Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

Colonial - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 1
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Towson 1,467.6252 1,447.1910 1,457.3723 44.39 61.42 0.068
2nd Northeastern 1,468.5825 1,438.8196 1,453.6249 45.79 60.21 0.043
3rd Delaware 1,410.6490 1,415.6843 1,413.1644 43.12 58.38 0.005
4th James Madison 1,408.3384 1,393.3276 1,400.8129 41.11 59.64 0.005
5th Hofstra 1,359.1905 1,350.6552 1,354.9161 41.26 55.14 -0.046
6th UNCW 1,336.1107 1,321.9056 1,328.9892 39.41 55.23 -0.062
7th William & Mary 1,338.4078 1,318.6784 1,328.5065 39.29 55.13 -0.061
8th Georgia St. 1,300.7933 1,284.3579 1,292.5494 38.32 52.60 -0.074
9th George Mason 1,275.9198 1,273.4625 1,274.6906 38.48 52.33 -0.065

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Towson 0.2650 43.18 16.68 40.44 39.48 5.99 5.37
2nd Northeastern 0.2251 38.50 15.98 35.73 45.52 6.06 6.53
3rd James Madison 0.2123 33.94 12.71 31.09 53.64 4.86 5.68
4th Delaware 0.1961 32.90 13.29 30.67 53.68 5.95 5.31
5th William & Mary 0.1715 32.94 15.78 31.16 53.13 5.69 4.65
6th UNCW 0.1687 34.47 17.60 32.28 50.96 6.32 6.06
7th George Mason 0.1681 32.70 15.89 30.20 53.56 5.61 5.03
8th Hofstra 0.1652 36.21 19.69 34.08 45.93 6.41 5.94
9th Georgia St. 0.1364 29.26 15.62 27.10 57.78 5.42 4.68

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Northeastern 0.1819 33.62 15.43 31.32 51.70 5.57 4.95
2nd Delaware 0.1915 34.14 14.99 32.06 52.54 4.98 5.48
3rd Towson 0.1967 36.10 16.43 33.96 47.78 5.93 3.87
4th James Madison 0.2071 34.50 13.79 32.11 52.65 4.26 3.74
5th Georgia St. 0.2108 36.38 15.30 33.78 49.41 5.79 5.47
6th Hofstra 0.2109 36.72 15.63 34.27 46.73 6.34 6.27
7th UNCW 0.2305 38.80 15.74 36.35 46.24 6.18 5.41
8th William & Mary 0.2324 37.81 14.57 35.86 48.98 5.14 4.94
9th George Mason 0.2328 37.67 14.39 34.72 47.79 5.55 6.28

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,367.1807 1,367.5091 1,365.2778 1,361.5727 1,365.3851
Difference 0.3284 -1.9029 -5.6080 -2.3942

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Towson 103 2,405 1,143 136 223 47.53 17.7 10.8 2,070 770 77 179 62.80 26.9 11.6
Northeastern 96 2,220 1,044 144 153 47.03 15.4 14.5 1,996 795 100 160 60.17 20.0 12.5
James Madison 108 2,409 1,035 141 255 42.96 17.1 9.4 2,318 947 92 189 59.15 25.2 12.3
Delaware 109 2,359 1,038 122 146 44.00 19.3 16.2 2,294 972 129 203 57.63 17.8 11.3
Hofstra 132 2,867 1,266 180 230 44.16 15.9 12.5 2,839 1,237 175 190 56.43 16.2 14.9
William & Mary 103 2,283 972 118 182 42.58 19.3 12.5 2,300 995 114 189 56.74 20.2 12.2
UNCW 104 2,057 872 142 155 42.39 14.5 13.3 2,110 931 122 212 55.88 17.3 10.0
George Mason 92 1,672 673 98 184 40.25 17.1 9.1 1,867 885 142 151 52.60 13.1 12.4
Georgia St. 81 1,630 618 69 118 37.91 23.6 13.8 1,922 933 106 132 51.46 18.1 14.6
Conference Average 103 2,211 962 128 183 43.20 17.8 12.5 2,191 941 117 178 56.98 19.4 12.4
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the Colonial

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

71.23

2012-11-16 Towson, Md.
James Madison
Northeastern
3
2
21
25
22
25
25
23
29
27
15
7
GAME

69.35

2012-10-13 Fairfax, Va.
George Mason
Delaware
2
3
19
25
29
27
25
23
17
25
14
16
GAME

67.95

2012-10-19 Newark, Del.
Delaware
Northeastern
3
2
26
28
25
19
20
25
25
17
15
10
GAME

67.76

2012-10-14 Harrisonburg, Va.
James Madison
Towson
2
3
25
27
25
18
25
15
15
25
13
15
GAME

67.71

2012-11-02 Fairfax, Va.
George Mason
James Madison
3
2
25
23
26
24
19
25
22
25
15
11
GAME

66.80

2012-11-09 Harrisonburg, Va.
James Madison
Northeastern
3
0
25
19
25
23
25
20
GAME

66.29

2012-10-28 Wilmington, N.C.
UNCW
James Madison
3
1
25
20
27
25
21
25
25
21
GAME

66.09

2012-10-26 Williamsburg, Va.
William & Mary
James Madison
3
2
25
22
26
24
23
25
16
25
15
7
GAME

66.02

2012-10-26 Newark, Del.
Delaware
Towson
1
3
25
23
22
25
22
25
13
25
GAME

65.71

2012-10-13 Atlanta, Ga.
Georgia St.
UNCW
3
2
24
26
28
26
22
25
26
24
15
8

HuskerGeek Colonial All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 23.0621
2 22.3861
3 22.0882
4 22.0726
5 20.3433
6 19.2801
7 18.2702
8 18.0822
9 17.6529
10 17.4115

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 14.0431
2 13.5789
3 12.8138
4 11.2155
5 11.0525
6 10.9317
7 10.5050
8 10.2226
9 10.2129
10 9.6350

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 19.1198
2 16.7924
3 16.3832
4 14.3910
5 13.3230
6 12.5571
7 11.9602
8 11.8657
9 11.1725
10 10.6719

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2179
2 0.2116
3 0.2045
4 0.2034
5 0.1903
6 0.1884
7 0.1867
8 0.1812
9 0.1769
10 0.1756

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1404
2 0.1261
3 0.1168
4 0.1029
5 0.1004
6 0.1003
7 0.0971
8 0.0964
9 0.0947
10 0.0936

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1777
2 0.1754
3 0.1707
4 0.1464
5 0.1451
6 0.1312
7 0.1272
8 0.1161
9 0.1152
10 0.1112


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek