Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

G-MAC - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 2
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Hillsdale 1,653.1562 1,650.7470 1,651.9511 66.18 60.36 0.284
2nd Walsh 1,593.2967 1,593.1785 1,593.2376 62.63 63.09 0.234
3rd Tiffin 1,549.6220 1,547.4919 1,548.5566 59.33 58.74 0.170
4th Findlay 1,534.1653 1,532.3220 1,533.2434 57.86 60.32 0.189
5th Cedarville 1,531.3923 1,527.9049 1,529.6476 57.93 56.50 0.204
6th Ohio Dominican 1,506.7191 1,505.3000 1,506.0093 61.60 54.80 0.172
7th Ursuline 1,491.1122 1,489.0647 1,490.0881 58.66 56.52 0.131
8th Trevecca Nazarene 1,459.0295 1,456.5384 1,457.7834 58.77 56.72 0.134
9th Malone 1,389.1837 1,388.1427 1,388.6631 55.67 52.70 0.046
10th Ky. Wesleyan 1,387.7881 1,385.5582 1,386.6727 56.83 50.39 0.010
11th Lake Erie 1,318.1240 1,316.1404 1,317.1318 54.45 47.31 -0.013
12th Ohio Valley 1,252.1297 1,247.5099 1,249.8177 52.00 47.55 -0.081

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Hillsdale 0.4062 41.41 0.79 38.48 45.08 3.07 7.81
2nd Walsh 0.3929 39.30 0.01 34.59 43.13 4.35 5.57
3rd Cedarville 0.3751 40.91 3.40 37.52 44.47 3.73 5.80
4th Findlay 0.3631 38.68 2.38 34.61 40.09 4.04 7.56
5th Ursuline 0.3371 37.09 3.38 34.73 48.31 4.18 5.26
6th Trevecca Nazarene 0.3334 38.19 4.85 34.03 43.85 4.22 6.43
7th Ohio Dominican 0.3184 36.54 4.70 33.14 48.76 3.97 5.58
8th Tiffin 0.3093 34.14 3.21 31.23 51.78 3.36 4.77
9th Malone 0.2849 33.48 4.98 30.64 49.85 5.30 6.63
10th Lake Erie 0.2484 31.27 6.43 28.51 52.18 4.95 6.14
11th Ohio Valley 0.2369 28.82 5.12 26.84 57.11 4.74 9.19
12th Ky. Wesleyan 0.2124 31.93 10.69 29.62 48.38 7.25 7.05

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Hillsdale 0.1225 24.37 12.12 22.74 62.00 6.36 6.18
2nd Tiffin 0.1388 25.85 11.97 24.20 60.25 5.85 5.18
3rd Ohio Dominican 0.1462 27.30 12.69 24.90 61.63 5.61 7.80
4th Walsh 0.1588 26.37 10.49 23.52 56.09 5.19 5.22
5th Cedarville 0.1712 28.08 10.97 25.92 58.23 6.68 7.48
6th Findlay 0.1740 28.64 11.25 25.15 55.71 6.68 7.25
7th Trevecca Nazarene 0.1995 30.95 11.00 28.00 53.56 4.64 7.94
8th Ky. Wesleyan 0.2026 30.87 10.61 29.52 53.36 4.88 7.65
9th Ursuline 0.2066 31.06 10.40 29.85 57.43 4.25 7.29
10th Malone 0.2394 34.34 10.41 31.88 53.30 3.58 10.21
11th Lake Erie 0.2611 35.51 9.40 31.63 50.64 4.70 9.79
12th Ohio Valley 0.3179 37.42 5.62 34.11 52.25 2.99 12.20

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,471.0669 1,475.1034 1,480.0830 1,484.2391 1,477.6231
Difference 4.0365 9.0162 13.1723 8.7416

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Hillsdale 57 1,293 774 107 39 59.86 12.1 33.2 1,023 501 61 82 51.03 16.8 12.5
Walsh 43 945 536 62 69 56.72 15.2 13.7 810 374 37 82 53.83 21.9 9.9
Findlay 45 1,037 546 83 109 52.65 12.5 9.5 944 458 58 64 51.48 16.3 14.8
Ohio Dominican 43 925 523 57 81 56.54 16.2 11.4 886 477 61 71 46.16 14.5 12.5
Tiffin 51 1,029 545 58 59 52.96 17.7 17.4 977 499 49 75 48.93 19.9 13.0
Ursuline 44 804 431 56 49 53.61 14.4 16.4 781 409 63 74 47.63 12.4 10.6
Trevecca Nazarene 51 1,106 594 74 115 53.71 14.9 9.6 1,125 599 85 74 46.76 13.2 15.2
Cedarville 48 1,085 567 67 85 52.26 16.2 12.8 1,024 551 68 60 46.19 15.1 17.1
Malone 40 791 402 57 60 50.82 13.9 13.2 911 511 85 69 43.91 10.7 13.2
Ky. Wesleyan 40 817 424 66 85 51.90 12.4 9.6 934 543 64 80 41.86 14.6 11.7
Lake Erie 36 664 328 47 56 49.40 14.1 11.9 839 516 76 61 38.50 11.0 13.8
Ohio Valley 37 589 278 60 55 47.20 9.8 10.7 796 486 97 73 38.95 8.2 10.9
Conference Average 45 924 496 66 72 53.14 14.1 14.1 921 494 67 72 46.27 14.6 12.9
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the G-MAC

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

76.82

2021-01-30
Walsh
Hillsdale
1
3
29
27
20
25
17
25
15
25
GAME

76.15

2021-02-17
Tiffin
Cedarville
1
3
18
25
28
26
27
29
19
25
GAME

74.96

2021-03-12
Hillsdale
Cedarville
3
2
20
25
25
15
21
25
25
23
15
13
GAME

74.67

2021-03-09
Findlay
Tiffin
1
3
18
25
25
22
21
25
22
25
GAME

74.19

2021-03-13
Hillsdale
Tiffin
3
1
22
25
25
14
25
15
25
22
GAME

73.82

2021-01-29
Ursuline
Cedarville
2
3
25
18
25
27
28
26
22
25
11
15
GAME

73.46

2021-03-05
Ursuline
Walsh
1
3
23
25
25
18
22
25
22
25
GAME

71.85

2021-01-29
Walsh
Findlay
3
1
28
26
25
27
25
11
25
19
GAME

71.44

2021-03-02
Ohio Dominican
Tiffin
3
2
25
23
25
17
12
25
22
25
15
13
GAME

71.33

2021-02-05
Tiffin
Walsh
0
3
22
25
23
25
18
25

HuskerGeek G-MAC All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 14.2532
2 11.8378
3 10.3783
4 10.2966
5 9.6306
6 9.4060
7 9.3267
8 7.9012
9 6.9803
10 6.7728

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 8.0920
2 6.9010
3 6.7259
4 6.2659
5 5.4029
6 4.9860
7 4.8679
8 4.8077
9 4.6846
10 4.5676

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 8.8764
2 7.7037
3 6.1613
4 5.9848
5 5.7136
6 5.3668
7 5.2641
8 5.0454
9 4.9368
10 4.8701

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2689
2 0.2613
3 0.2573
4 0.2288
5 0.2026
6 0.2006
7 0.1968
8 0.1944
9 0.1933
10 0.1924

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1527
2 0.1501
3 0.1500
4 0.1495
5 0.1339
6 0.1229
7 0.1215
8 0.1148
9 0.1093
10 0.1041

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1975
2 0.1731
3 0.1644
4 0.1425
5 0.1350
6 0.1294
7 0.1195
8 0.1193
9 0.1190
10 0.1163


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek