Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

G-MAC - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 2
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Hillsdale 1,651.3393 1,616.6268 1,633.8909 59.03 60.52 0.180
2nd Tiffin 1,575.4444 1,535.8476 1,555.5200 54.01 55.37 0.079
3rd Walsh 1,527.9393 1,498.1856 1,512.9893 48.26 58.89 0.078
4th Ky. Wesleyan 1,497.0283 1,457.3396 1,477.0507 53.76 50.82 0.029
5th Cedarville 1,489.3088 1,457.9535 1,473.5478 52.31 52.59 0.025
6th Malone 1,490.4355 1,454.5101 1,472.3632 51.60 52.74 0.037
7th Trevecca Nazarene 1,482.4447 1,446.3219 1,464.2719 53.22 50.34 0.033
8th Findlay 1,470.3598 1,435.7680 1,452.9610 48.65 53.41 0.029
9th Lake Erie 1,418.5182 1,382.1126 1,400.1971 45.62 51.57 -0.049
10th Ursuline 1,407.4153 1,371.0642 1,389.1208 50.09 46.19 -0.069
11th Ohio Dominican 1,387.7782 1,357.6589 1,372.6359 46.67 46.98 -0.067
12th Ohio Valley 1,384.9086 1,350.0900 1,367.3885 44.88 49.73 -0.052
13th Alderson Broaddus 1,363.4394 1,329.3922 1,346.3082 42.31 48.92 -0.089

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Hillsdale 0.2749 38.51 11.02 35.28 46.99 3.82 7.91
2nd Walsh 0.2517 38.69 13.52 34.59 48.12 3.96 6.52
3rd Tiffin 0.2393 35.89 11.97 33.02 51.71 4.17 7.21
4th Findlay 0.2140 35.45 14.05 31.68 48.96 4.54 7.48
5th Malone 0.2126 34.89 13.63 31.80 51.98 4.16 7.21
6th Trevecca Nazarene 0.2066 34.84 14.18 30.94 52.09 4.24 7.60
7th Ky. Wesleyan 0.1892 32.44 13.52 29.83 53.59 4.95 8.50
8th Ohio Valley 0.1868 34.81 16.12 32.22 52.07 5.77 6.69
9th Cedarville 0.1840 35.16 16.76 33.35 49.88 5.22 9.43
10th Lake Erie 0.1707 32.34 15.27 29.44 53.37 4.41 6.40
11th Ursuline 0.1569 31.25 15.56 29.22 54.05 5.33 7.80
12th Alderson Broaddus 0.1416 32.77 18.60 30.44 52.24 5.49 6.15
13th Ohio Dominican 0.1406 32.37 18.30 29.71 55.11 5.17 7.32

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Hillsdale 0.0954 25.74 16.20 24.11 59.92 6.21 4.39
2nd Cedarville 0.1585 31.13 15.28 29.46 54.73 5.62 7.32
3rd Tiffin 0.1599 30.29 14.31 28.34 55.52 4.76 4.23
4th Ky. Wesleyan 0.1605 30.36 14.32 28.83 56.64 4.98 7.45
5th Trevecca Nazarene 0.1741 32.83 15.42 30.01 52.66 4.96 8.58
6th Walsh 0.1742 32.04 14.62 29.61 54.87 4.41 6.08
7th Malone 0.1751 31.90 14.39 30.00 54.69 3.82 7.28
8th Findlay 0.1854 33.34 14.80 30.50 51.75 5.42 7.69
9th Ohio Dominican 0.2073 35.86 15.13 32.75 50.65 4.59 8.60
10th Lake Erie 0.2195 35.39 13.43 32.28 49.04 4.04 7.06
11th Ursuline 0.2260 36.04 13.44 33.38 50.71 3.67 7.73
12th Alderson Broaddus 0.2309 37.47 14.38 33.93 48.70 4.21 8.35
13th Ohio Valley 0.2392 39.19 15.27 35.57 47.55 5.34 10.15

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,455.2496 1,448.9133 1,446.1264 1,447.0732 1,449.3406
Difference -6.3363 -9.1232 -8.1764 -7.8787

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Hillsdale 118 2,659 1,481 190 131 55.70 14.0 20.3 2,199 990 102 142 54.98 21.6 15.5
Walsh 103 2,341 1,132 147 255 48.36 15.9 9.2 2,182 977 136 237 55.23 16.0 9.2
Tiffin 114 2,460 1,281 166 141 52.07 14.8 17.4 2,236 1,088 92 166 51.34 24.3 13.5
Ky. Wesleyan 103 2,203 1,215 193 222 55.15 11.4 9.9 2,124 1,114 153 200 47.55 13.9 10.6
Trevecca Nazarene 119 2,409 1,296 198 258 53.80 12.2 9.3 2,367 1,248 210 199 47.28 11.3 11.9
Ohio Valley 88 1,751 893 163 144 51.00 10.7 12.2 1,734 874 172 157 49.60 10.1 11.0
Cedarville 100 2,191 1,117 198 234 50.98 11.1 9.4 2,178 1,104 154 176 49.31 14.1 12.4
Malone 123 2,500 1,259 171 234 50.36 14.6 10.7 2,556 1,313 195 235 48.63 13.1 10.9
Alderson Broaddus 110 2,238 1,061 165 230 47.41 13.6 9.7 2,329 1,163 196 215 50.06 11.9 10.8
Lake Erie 117 2,357 1,111 152 155 47.14 15.5 15.2 2,489 1,246 189 251 49.94 13.2 9.9
Findlay 101 2,095 983 137 250 46.92 15.3 8.4 2,309 1,192 182 161 48.38 12.7 14.3
Ursuline 97 1,856 926 144 132 49.89 12.9 14.1 2,134 1,211 168 206 43.25 12.7 10.4
Ohio Dominican 101 1,879 848 132 202 45.13 14.2 9.3 2,270 1,275 194 205 43.83 11.7 11.1
Conference Average 107 2,226 1,123 166 199 50.30 13.6 11.9 2,239 1,138 165 196 49.18 14.3 11.7
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the G-MAC

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

75.61

2019-11-19 Hillsdale, MI
Hillsdale
Malone
3
1
28
26
25
19
23
25
25
21
GAME

75.04

2019-11-08
Tiffin
Trevecca Nazarene
2
3
25
22
25
17
21
25
21
25
9
15
GAME

71.93

2019-11-19
Tiffin
Findlay
3
1
25
18
20
25
25
18
25
18
GAME

71.79

2019-11-19 TBA, TBA
Walsh
Trevecca Nazarene
3
2
25
16
23
25
25
18
19
25
15
12
GAME

71.64

2019-11-09 Hillsdale, MI
Hillsdale
Malone
3
1
25
22
20
25
25
20
25
19
GAME

70.13

2019-11-22 Hillsdale, MI
Tiffin
Walsh
3
1
25
19
23
25
25
12
25
20
GAME

69.63

2019-10-11
Tiffin
Hillsdale
0
3
8
25
15
25
16
25
GAME

69.18

2019-09-28
Ursuline
Tiffin
2
3
25
20
13
25
19
25
26
24
11
15
GAME

69.15

2019-10-04
Ky. Wesleyan
Malone
3
1
23
25
25
23
25
20
25
23
GAME

69.11

2019-10-05
Ky. Wesleyan
Walsh
1
3
25
27
15
25
25
21
19
25

HuskerGeek G-MAC All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 30.9756
2 25.3955
3 23.7660
4 21.2676
5 20.0274
6 19.6176
7 18.3873
8 18.3175
9 17.9662
10 17.9419

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 19.4125
2 15.4540
3 14.5898
4 13.4277
5 12.9944
6 11.4991
7 11.4433
8 11.2966
9 10.0006
10 9.8189

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 17.7289
2 16.3968
3 16.3264
4 13.6993
5 12.8684
6 12.4694
7 11.8467
8 11.6013
9 11.5631
10 11.3367

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2895
2 0.2330
3 0.2127
4 0.2067
5 0.2022
6 0.1978
7 0.1850
8 0.1831
9 0.1821
10 0.1803

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1814
2 0.1504
3 0.1418
4 0.1299
5 0.1271
6 0.1221
7 0.1162
8 0.1064
9 0.0982
10 0.0963

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1666
2 0.1555
3 0.1532
4 0.1532
5 0.1372
6 0.1302
7 0.1300
8 0.1263
9 0.1251
10 0.1223


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek