Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

G-MAC - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 2
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Cedarville 1,427.7481 1,447.8441 1,437.7610 44.52 57.03 -0.001
2nd Trevecca Nazarene 1,405.6221 1,450.5959 1,427.9320 44.84 55.71 0.003
3rd Alderson Broaddus 1,329.5085 1,345.5840 1,337.5221 41.60 51.61 -0.068
4th Ky. Wesleyan 1,316.3240 1,347.9457 1,332.0410 38.47 50.86 -0.101
5th Ursuline 1,320.5541 1,340.5926 1,330.5356 40.07 50.76 -0.078
6th Davis & Elkins 1,299.8350 1,343.3827 1,321.4295 38.39 48.87 -0.122
7th Ohio Valley 1,265.6856 1,290.9709 1,278.2657 41.42 46.11 -0.137
8th Salem Int'l 1,183.8545 1,208.7280 1,196.2266 35.10 42.11 -0.223

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Cedarville 0.2061 35.84 15.23 33.09 50.59 6.02 8.46
2nd Trevecca Nazarene 0.1695 33.46 16.51 32.02 51.68 5.23 5.85
3rd Alderson Broaddus 0.1386 28.73 14.87 26.88 59.71 5.30 6.47
4th Ursuline 0.1306 28.83 15.77 27.12 58.30 4.78 8.78
5th Ky. Wesleyan 0.1298 31.59 18.61 29.36 50.63 5.68 6.99
6th Ohio Valley 0.1076 27.32 16.57 25.73 57.75 6.61 8.33
7th Davis & Elkins 0.1041 28.71 18.30 27.00 55.76 5.94 6.31
8th Salem Int'l 0.0433 24.23 19.89 21.65 60.98 6.69 6.66

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Trevecca Nazarene 0.1660 33.06 16.45 31.17 52.68 5.11 4.79
2nd Alderson Broaddus 0.2071 34.83 14.12 33.01 50.98 4.50 6.97
3rd Cedarville 0.2072 35.81 15.09 33.43 49.17 5.30 5.47
4th Ursuline 0.2090 35.01 14.11 32.35 51.99 4.63 7.71
5th Davis & Elkins 0.2258 37.02 14.44 34.70 46.73 4.25 6.76
6th Ky. Wesleyan 0.2306 37.45 14.39 34.61 47.17 4.25 6.88
7th Ohio Valley 0.2446 37.60 13.14 34.25 53.10 3.90 6.34
8th Salem Int'l 0.2660 40.96 14.35 38.09 43.66 3.35 9.08

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,332.7142 1,337.9543 1,330.3821 1,331.2883 1,333.0847
Difference 5.2401 -2.3321 -1.4259 0.4940

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Trevecca Nazarene 115 2,539 1,207 153 184 47.54 16.6 13.8 2,403 1,052 133 168 56.22 18.1 14.3
Cedarville 118 2,501 1,154 223 250 46.14 11.2 10.0 2,425 1,076 150 236 55.63 16.2 10.3
Alderson Broaddus 115 2,035 927 150 162 45.55 13.6 12.6 2,097 995 203 193 52.55 10.3 10.9
Davis & Elkins 107 1,917 853 173 159 44.50 11.1 12.1 2,068 1,008 172 207 51.26 12.0 10.0
Ursuline 121 2,426 1,066 222 284 43.94 10.9 8.5 2,593 1,258 225 228 51.49 11.5 11.4
Ohio Valley 105 1,570 710 176 183 45.22 8.9 8.6 1,790 947 159 190 47.10 11.3 9.4
Salem Int'l 84 1,120 495 134 155 44.20 8.4 7.2 1,319 707 209 168 46.40 6.3 7.9
Ky. Wesleyan 100 1,779 714 128 179 40.14 13.9 9.9 2,110 1,057 166 165 49.91 12.7 12.8
Conference Average 108 1,986 891 170 195 44.65 11.8 10.3 2,101 1,013 177 194 51.32 12.3 10.9
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the G-MAC

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

68.00

2015-10-02
Ursuline
Trevecca Nazarene
2
3
25
17
22
25
24
26
25
21
13
15
GAME

67.09

2015-10-30 Nashville, TN
Trevecca Nazarene
Cedarville
2
3
22
25
25
17
24
26
25
22
10
15
GAME

66.91

2015-09-25 Cedarville, OH
Cedarville
Alderson Broaddus
3
1
25
22
25
23
23
25
25
13
GAME

65.88

2015-10-09 Philippi, WV
Alderson Broaddus
Trevecca Nazarene
3
1
25
21
22
25
25
13
25
22
GAME

65.88

2015-11-04
Ursuline
Cedarville
1
3
21
25
26
24
14
25
19
25
GAME

65.50

2015-11-14 Vienna, W. Va.
Ohio Valley
Davis & Elkins
2
3
22
25
25
23
19
25
25
23
13
15
GAME

65.13

2015-10-03 Cedarville, OH
Cedarville
Trevecca Nazarene
3
1
22
25
25
14
25
23
25
19
GAME

64.72

2015-11-13 Vienna, W. Va.
Ohio Valley
Alderson Broaddus
1
3
21
25
25
17
24
26
28
30
GAME

64.33

2015-10-24 Vienna, WV
Ohio Valley
Cedarville
3
1
22
25
27
25
25
15
25
22
GAME

64.12

2015-11-19 Mason, Ohio
Davis & Elkins
Ursuline
3
1
19
25
25
21
27
25
27
25

HuskerGeek G-MAC All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 26.0702
2 20.8643
3 19.9353
4 17.9529
5 17.7386
6 17.5564
7 15.8001
8 14.9447
9 13.9527
10 13.5173

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 15.0130
2 14.3269
3 13.7757
4 9.8735
5 9.5868
6 8.5269
7 7.9212
8 7.7172
9 7.4059
10 7.3286

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 18.0582
2 15.5650
3 13.8646
4 12.9332
5 11.0572
6 10.2804
7 10.1545
8 9.9956
9 9.6613
10 9.6352

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2267
2 0.1890
3 0.1830
4 0.1765
5 0.1756
6 0.1749
7 0.1713
8 0.1577
9 0.1568
10 0.1525

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1305
2 0.1257
3 0.1208
4 0.1002
5 0.0963
6 0.0949
7 0.0949
8 0.0898
9 0.0874
10 0.0748

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1901
2 0.1658
3 0.1377
4 0.1185
5 0.1168
6 0.1075
7 0.0961
8 0.0901
9 0.0895
10 0.0893


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek