Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

GAC - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 2
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Harding 1,549.8622 1,510.6235 1,530.1171 51.75 63.02 0.133
2nd Arkansas Tech 1,488.0196 1,471.1479 1,479.5597 47.55 60.96 0.066
3rd Southern Nazarene 1,470.9170 1,444.8463 1,457.8234 46.26 61.05 0.083
4th Southwestern Okla. 1,421.0163 1,396.9945 1,408.9542 44.79 56.08 0.011
5th Southeastern Okla. 1,414.7335 1,391.1428 1,402.8885 44.43 56.94 0.016
6th East Central 1,404.8365 1,381.7164 1,393.2285 43.37 56.84 0.034
7th Ouachita Baptist 1,398.7873 1,364.3721 1,381.4725 43.30 56.10 -0.005
8th Southern Ark. 1,379.6542 1,355.8331 1,367.6918 41.29 55.52 -0.021
9th Northwestern Okla. 1,346.4470 1,338.9071 1,342.6717 41.15 53.64 -0.043
10th Ark.-Monticello 1,349.2552 1,313.5722 1,331.2941 42.97 51.51 -0.058
11th Henderson St. 1,249.6812 1,233.7668 1,241.6985 37.47 45.73 -0.167

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Harding 0.2389 38.03 14.14 34.91 47.48 5.00 7.23
2nd Arkansas Tech 0.2292 38.21 15.29 34.42 45.33 5.05 9.21
3rd Southern Nazarene 0.2265 34.74 12.09 32.33 52.56 3.82 6.01
4th Southwestern Okla. 0.1904 33.86 14.83 31.45 52.24 4.97 6.93
5th Southern Ark. 0.1897 34.60 15.63 31.59 51.95 5.60 7.65
6th East Central 0.1888 34.84 15.95 32.24 49.77 5.52 5.63
7th Southeastern Okla. 0.1853 33.26 14.73 30.00 54.88 3.98 7.99
8th Northwestern Okla. 0.1676 31.96 15.21 29.50 52.98 5.27 7.84
9th Ouachita Baptist 0.1666 30.14 13.48 27.53 56.12 3.52 4.94
10th Ark.-Monticello 0.1234 29.92 17.58 27.67 52.71 5.33 6.42
11th Henderson St. 0.0979 29.02 19.24 26.78 58.62 6.37 5.73

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Harding 0.1056 27.41 16.85 25.12 57.52 5.61 4.15
2nd Southern Nazarene 0.1438 31.65 17.28 29.47 51.96 6.43 3.90
3rd East Central 0.1551 32.87 17.36 30.59 50.55 6.46 6.79
4th Arkansas Tech 0.1627 31.09 14.82 27.77 54.04 4.27 5.07
5th Southeastern Okla. 0.1696 32.63 15.67 30.52 54.10 5.19 5.60
6th Ouachita Baptist 0.1719 32.66 15.47 30.12 51.84 4.44 5.40
7th Southwestern Okla. 0.1797 33.70 15.73 31.40 50.97 5.80 6.02
8th Ark.-Monticello 0.1815 35.21 17.05 32.29 47.33 6.29 7.59
9th Northwestern Okla. 0.2102 35.96 14.94 33.34 51.43 3.57 6.98
10th Southern Ark. 0.2104 36.41 15.37 34.13 49.96 4.74 6.51
11th Henderson St. 0.2652 41.88 15.36 39.23 41.68 5.85 10.30

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,394.3091 1,396.1761 1,393.5330 1,390.8471 1,393.7163
Difference 1.8670 -0.7761 -3.4620 -0.7904

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Harding 127 2,868 1,399 186 189 48.78 15.4 15.2 2,527 1,033 124 195 59.12 20.4 13.0
Arkansas Tech 110 2,438 1,144 219 254 46.92 11.1 9.6 2,233 934 123 179 58.17 18.2 12.5
Southern Nazarene 120 2,605 1,169 144 230 44.88 18.1 11.3 2,468 1,019 111 192 58.71 22.2 12.9
Ouachita Baptist 106 2,238 979 114 144 43.74 19.6 15.5 2,275 1,018 136 192 55.25 16.7 11.8
Southeastern Okla. 110 2,324 990 174 244 42.60 13.4 9.5 2,435 1,115 147 164 54.21 16.6 14.8
Southern Ark. 100 2,114 885 159 187 41.86 13.3 11.3 2,260 1,033 159 184 54.29 14.2 12.3
Southwestern Okla. 120 2,545 1,087 155 179 42.71 16.4 14.2 2,717 1,265 175 215 53.44 15.5 12.6
East Central 100 2,063 859 101 197 41.64 20.4 10.5 2,200 1,010 163 146 54.09 13.5 15.1
Ark.-Monticello 104 2,068 921 154 158 44.54 13.4 13.1 2,217 1,091 183 217 50.79 12.1 10.2
Northwestern Okla. 115 2,337 945 173 262 40.44 13.5 8.9 2,615 1,251 192 211 52.16 13.6 12.4
Henderson St. 94 1,471 576 109 138 39.16 13.5 10.7 1,944 1,069 233 168 45.01 8.3 11.6
Conference Average 110 2,279 996 153 198 43.39 15.3 11.8 2,354 1,076 159 188 54.11 15.6 12.7
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the GAC

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

69.93

2013-11-14 Ada, Okla.
East Central
Southern Nazarene
2
3
25
23
23
25
12
25
27
25
11
15
GAME

69.75

2013-11-22 Hot Springs, Ark.
Harding
Ouachita Baptist
3
2
25
13
25
18
26
28
22
25
15
10
GAME

69.52

2013-10-01 Bethany, OK
Southern Nazarene
Southwestern Okla.
3
1
25
23
25
23
21
25
26
24
GAME

69.28

2013-10-24 Bethany, OK
Southern Nazarene
Harding
2
3
21
25
25
20
25
15
19
25
13
15
GAME

68.18

2013-10-22 Bethany, OK
Southern Nazarene
East Central
3
2
23
25
23
25
25
23
29
27
15
8
GAME

68.10

2013-10-19 Weatherford, Okla.
Southwestern Okla.
Ouachita Baptist
2
3
25
20
25
19
22
25
22
25
14
16
GAME

68.08

2013-11-14 Magnolia, Ark.
Southern Ark.
Arkansas Tech
3
2
26
24
20
25
23
25
25
14
16
14
GAME

67.22

2013-10-08 Magnolia, Ark.
Southern Ark.
Ouachita Baptist
3
1
25
23
22
25
25
20
25
23
GAME

67.12

2013-09-17 Bethany, OK
Southern Nazarene
Southeastern Okla.
3
1
22
25
25
12
25
21
25
20
GAME

66.82

2013-09-24 Russellville, Ark.
Arkansas Tech
Harding
0
3
24
26
18
25
17
25

HuskerGeek GAC All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 27.5621
2 25.9009
3 24.0084
4 23.8406
5 22.4538
6 19.4035
7 18.5813
8 17.8038
9 17.7327
10 17.0494

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 18.0479
2 14.7273
3 14.0334
4 13.1618
5 12.5718
6 12.3826
7 10.5506
8 10.3609
9 10.1348
10 9.7219

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 18.1456
2 15.7525
3 15.4317
4 14.8190
5 14.6035
6 13.5287
7 13.4797
8 13.4277
9 12.2035
10 11.1702

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2187
2 0.2106
3 0.2056
4 0.2038
5 0.1919
6 0.1729
7 0.1720
8 0.1689
9 0.1682
10 0.1680

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1432
2 0.1292
3 0.1221
4 0.1126
5 0.1125
6 0.1114
7 0.1074
8 0.0989
9 0.0886
10 0.0856

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1715
2 0.1445
3 0.1429
4 0.1378
5 0.1347
6 0.1152
7 0.1119
8 0.1109
9 0.1074
10 0.0997


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek