Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

GAC - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 2
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Arkansas Tech 1,497.3700 1,491.8971 1,494.6310 46.63 61.19 0.075
2nd Harding 1,504.9051 1,482.0555 1,493.4366 46.99 61.07 0.079
3rd Southern Nazarene 1,487.2711 1,477.0244 1,482.1389 47.88 57.11 0.055
4th Southeastern Okla. 1,444.9072 1,434.3467 1,439.6173 44.77 57.62 0.018
5th Northwestern Okla. 1,439.8347 1,425.0417 1,432.4191 43.97 56.71 0.019
6th Ouachita Baptist 1,398.3496 1,384.0339 1,391.1734 44.03 53.03 -0.008
7th Southern Ark. 1,390.5396 1,381.9627 1,386.2445 41.33 55.49 -0.007
8th Ark.-Monticello 1,371.8403 1,353.4522 1,362.6152 44.14 51.48 -0.025
9th Southwestern Okla. 1,363.6941 1,356.0307 1,359.8570 41.87 52.04 -0.048
10th East Central 1,333.1582 1,328.4574 1,330.8057 39.93 50.53 -0.085
11th Henderson St. 1,286.4726 1,302.7114 1,294.5665 36.40 50.18 -0.114

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Arkansas Tech 0.2386 38.49 14.63 35.99 46.33 4.76 7.13
2nd Harding 0.2285 36.01 13.17 32.90 50.81 5.03 7.21
3rd Southeastern Okla. 0.2084 34.75 13.91 31.75 52.58 4.44 6.44
4th Southern Nazarene 0.1946 33.79 14.33 31.28 53.33 3.68 6.32
5th Southern Ark. 0.1898 34.47 15.49 32.10 50.63 5.46 6.64
6th Ouachita Baptist 0.1745 30.95 13.50 27.95 57.63 4.05 4.35
7th Northwestern Okla. 0.1699 31.84 14.85 29.12 55.10 4.51 5.87
8th Southwestern Okla. 0.1390 29.46 15.56 27.23 59.19 4.64 5.32
9th Henderson St. 0.1298 30.06 17.08 28.34 56.88 5.14 6.13
10th Ark.-Monticello 0.1272 28.35 15.63 25.70 57.56 4.35 5.14
11th East Central 0.1234 30.71 18.37 28.58 54.70 5.59 6.24

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Southern Nazarene 0.1400 30.42 16.41 28.43 52.71 6.23 5.44
2nd Harding 0.1496 30.24 15.28 28.26 55.28 5.50 6.40
3rd Northwestern Okla. 0.1510 31.90 16.80 30.18 53.76 5.71 5.70
4th Ark.-Monticello 0.1523 31.88 16.65 29.98 52.47 5.49 5.65
5th Arkansas Tech 0.1640 31.97 15.57 29.33 52.20 5.01 4.46
6th Ouachita Baptist 0.1827 33.03 14.75 30.76 52.79 4.65 6.39
7th Southwestern Okla. 0.1874 33.37 14.63 31.50 52.92 5.62 6.67
8th Southeastern Okla. 0.1903 33.57 14.54 30.75 52.09 5.18 4.92
9th Southern Ark. 0.1968 35.30 15.62 32.73 49.34 5.52 6.37
10th East Central 0.2084 36.35 15.51 33.31 50.24 5.02 6.79
11th Henderson St. 0.2441 39.76 15.35 36.64 45.83 4.95 6.88

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,406.1368 1,408.7009 1,407.7236 1,402.4139 1,406.2438
Difference 2.5640 1.5868 -3.7230 0.1426

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Arkansas Tech 113 2,559 1,214 177 214 47.44 14.5 12.0 2,280 918 96 142 59.74 23.8 16.1
Harding 104 2,339 1,085 155 164 46.39 15.1 14.3 2,145 875 138 157 59.21 15.5 13.7
Southern Nazarene 102 2,240 1,069 128 144 47.72 17.5 15.6 2,144 957 114 126 55.36 18.8 17.0
Northwestern Okla. 94 2,075 958 121 150 46.17 17.1 13.8 2,017 897 115 137 55.53 17.5 14.7
Southeastern Okla. 119 2,557 1,148 157 170 44.90 16.3 15.0 2,523 1,113 120 158 55.89 21.0 16.0
Ouachita Baptist 90 1,900 865 85 101 45.53 22.4 18.8 1,934 902 127 152 53.36 15.2 12.7
Ark.-Monticello 95 1,980 923 111 124 46.62 17.8 16.0 2,043 994 112 159 51.35 18.2 12.8
Southern Ark. 103 2,163 904 137 201 41.79 15.8 10.8 2,311 1,060 142 146 54.13 16.3 15.8
Southwestern Okla. 97 1,942 828 96 145 42.64 20.2 13.4 2,177 1,082 145 154 50.30 15.0 14.1
East Central 95 1,855 746 110 150 40.22 16.9 12.4 2,193 1,111 147 147 49.34 14.9 14.9
Henderson St. 100 1,950 753 123 184 38.62 15.9 10.6 2,335 1,160 159 165 50.32 14.7 14.2
Conference Average 101 2,142 954 127 159 44.37 17.2 13.9 2,191 1,006 129 149 54.05 17.4 14.7
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the GAC

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

71.91

2014-09-23 Russellville, AR
Arkansas Tech
Harding
3
2
25
23
25
19
23
25
15
25
15
13
GAME

70.59

2014-11-14 Hot Springs, Ark.
Arkansas Tech
Harding
3
1
25
18
21
25
25
21
25
23
GAME

70.21

2014-10-07 Durant, OK
Southeastern Okla.
Southern Nazarene
3
2
25
22
25
22
22
25
21
25
15
13
GAME

70.19

2014-10-03 Durant, OK
Southeastern Okla.
Arkansas Tech
1
3
21
25
26
24
23
25
28
30
GAME

70.16

2014-11-15 Hot Springs, AR
Arkansas Tech
Southern Nazarene
3
2
25
18
19
25
17
25
25
23
15
13
GAME

69.77

2014-10-18 Alva, Okla.
Northwestern Okla.
Harding
1
3
25
23
21
25
14
25
15
25
GAME

69.70

2014-09-27 Searcy, Ark.
Harding
Southern Nazarene
3
0
25
17
25
16
29
27
GAME

69.65

2014-10-28 Searcy, Ark.
Harding
Arkansas Tech
2
3
25
15
23
25
11
25
25
21
10
15
GAME

69.35

2014-09-27 Monticello, AR
Ark.-Monticello
Southeastern Okla.
2
3
25
22
23
25
21
25
25
15
17
19
GAME

68.72

2014-11-06 Alva, Okla.
Northwestern Okla.
Southwestern Okla.
3
2
25
23
23
25
25
27
25
22
15
11

HuskerGeek GAC All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 25.3259
2 24.1845
3 21.7735
4 21.5828
5 20.7798
6 20.6931
7 20.1435
8 20.0339
9 18.4272
10 17.2750

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 16.5982
2 15.3308
3 14.6176
4 12.0095
5 11.9073
6 11.2055
7 10.8236
8 10.8122
9 10.4958
10 10.0302

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 18.7998
2 16.0211
3 14.6572
4 14.0136
5 13.5257
6 13.4473
7 13.3455
8 13.2673
9 13.1900
10 11.3647

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2493
2 0.2483
3 0.2077
4 0.1998
5 0.1976
6 0.1910
7 0.1831
8 0.1830
9 0.1773
10 0.1762

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1627
2 0.1580
3 0.1294
4 0.1258
5 0.1201
6 0.1116
7 0.1099
8 0.1069
9 0.1026
10 0.1009

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1664
2 0.1571
3 0.1517
4 0.1394
5 0.1361
6 0.1345
7 0.1276
8 0.1242
9 0.1222
10 0.1108


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek