Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

GAC - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 2
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Arkansas Tech 1,487.5115 1,503.9450 1,495.7057 47.05 61.71 0.066
2nd Okla. Baptist 1,476.8827 1,491.9754 1,484.4099 47.92 59.64 0.063
3rd Southwestern Okla. 1,437.3126 1,455.9758 1,446.6141 44.55 57.98 0.019
4th Harding 1,445.8801 1,445.5811 1,445.7306 46.61 58.35 0.056
5th Southern Nazarene 1,438.6766 1,447.8926 1,443.2773 44.81 57.55 0.026
6th Southern Ark. 1,432.1713 1,446.8734 1,439.5036 44.70 58.59 0.034
7th Ouachita Baptist 1,426.7666 1,428.6307 1,427.6983 42.89 58.90 0.016
8th Northwestern Okla. 1,405.5946 1,413.8191 1,409.7009 44.06 56.07 0.001
9th Southeastern Okla. 1,390.4096 1,396.5096 1,393.4563 44.51 53.44 0.000
10th Ark.-Monticello 1,351.7733 1,347.2748 1,349.5221 43.84 51.78 -0.056
11th East Central 1,327.6144 1,337.0331 1,332.3155 42.55 49.45 -0.065
12th Henderson St. 1,310.9252 1,315.7566 1,313.3387 39.38 48.93 -0.131

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Arkansas Tech 0.2331 38.15 14.83 35.21 47.96 4.58 6.83
2nd Southwestern Okla. 0.2201 34.84 12.83 32.30 52.85 5.08 6.62
3rd Ouachita Baptist 0.2168 35.00 13.32 32.66 51.02 5.59 4.83
4th Harding 0.2117 34.91 13.74 32.45 51.79 4.71 6.35
5th Southern Ark. 0.2071 35.33 14.62 33.42 50.18 5.45 6.48
6th Okla. Baptist 0.1995 33.37 13.42 31.08 55.89 4.69 6.19
7th Southeastern Okla. 0.1977 36.32 16.54 34.20 49.04 4.43 4.91
8th Northwestern Okla. 0.1866 34.58 15.92 31.73 50.19 4.78 7.26
9th Southern Nazarene 0.1828 33.76 15.47 30.92 53.46 4.78 7.13
10th Ark.-Monticello 0.1525 31.07 15.83 28.97 52.22 4.14 6.72
11th East Central 0.1290 31.38 18.48 29.01 54.21 5.79 6.14
12th Henderson St. 0.1063 30.30 19.68 28.20 53.81 6.58 6.63

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Okla. Baptist 0.1361 29.50 15.89 27.82 58.93 4.81 3.90
2nd Harding 0.1558 31.84 16.25 29.73 53.21 6.11 6.77
3rd Southern Nazarene 0.1563 30.34 14.71 28.37 55.84 5.05 5.64
4th Arkansas Tech 0.1676 31.77 15.02 29.83 54.28 4.60 3.47
5th Southern Ark. 0.1734 31.67 14.32 29.18 56.26 3.78 5.24
6th Northwestern Okla. 0.1851 32.88 14.37 30.42 52.81 4.79 4.94
7th East Central 0.1941 35.38 15.97 31.64 50.66 4.91 8.36
8th Southeastern Okla. 0.1980 34.80 14.99 32.29 51.67 4.56 8.03
9th Southwestern Okla. 0.2006 33.89 13.83 31.83 53.26 4.86 5.82
10th Ouachita Baptist 0.2008 35.06 14.98 33.24 50.87 4.54 6.03
11th Ark.-Monticello 0.2080 35.19 14.38 32.42 50.99 4.04 5.83
12th Henderson St. 0.2372 38.52 14.80 35.27 47.81 3.54 7.51

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,415.1061 1,417.2229 1,419.4379 1,426.5612 1,419.5820
Difference 2.1168 4.3318 11.4551 5.9679

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Arkansas Tech 102 2,393 1,115 155 185 46.59 15.4 12.9 2,152 864 75 163 59.85 28.7 13.2
Southern Ark. 126 2,771 1,259 177 181 45.44 15.7 15.3 2,650 1,134 149 216 57.21 17.8 12.3
Okla. Baptist 127 2,583 1,185 163 193 45.88 15.8 13.4 2,490 1,092 120 208 56.15 20.8 12.0
Ouachita Baptist 89 1,968 867 89 126 44.06 22.1 15.6 1,927 813 124 172 57.81 15.5 11.2
Harding 113 2,494 1,132 143 179 45.39 17.4 13.9 2,420 1,065 166 179 55.99 14.6 13.5
Southwestern Okla. 103 2,248 1,003 141 232 44.62 15.9 9.7 2,241 985 134 185 56.05 16.7 12.1
Southern Nazarene 124 2,698 1,204 182 278 44.63 14.8 9.7 2,681 1,191 151 203 55.58 17.8 13.2
Northwestern Okla. 106 2,293 1,023 168 211 44.61 13.6 10.9 2,313 1,054 122 185 54.43 19.0 12.5
Ark.-Monticello 97 1,871 853 134 164 45.59 14.0 11.4 1,958 954 116 141 51.28 16.9 13.9
Southeastern Okla. 105 2,168 950 98 143 43.82 22.1 15.2 2,359 1,155 200 172 51.04 11.8 13.7
East Central 95 1,849 781 106 150 42.24 17.4 12.3 2,198 1,150 197 167 47.68 11.2 13.2
Henderson St. 95 1,645 625 107 166 37.99 15.4 9.9 2,177 1,181 175 181 45.75 12.4 12.0
Conference Average 107 2,248 1,000 139 184 44.24 16.7 12.5 2,297 1,053 144 181 54.07 16.9 12.7
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the GAC

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

74.34

2015-11-03 Shawnee, Okla.
Okla. Baptist
Southwestern Okla.
3
2
25
22
27
25
22
25
23
25
15
6
GAME

71.05

2015-11-21 Hot Springs, Ark.
Southern Ark.
Southwestern Okla.
1
3
20
25
19
25
25
19
24
26
GAME

70.98

2015-11-19 Hot Springs, Ark.
Harding
Southern Ark.
2
3
25
13
22
25
25
21
22
25
13
15
GAME

70.56

2015-10-22 Shawnee, Okla.
Okla. Baptist
Arkansas Tech
0
3
28
30
22
25
21
25
GAME

70.53

2015-10-01 Weatherford, Okla.
Southwestern Okla.
Okla. Baptist
1
3
21
25
25
20
24
26
20
25
GAME

70.16

2015-11-10 Searcy, Ark.
Harding
Arkansas Tech
3
1
22
25
25
20
25
22
28
26
GAME

70.08

2015-11-05 Durant, OK
Southeastern Okla.
Southern Nazarene
2
3
18
25
28
26
25
23
24
26
9
15
GAME

69.93

2015-10-24 Alva, Okla.
Northwestern Okla.
Ouachita Baptist
3
2
25
17
25
27
21
25
31
29
15
6
GAME

69.53

2015-10-17 Magnolia, Ark.
Southern Ark.
Southern Nazarene
2
3
25
20
21
25
25
23
22
25
13
15
GAME

69.12

2015-11-19 Hot Springs, Ark.
Northwestern Okla.
Southwestern Okla.
1
3
25
22
21
25
18
25
21
25

HuskerGeek GAC All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 27.3727
2 26.4043
3 25.1703
4 23.1172
5 22.5512
6 22.1274
7 21.9119
8 21.8171
9 20.8871
10 19.8881

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 17.0731
2 16.8030
3 16.6069
4 15.7479
5 13.9786
6 13.3283
7 13.3210
8 12.1451
9 12.0512
10 11.9326

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 23.9935
2 23.2575
3 21.3399
4 16.1710
5 15.0196
6 14.4340
7 13.9266
8 13.8806
9 13.1081
10 11.6480

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2684
2 0.2200
3 0.2170
4 0.2148
5 0.2007
6 0.1912
7 0.1886
8 0.1881
9 0.1849
10 0.1841

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1647
2 0.1498
3 0.1423
4 0.1385
5 0.1323
6 0.1318
7 0.1306
8 0.1205
9 0.1168
10 0.1076

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.2068
2 0.1861
3 0.1721
4 0.1622
5 0.1585
6 0.1391
7 0.1361
8 0.1352
9 0.1340
10 0.1169


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek