson
Franklin & Marshall
2
3
20
25
25
23
14
25
25
15
13
15
GAME

64.56

2021-10-02 Swarthmore, Pa.
Swarthmore
Gettysburg
3
1
21
25
25
22
25
23
25
17
GAME

64.47

2021-10-02 Haverford, Pa.
Haverford
Johns Hopkins
0
3
20
25
7
25
18
25
GAME

64.34

2021-10-09
Dickinson
Haverford
0
3
20
25
21
25
21
25
GAME

63.63

2021-09-29
Johns Hopkins
Dickinson
3
0
25
13
25
17
25
13

HuskerGeek Centennial All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 16.9858
2 14.0090
3 13.6438
4 12.7568
5 12.2020
6 9.3905
7 8.7400
8 8.3901
9 8.3192
10 8.1822

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 11.1686
2 8.3414
3 7.3972
4 6.9842
5 6.4591
6 6.1891
7 5.3032
8 5.2173
9 5.1033
10 4.6783

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 13.4556
2 7.2152
3 6.9458
4 6.8211
5 6.6596
6 6.6056
7 6.3121
8 6.2366
9 5.8171
10 5.2430

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2653
2 0.2265
3 0.2025
4 0.1952
5 0.1844
6 0.1748
7 0.1730
8 0.1708
9 0.1631
10 0.1533

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1608
2 0.1489
3 0.1324
4 0.1304
5 0.1120
6 0.0982
7 0.0944
8 0.0820
9 0.0810
10 0.0797

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1661
2 0.1447
3 0.1421
4 0.1417
5 0.1270
6 0.1214
7 0.1127
8 0.1045
9 0.1038
10 0.0989


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek