Nerdly Nebraska.
2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders
Sport | School | Rating |
---|---|---|
ViPR D1 Volleyball | Wisconsin | 1,711.3731 |
Sport | School | Rating |
---|---|---|
ViPR D1 Volleyball | Wisconsin | 1,711.3731 |
Rnk. | Team | Résumé | Recent | ViPR | Adj SP% | Adj SO% | Adj. Hit Mar. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1st | Houston Baptist | 1,412.2129 | 1,405.8227 | 1,409.0142 | 41.90 | 58.22 | -0.015 |
2nd | Utah Valley | 1,422.4332 | 1,389.2182 | 1,405.7276 | 44.30 | 56.91 | 0.005 |
3rd | NJIT | 1,257.9090 | 1,260.6074 | 1,259.2575 | 35.34 | 52.12 | -0.125 |
4th | UTRGV | 1,243.5547 | 1,215.0302 | 1,229.2097 | -0.07 | 58.60 | -0.147 |
5th | Chicago St. | 1,146.7552 | 1,151.4699 | 1,149.1101 | 31.51 | 44.60 | -0.231 |
ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.
Rnk. | Team | Hit% | Kill% | HE% | AST% | O_DIG% | O_BLK% | ACE% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1st | Houston Baptist | 0.1983 | 34.62 | 14.79 | 32.58 | 50.04 | 5.48 | 5.36 |
2nd | Utah Valley | 0.1918 | 35.23 | 16.04 | 32.68 | 50.24 | 6.79 | 6.14 |
3rd | NJIT | 0.1303 | 30.41 | 17.38 | 28.93 | 53.76 | 7.22 | 3.69 |
4th | UTRGV | 0.1206 | 28.50 | 16.44 | 26.64 | 57.94 | 5.23 | 28.38 |
5th | Chicago St. | 0.0698 | 26.77 | 19.78 | 24.83 | 57.41 | 6.06 | 4.96 |
Rnk. | Team | O_Hit% | O_Kill% | O_HE% | O_AST% | DIG% | BLK% | O_ACE% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1st | Utah Valley | 0.1868 | 36.99 | 18.31 | 34.88 | 45.90 | 7.28 | 5.92 |
2nd | Houston Baptist | 0.2134 | 34.83 | 13.49 | 32.24 | 52.51 | 4.17 | 5.60 |
3rd | NJIT | 0.2549 | 38.21 | 12.72 | 35.30 | 49.20 | 3.21 | 6.21 |
4th | UTRGV | 0.2677 | 40.29 | 13.53 | 37.75 | 45.71 | 4.09 | 5.58 |
5th | Chicago St. | 0.3005 | 42.21 | 12.16 | 39.00 | 45.05 | 3.46 | 7.22 |
Description | Average | Remove First and Last | Remove Top and Bottom 2 | Remove Top and Bottom 3 | Composite |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scores | 1,290.4638 | 1,298.0649 | 1,259.2575 | 0.0000 | 961.9465 |
Difference | 7.6011 | -31.2063 | -1,290.4638 | -438.0230 |
Offense | Defense | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Team | Sets | S | SP | SA | SE | SP% | S/SA | S/SE | OS | SPA | SAA | SEA | SO% | OS/SAA | OS/SEA |
Houston Baptist | 104 | 2,223 | 1,021 | 138 | 149 | 45.93 | 16.1 | 14.9 | 2,046 | 829 | 109 | 151 | 59.48 | 18.8 | 13.5 |
Utah Valley | 103 | 2,014 | 902 | 145 | 180 | 44.79 | 13.9 | 11.2 | 1,971 | 861 | 135 | 179 | 56.32 | 14.6 | 11.0 |
NJIT | 112 | 2,146 | 896 | 121 | 215 | 41.75 | 17.7 | 10.0 | 2,238 | 990 | 153 | 203 | 55.76 | 14.6 | 11.0 |
Chicago St. | 102 | 1,658 | 583 | 98 | 168 | 35.16 | 16.9 | 9.9 | 2,226 | 1,195 | 163 | 207 | 46.32 | 13.7 | 10.8 |
UTRGV | 97 | 50 | 0 | 122 | 211 | 0.00 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 301 | 301 | 137 | 213 | 0.00 | 2.2 | 1.4 |
Conference Average | 104 | 1,618 | 680 | 125 | 185 | 33.53 | 13.0 | 9.2 | 1,756 | 835 | 139 | 191 | 43.58 | 12.8 | 9.6 |
|
|
|
Game Link | EPIC | Game Date | Location | Teams | Sets | Set 1 | Set 2 | Set 3 | Set 4 | Set 5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GAME |
65.56 |
2012-10-06 | Houston, Texas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
63.63 |
2012-10-25 | Orem, Utah |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
62.92 |
2012-11-17 | Orem, Utah |
|
|
|
|
|
||
GAME |
62.54 |
2012-10-13 | Orem, Utah |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
60.85 |
2012-11-16 | Orem, Utah |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
59.07 |
2012-09-27 | Newark, NJ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
58.47 |
2012-11-08 | Newark, NJ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
57.90 |
2012-11-04 | Houston, Texas |
|
|
|
|
|
||
GAME |
56.34 |
2012-10-19 | Orem, Utah |
|
|
|
|
|
||
GAME |
55.54 |
2012-11-10 | Chicago, Ill. |
|
|
|
|
|
Name | Team | Role |
---|---|---|
Valerie Carroll | NJIT | A |
Katie Fritzler | Utah Valley | A |
Camilla Tinari | NJIT | A |
Caiti Wenger | Houston Baptist | A |
Renata Pandolfo | NJIT | D |
Janet Snell | NJIT | D |
Victoria Weatherly | Houston Baptist | S |
Rank | Name | Team |
---|---|---|
1 | Brookelyn Hall | Utah Valley |
2 | Heather Leaverton | Houston Baptist |
3 | Victoria Weatherly | Houston Baptist |
4 | Jasmine Casey | Houston Baptist |
5 | Renata Pandolfo | NJIT |
Rank | Name | Team |
---|---|---|
1 | Erica Nish | Utah Valley |
2 | Kalani Norris | Utah Valley |
3 | Lauren Bakker | Utah Valley |
4 | Caiti Wenger | Houston Baptist |
5 | Madeline Gaffney | Houston Baptist |
Rank | Name | Team |
---|---|---|
1 | Brookelyn Hall | Utah Valley |
2 | Victoria Weatherly | Houston Baptist |
3 | Anna Mercado | NJIT |
4 | Paula Sioto | Chicago St. |
Rank | Name | Team |
---|---|---|
1 | Jasmine Casey | Houston Baptist |
2 | Renata Pandolfo | NJIT |
3 | Mckenna Tait | Utah Valley |
4 | Esther Longoria | Houston Baptist |
5 | Patti Hatch | Utah Valley |
Rk. | Name | Team | WPA |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Brookelyn Hall | Utah Valley | 20.9396 |
2 | Renata Pandolfo | NJIT | 19.8312 |
3 | Heather Leaverton | Houston Baptist | 19.4867 |
4 | Victoria Weatherly | Houston Baptist | 18.8216 |
5 | Janet Snell | NJIT | 15.3831 |
6 | Jasmine Casey | Houston Baptist | 15.2142 |
7 | Anna Mercado | NJIT | 12.7962 |
8 | Mysta Townsell | Chicago St. | 9.9337 |
9 | Camilla Tinari | NJIT | 9.8610 |
10 | Mckenna Tait | Utah Valley | 9.8490 |
Rk. | Name | Team | OWPA |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Brookelyn Hall | Utah Valley | 13.6565 |
2 | Victoria Weatherly | Houston Baptist | 11.8029 |
3 | Heather Leaverton | Houston Baptist | 8.5008 |
4 | Anna Mercado | NJIT | 7.3365 |
5 | Caiti Wenger | Houston Baptist | 7.2742 |
6 | Janet Snell | NJIT | 7.0406 |
7 | Erica Nish | Utah Valley | 6.3448 |
8 | Camilla Tinari | NJIT | 6.1618 |
9 | Madeline Gaffney | Houston Baptist | 5.8496 |
10 | Jasmine Casey | Houston Baptist | 5.3474 |
Rk. | Name | Team | DWPA |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Renata Pandolfo | NJIT | 19.5609 |
2 | Heather Leaverton | Houston Baptist | 10.9859 |
3 | Mysta Townsell | Chicago St. | 10.1414 |
4 | Jasmine Casey | Houston Baptist | 9.8667 |
5 | Esther Longoria | Houston Baptist | 8.6261 |
6 | Mia Townsell | Chicago St. | 8.4045 |
7 | Janet Snell | NJIT | 8.3425 |
8 | Mckenna Tait | Utah Valley | 8.3093 |
9 | Patti Hatch | Utah Valley | 7.3991 |
10 | Brookelyn Hall | Utah Valley | 7.2831 |
Rk. | Name | Team | WPA/S |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Brookelyn Hall | Utah Valley | 0.2301 |
2 | Heather Leaverton | Houston Baptist | 0.1988 |
3 | Victoria Weatherly | Houston Baptist | 0.1940 |
4 | Renata Pandolfo | NJIT | 0.1925 |
5 | Jasmine Casey | Houston Baptist | 0.1878 |
6 | Janet Snell | NJIT | 0.1508 |
7 | Anna Mercado | NJIT | 0.1361 |
8 | Kalani Norris | Utah Valley | 0.1280 |
9 | Erica Nish | Utah Valley | 0.1217 |
10 | Mckenna Tait | Utah Valley | 0.1082 |
Rk. | Name | Team | OWPA/S |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Brookelyn Hall | Utah Valley | 0.1501 |
2 | Victoria Weatherly | Houston Baptist | 0.1217 |
3 | Heather Leaverton | Houston Baptist | 0.0867 |
4 | Erica Nish | Utah Valley | 0.0793 |
5 | Anna Mercado | NJIT | 0.0780 |
6 | Caiti Wenger | Houston Baptist | 0.0742 |
7 | Kalani Norris | Utah Valley | 0.0724 |
8 | Janet Snell | NJIT | 0.0690 |
9 | Jasmine Casey | Houston Baptist | 0.0660 |
10 | Camilla Tinari | NJIT | 0.0649 |
Rk. | Name | Team | DWPA/S |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Renata Pandolfo | NJIT | 0.1899 |
2 | Jasmine Casey | Houston Baptist | 0.1218 |
3 | Heather Leaverton | Houston Baptist | 0.1121 |
4 | Mysta Townsell | Chicago St. | 0.1090 |
5 | Esther Longoria | Houston Baptist | 0.0958 |
6 | Mckenna Tait | Utah Valley | 0.0913 |
7 | Mia Townsell | Chicago St. | 0.0904 |
8 | Patti Hatch | Utah Valley | 0.0860 |
9 | Janet Snell | NJIT | 0.0818 |
10 | Brookelyn Hall | Utah Valley | 0.0800 |
Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts. The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams. This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams. The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores. It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams. The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average. If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating. If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings. It was weighing the average down so to speak. The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.
The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game. EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.
All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them. This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.
Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list. Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric. Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.