Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,718.6737

Football michigan 11.0495
Men's Basketball arizona 10.1261
Women's Basketball south carolina 11.9381
Ice Hockey quinnipiac 9.0719
Men's Soccer stanford 8.6575
Women's Soccer florida st 11.3869
Women's Volleyball wisconsin 11.6155
Field Hockey northwestern 9.8733

GLIAC - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 2
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Ferris St. 1,640.7353 1,647.3061 1,644.0174 56.86 61.57 0.196
2nd Grand Valley St. 1,616.7841 1,621.3074 1,619.0442 58.13 57.03 0.214
3rd Wis.-Parkside 1,520.5970 1,518.4750 1,519.5357 54.26 51.70 0.055
4th Michigan Tech 1,514.2034 1,516.9395 1,515.5709 54.18 53.31 0.095
5th Purdue Northwest 1,485.9306 1,487.0563 1,486.4934 53.99 50.38 0.046
6th Davenport 1,485.0409 1,486.8782 1,485.9592 54.33 49.62 0.040
7th Wayne St. (MI) 1,481.8780 1,482.6852 1,482.2815 50.37 50.86 0.042
8th Northern Mich. 1,469.4757 1,469.4330 1,469.4543 54.15 46.76 0.008
9th Lake Superior St. 1,458.1068 1,458.5736 1,458.3402 52.63 48.01 0.007
10th Saginaw Valley 1,382.4106 1,385.2081 1,383.8086 51.80 45.77 -0.024

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Ferris St. 0.2991 40.64 10.73 37.21 47.72 3.29 9.16
2nd Grand Valley St. 0.2935 43.51 14.15 39.60 41.34 4.72 7.35
3rd Michigan Tech 0.2480 38.13 13.32 35.23 45.09 5.43 6.43
4th Wayne St. (MI) 0.2371 40.17 16.45 37.09 44.32 5.29 7.57
5th Wis.-Parkside 0.2159 36.26 14.67 32.86 49.80 4.78 8.23
6th Purdue Northwest 0.2117 35.82 14.64 33.15 48.86 5.12 10.78
7th Davenport 0.2076 35.67 14.91 32.93 49.11 4.82 9.35
8th Northern Mich. 0.1997 34.49 14.51 31.99 48.20 5.09 9.14
9th Lake Superior St. 0.1907 34.22 15.15 31.30 46.56 4.60 8.14
10th Saginaw Valley 0.1627 30.50 14.23 27.91 55.66 4.09 7.92

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Grand Valley St. 0.0793 26.21 18.28 24.23 58.05 7.35 5.55
2nd Ferris St. 0.1028 27.48 17.19 25.81 57.22 6.75 4.66
3rd Michigan Tech 0.1527 32.12 16.85 29.49 51.63 6.52 6.46
4th Wis.-Parkside 0.1614 31.75 15.61 29.97 54.41 5.55 5.43
5th Purdue Northwest 0.1658 32.56 15.98 29.89 52.36 6.23 8.19
6th Davenport 0.1678 31.58 14.79 29.25 53.60 4.96 7.38
7th Lake Superior St. 0.1833 31.90 13.57 29.09 50.36 4.70 6.94
8th Saginaw Valley 0.1869 33.60 14.92 31.04 51.18 5.32 7.94
9th Northern Mich. 0.1921 32.75 13.55 30.63 54.04 4.55 7.63
10th Wayne St. (MI) 0.1956 34.66 15.10 32.38 49.47 5.40 8.36

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,506.4505 1,504.5849 1,493.2158 1,492.5763 1,499.2069
Difference -1.8656 -13.2347 -13.8743 -9.6582

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Ferris St. 129 2,886 1,525 237 250 52.84 12.2 11.5 2,424 1,031 135 280 57.47 18.0 8.7
Grand Valley St. 113 2,620 1,455 171 269 55.53 15.3 9.7 2,150 981 137 167 54.37 15.7 12.9
Wis.-Parkside 114 2,554 1,342 193 211 52.55 13.2 12.1 2,467 1,252 148 235 49.25 16.7 10.5
Michigan Tech 119 2,528 1,287 135 192 50.91 18.7 13.2 2,563 1,292 190 207 49.59 13.5 12.4
Davenport 117 2,461 1,278 204 251 51.93 12.1 9.8 2,523 1,335 200 232 47.09 12.6 10.9
Purdue Northwest 117 2,454 1,260 242 233 51.35 10.1 10.5 2,544 1,340 226 235 47.33 11.3 10.8
Lake Superior St. 113 2,417 1,236 185 236 51.14 13.1 10.2 2,567 1,393 197 201 45.73 13.0 12.8
Wayne St. (MI) 111 2,223 1,069 155 240 48.09 14.3 9.3 2,310 1,198 230 216 48.14 10.0 10.7
Northern Mich. 105 2,216 1,137 182 185 51.31 12.2 12.0 2,386 1,339 199 211 43.88 12.0 11.3
Saginaw Valley 102 2,026 1,022 153 216 50.44 13.2 9.4 2,345 1,317 205 202 43.84 11.4 11.6
Conference Average 114 2,439 1,261 186 228 51.61 13.4 10.8 2,428 1,248 187 219 48.67 13.4 11.2
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the GLIAC

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

79.37

2023-10-27
Wis.-Parkside
Ferris St.
3
2
25
22
14
25
26
24
24
26
15
12
GAME

77.45

2023-11-03
Grand Valley St.
Ferris St.
3
1
27
25
25
22
18
25
25
21
GAME

75.91

2023-10-21 Big Rapids, Mich.
Ferris St.
Grand Valley St.
3
2
25
19
20
25
24
26
25
18
15
9
GAME

74.90

2023-11-04
Purdue Northwest
Ferris St.
2
3
20
25
18
25
25
22
25
21
15
17
GAME

74.81

2023-11-19
Grand Valley St.
Ferris St.
1
3
25
18
22
25
25
27
22
25
GAME

74.63

2023-10-31
Davenport
Grand Valley St.
2
3
25
23
24
26
25
21
19
25
12
15
GAME

74.62

2023-11-10 Big Rapids, Mich.
Ferris St.
Michigan Tech
2
3
25
15
25
23
22
25
24
26
12
15
GAME

74.58

2023-09-23
Davenport
Ferris St.
2
3
25
23
20
25
33
31
13
25
11
15
GAME

74.57

2023-11-03
Michigan Tech
Wayne St. (MI)
3
2
25
19
25
23
23
25
24
26
15
11
GAME

73.39

2023-10-07
Michigan Tech
Wis.-Parkside
3
1
24
26
25
23
25
20
25
20

HuskerGeek GLIAC All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 29.1266
2 27.4675
3 24.5415
4 21.6164
5 21.3026
6 21.1638
7 20.9858
8 20.3716
9 19.8711
10 17.8122

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 17.7285
2 17.5400
3 15.4015
4 13.9669
5 13.6648
6 12.1833
7 12.1153
8 11.9781
9 10.6993
10 10.4034

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 17.7015
2 15.8596
3 15.5909
4 14.7853
5 14.4093
6 13.1897
7 12.7354
8 12.1950
9 11.6582
10 11.3981

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2648
2 0.2231
3 0.2180
4 0.2095
5 0.2059
6 0.1913
7 0.1857
8 0.1756
9 0.1718
10 0.1649

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1612
2 0.1392
3 0.1353
4 0.1270
5 0.1242
6 0.1215
7 0.1101
8 0.1078
9 0.1073
10 0.1033

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1553
2 0.1417
3 0.1413
4 0.1374
5 0.1344
6 0.1311
7 0.1269
8 0.1127
9 0.1079
10 0.1036


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek