Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

G-MAC - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 2
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Hillsdale 1,578.8082 1,555.8870 1,567.3057 52.08 65.00 0.154
2nd Hillsdale 1,578.8082 1,555.8870 1,567.3057 52.08 65.00 0.154
3rd Findlay 1,539.5129 1,512.1964 1,525.7935 49.08 64.01 0.128
4th Findlay 1,539.5129 1,512.1964 1,525.7935 49.08 64.01 0.128
5th Lake Erie 1,489.1330 1,474.0654 1,481.5800 46.50 62.69 0.076
6th Lake Erie 1,489.1330 1,474.0654 1,481.5800 46.50 62.69 0.076
7th Cedarville 1,468.8209 1,430.1296 1,449.3461 46.82 57.78 0.044
8th Walsh 1,450.8721 1,413.6746 1,432.1526 45.38 58.36 0.033
9th Walsh 1,450.8721 1,413.6746 1,432.1526 45.38 58.36 0.033
10th Malone 1,411.4745 1,383.2748 1,397.3035 44.32 55.59 0.006
11th Ky. Wesleyan 1,343.3760 1,336.5868 1,339.9771 41.48 52.56 -0.048
12th Davis & Elkins 1,330.8157 1,301.4655 1,316.0588 39.78 50.17 -0.096
13th Ohio Valley 1,311.9274 1,296.6341 1,304.2583 39.95 50.40 -0.078
14th Ohio Dominican 1,306.7112 1,287.3939 1,297.0166 40.27 50.48 -0.085
15th Ohio Dominican 1,306.7112 1,287.3939 1,297.0166 40.27 50.48 -0.085
16th Ursuline 1,295.4649 1,283.4434 1,289.4401 40.43 47.67 -0.105
17th Alderson Broaddus 1,279.0815 1,266.3907 1,272.7202 40.02 48.25 -0.137
18th Trevecca Nazarene 1,280.5572 1,260.9232 1,270.7023 38.79 48.31 -0.137

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Hillsdale 0.2853 41.38 12.85 37.93 44.11 4.59 7.92
2nd Hillsdale 0.2853 41.38 12.85 37.93 44.11 4.59 7.92
3rd Findlay 0.2672 39.78 13.06 37.97 45.88 4.20 7.94
4th Findlay 0.2672 39.78 13.06 37.97 45.88 4.20 7.94
5th Lake Erie 0.2301 37.46 14.46 35.48 49.33 4.64 5.39
6th Lake Erie 0.2301 37.46 14.46 35.48 49.33 4.64 5.39
7th Walsh 0.2121 35.35 14.14 33.07 52.87 4.65 6.73
8th Walsh 0.2121 35.35 14.14 33.07 52.87 4.65 6.73
9th Cedarville 0.1995 35.55 15.60 32.65 50.87 5.42 8.17
10th Malone 0.1769 32.00 14.31 29.69 54.55 4.91 6.91
11th Ohio Valley 0.1532 33.10 17.78 31.10 52.82 5.79 7.37
12th Ky. Wesleyan 0.1454 30.80 16.26 28.84 53.03 5.26 7.45
13th Ohio Dominican 0.1401 31.85 17.84 29.62 53.73 5.31 7.16
14th Ohio Dominican 0.1401 31.85 17.84 29.62 53.73 5.31 7.16
15th Davis & Elkins 0.1275 30.73 17.97 28.40 57.98 4.98 7.38
16th Ursuline 0.1268 30.03 17.36 27.72 57.58 5.28 7.71
17th Alderson Broaddus 0.1032 28.87 18.55 27.57 57.41 5.89 8.21
18th Trevecca Nazarene 0.0910 27.37 18.26 24.88 59.95 4.77 6.07

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Hillsdale 0.1313 28.24 15.11 26.23 58.66 4.60 4.33
2nd Hillsdale 0.1313 28.24 15.11 26.23 58.66 4.60 4.33
3rd Findlay 0.1392 30.57 16.65 29.51 55.73 4.80 4.91
4th Findlay 0.1392 30.57 16.65 29.51 55.73 4.80 4.91
5th Lake Erie 0.1544 31.14 15.70 29.91 56.71 5.38 4.92
6th Lake Erie 0.1544 31.14 15.70 29.91 56.71 5.38 4.92
7th Cedarville 0.1553 31.57 16.04 29.40 52.88 6.88 5.10
8th Malone 0.1705 32.78 15.73 30.38 51.86 5.41 6.31
9th Walsh 0.1790 33.24 15.34 30.84 54.90 4.62 5.23
10th Walsh 0.1790 33.24 15.34 30.84 54.90 4.62 5.23
11th Ky. Wesleyan 0.1935 34.74 15.39 32.54 50.76 4.45 6.34
12th Davis & Elkins 0.2231 37.91 15.60 35.65 46.31 6.00 6.38
13th Ohio Dominican 0.2256 36.32 13.76 33.52 50.53 4.04 7.88
14th Ohio Dominican 0.2256 36.32 13.76 33.52 50.53 4.04 7.88
15th Trevecca Nazarene 0.2277 37.29 14.52 34.37 49.76 4.22 8.56
16th Ohio Valley 0.2314 38.10 14.96 35.32 47.89 4.41 9.15
17th Ursuline 0.2315 36.13 12.98 32.35 50.58 3.55 8.91
18th Alderson Broaddus 0.2404 37.71 13.67 34.06 50.92 3.21 6.94

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,402.6391 1,400.5935 1,397.8192 1,396.1863 1,399.3095
Difference -2.0456 -4.8198 -6.4528 -4.4394

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Cedarville 127 2,800 1,281 215 229 45.75 13.0 12.2 2,733 1,216 160 231 55.51 17.1 11.8
Malone 118 2,489 1,130 179 203 45.40 13.9 12.3 2,485 1,116 172 187 55.09 14.4 13.3
Ky. Wesleyan 107 2,165 937 172 226 43.28 12.6 9.6 2,355 1,129 164 187 52.06 14.4 12.6
Ohio Valley 104 2,111 909 163 202 43.06 13.0 10.5 2,321 1,136 224 187 51.06 10.4 12.4
Alderson Broaddus 108 1,904 829 183 189 43.54 10.4 10.1 2,143 1,079 177 193 49.65 12.1 11.1
Davis & Elkins 107 2,054 861 158 193 41.92 13.0 10.6 2,361 1,178 162 174 50.11 14.6 13.6
Ursuline 102 1,537 664 165 191 43.20 9.3 8.0 1,761 910 209 183 48.33 8.4 9.6
Trevecca Nazarene 97 1,809 727 109 129 40.19 16.6 14.0 2,225 1,171 207 215 47.37 10.7 10.3
Conference Average 109 2,109 917 168 195 43.29 12.7 10.9 2,298 1,117 184 195 51.15 12.8 11.8
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the G-MAC

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

65.39

2017-09-16 Owensboro, KY
Ky. Wesleyan
Malone
2
3
22
25
25
20
25
18
25
27
9
15
GAME

64.62

2017-10-07 Cedarville, OH
Cedarville
Malone
3
1
25
27
25
23
25
15
25
21
GAME

64.52

2017-11-10 Ownesboro, KY
Ky. Wesleyan
Cedarville
3
1
28
26
25
12
21
25
25
23
GAME

64.28

2017-09-21 Elkins, W.Va.
Davis & Elkins
Malone
2
3
28
26
27
29
26
24
17
25
12
15
GAME

64.07

2017-09-22 Philippi, WV
Alderson Broaddus
Malone
1
3
25
21
19
25
22
25
22
25
GAME

63.78

2017-09-30 Cedarville, OH
Cedarville
Ky. Wesleyan
1
3
16
25
20
25
26
24
22
25
GAME

63.38

2017-10-19 Philippi, WV
Alderson Broaddus
Cedarville
2
3
14
25
25
23
26
24
23
25
11
15
GAME

63.26

2017-09-23 Cedarville, OH
Cedarville
Ursuline
3
0
26
24
25
14
27
25
GAME

61.83

2017-11-11 Nashville, Tenn.
Trevecca Nazarene
Cedarville
2
3
25
23
25
18
16
25
14
25
10
15
GAME

61.64

2017-11-10 Elkins, W.Va.
Davis & Elkins
Ohio Valley
3
1
25
21
25
23
24
26
25
17

HuskerGeek G-MAC All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 23.3554
2 21.0564
3 17.7549
4 17.5333
5 16.5865
6 15.0423
7 13.5873
8 13.4023
9 12.9415
10 12.6938

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 17.0242
2 10.2069
3 9.8335
4 8.4711
5 7.9520
6 7.9381
7 7.8306
8 7.5220
9 7.3128
10 6.8830

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 15.7265
2 13.1044
3 12.1904
4 10.6503
5 10.4337
6 9.6629
7 9.5124
8 9.0949
9 9.0722
10 8.3895

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.1839
2 0.1765
3 0.1658
4 0.1583
5 0.1525
6 0.1480
7 0.1440
8 0.1327
9 0.1306
10 0.1306

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1340
2 0.1011
3 0.0950
4 0.0911
5 0.0824
6 0.0763
7 0.0723
8 0.0667
9 0.0656
10 0.0643

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1311
2 0.1106
3 0.1060
4 0.1043
5 0.1032
6 0.1014
7 0.1001
8 0.0938
9 0.0926
10 0.0924


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek