Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

GAC - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 2
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Harding 1,601.5867 1,596.2183 1,598.9002 51.87 64.19 0.159
2nd Arkansas Tech 1,561.5851 1,551.8817 1,556.7258 50.15 60.98 0.100
3rd Southwestern Okla. 1,558.8151 1,545.1592 1,551.9721 50.34 60.02 0.076
4th Henderson St. 1,546.6321 1,530.0316 1,538.3095 47.87 62.22 0.076
5th Ouachita Baptist 1,521.6544 1,516.3152 1,518.9825 47.10 61.15 0.075
6th Okla. Baptist 1,498.8064 1,493.0718 1,495.9364 45.39 60.34 0.056
7th Southern Nazarene 1,481.6418 1,475.7661 1,478.7011 45.37 57.75 0.036
8th Northwestern Okla. 1,472.6474 1,464.8394 1,468.7382 45.45 56.68 0.029
9th Southeastern Okla. 1,418.1195 1,405.5404 1,411.8160 40.93 55.28 -0.048
10th Southern Ark. 1,401.1832 1,395.0718 1,398.1241 42.50 52.81 -0.040
11th Ark.-Monticello 1,394.3126 1,388.4622 1,391.3843 41.05 52.05 -0.067
12th East Central 1,350.0324 1,352.2404 1,351.1359 39.20 50.80 -0.104

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Harding 0.2748 37.62 10.13 35.01 50.75 4.01 6.51
2nd Ouachita Baptist 0.2489 36.78 11.90 35.11 51.16 4.31 5.45
3rd Arkansas Tech 0.2475 37.69 12.94 35.16 48.92 4.18 7.06
4th Henderson St. 0.2315 34.80 11.65 32.33 54.49 4.49 6.84
5th Southwestern Okla. 0.2259 33.61 11.02 30.93 55.66 3.39 8.18
6th Okla. Baptist 0.2173 34.22 12.50 31.74 54.45 3.93 7.46
7th Northwestern Okla. 0.2152 36.06 14.55 33.95 49.62 5.68 7.65
8th Southern Nazarene 0.2048 36.06 15.58 33.57 50.35 4.72 8.35
9th Southern Ark. 0.1606 33.16 17.10 30.79 53.73 4.96 6.63
10th Ark.-Monticello 0.1535 31.02 15.67 29.02 55.62 5.29 7.86
11th Southeastern Okla. 0.1469 32.43 17.75 30.65 53.08 5.37 7.47
12th East Central 0.1190 28.96 17.05 26.64 56.61 5.73 5.54

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Harding 0.1160 28.39 16.79 26.81 56.97 5.93 4.89
2nd Arkansas Tech 0.1476 30.77 16.01 28.38 55.16 5.57 5.13
3rd Southwestern Okla. 0.1496 30.00 15.04 28.20 56.97 3.93 5.14
4th Henderson St. 0.1551 30.70 15.19 28.76 55.46 6.41 5.07
5th Okla. Baptist 0.1618 30.71 14.53 29.26 57.40 5.07 4.64
6th Southern Nazarene 0.1688 32.06 15.18 30.03 54.39 3.96 6.87
7th Ouachita Baptist 0.1740 33.44 16.04 32.31 53.01 5.05 6.68
8th Northwestern Okla. 0.1857 33.90 15.34 31.42 51.65 5.17 5.54
9th Southeastern Okla. 0.1947 33.68 14.21 31.44 52.94 3.77 6.37
10th Southern Ark. 0.2008 35.14 15.06 33.01 50.02 5.27 6.87
11th Ark.-Monticello 0.2200 36.26 14.26 33.81 51.02 4.23 7.74
12th East Central 0.2230 37.11 14.81 33.84 47.85 3.85 6.72

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,480.0605 1,481.0690 1,482.8225 1,485.4139 1,482.3415
Difference 1.0085 2.7620 5.3534 3.0413

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Harding 129 2,900 1,400 165 164 48.28 17.6 17.7 2,549 1,021 137 169 59.95 18.6 15.1
Henderson St. 113 2,471 1,173 171 100 47.47 14.5 24.7 2,185 870 124 174 60.18 17.6 12.6
Ouachita Baptist 123 2,729 1,277 143 135 46.79 19.1 20.2 2,495 1,026 173 209 58.88 14.4 11.9
Southwestern Okla. 112 2,548 1,223 191 156 48.00 13.3 16.3 2,338 994 129 196 57.49 18.1 11.9
Arkansas Tech 98 2,245 1,058 139 173 47.13 16.2 13.0 2,088 895 114 158 57.14 18.3 13.2
Okla. Baptist 120 2,627 1,156 184 267 44.01 14.3 9.8 2,564 1,097 134 171 57.22 19.1 15.0
Northwestern Okla. 99 2,117 937 150 199 44.26 14.1 10.6 2,154 978 130 136 54.60 16.6 15.8
Southern Nazarene 121 2,597 1,136 197 290 43.74 13.2 9.0 2,673 1,205 197 196 54.92 13.6 13.6
Southeastern Okla. 103 2,027 804 139 194 39.67 14.6 10.4 2,286 1,081 157 181 52.71 14.6 12.6
Southern Ark. 97 1,956 808 122 149 41.31 16.0 13.1 2,242 1,110 161 170 50.49 13.9 13.2
Ark.-Monticello 108 2,093 812 147 240 38.80 14.2 8.7 2,533 1,287 204 228 49.19 12.4 11.1
East Central 97 1,798 665 87 100 36.99 20.7 18.0 2,298 1,204 171 184 47.61 13.4 12.5
Conference Average 110 2,342 1,037 153 181 43.87 15.6 14.3 2,367 1,064 153 181 55.03 15.9 13.2
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the GAC

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

81.22

2018-09-20 Arkadelphia, Ark.
Henderson St.
Ouachita Baptist
3
2
24
26
25
21
15
25
27
25
15
10
GAME

78.36

2018-11-09 Hot Springs, AR
Henderson St.
Southwestern Okla.
3
1
25
23
26
28
25
20
25
22
GAME

77.74

2018-11-10 Hot Springs, Ark.
Harding
Henderson St.
3
1
23
25
25
19
25
20
25
21
GAME

76.93

2018-09-29 Arkadelphia, Ark.
Ouachita Baptist
Okla. Baptist
3
2
22
25
26
24
29
27
20
25
15
6
GAME

76.51

2018-10-30 Russellville, AR
Arkansas Tech
Harding
2
3
25
23
21
25
25
22
21
25
7
15
GAME

76.41

2018-10-06 Weatherford, Okla.
Southwestern Okla.
Arkansas Tech
3
2
25
22
20
25
25
17
25
27
15
11
GAME

75.22

2018-10-05 Weatherford, Okla.
Southwestern Okla.
Harding
3
1
25
23
25
18
23
25
25
20
GAME

74.86

2018-11-08 Hot Springs, AR
Harding
Northwestern Okla.
3
2
25
17
22
25
21
25
25
16
15
13
GAME

74.64

2018-10-20 Weatherford, Okla.
Southwestern Okla.
Okla. Baptist
3
1
26
24
25
23
17
25
25
23
GAME

74.35

2018-10-25 Searcy, Ark.
Harding
Henderson St.
3
2
23
25
25
23
25
14
20
25
15
11

HuskerGeek GAC All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 29.1829
2 27.5994
3 25.5699
4 24.4053
5 24.4048
6 24.3130
7 23.7368
8 23.3673
9 22.0836
10 21.9003

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 19.1783
2 16.9155
3 16.4592
4 15.4176
5 14.9011
6 14.4083
7 13.5795
8 13.2079
9 12.4927
10 11.6410

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 20.8988
2 19.3551
3 18.7648
4 16.0427
5 15.5229
6 14.3141
7 14.0199
8 13.8907
9 13.5517
10 13.5269

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2556
2 0.2373
3 0.2283
4 0.2132
5 0.2104
6 0.2104
7 0.2086
8 0.2008
9 0.1962
10 0.1921

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1559
2 0.1360
3 0.1311
4 0.1286
5 0.1257
6 0.1253
7 0.1176
8 0.1155
9 0.1092
10 0.1074

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1866
2 0.1618
3 0.1500
4 0.1417
5 0.1397
6 0.1380
7 0.1362
8 0.1337
9 0.1322
10 0.1298


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek