Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

Great Northwest - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 2
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Western Wash. 1,651.6035 1,606.4123 1,628.8512 55.60 72.52 0.248
2nd Central Wash. 1,570.2058 1,545.0733 1,557.5889 52.70 64.18 0.153
3rd Alas. Anchorage 1,563.8358 1,541.5293 1,552.6425 50.49 66.66 0.145
4th Northwest Nazarene 1,552.3702 1,527.0718 1,539.6691 50.94 65.21 0.139
5th Seattle Pacific 1,517.2128 1,499.6680 1,508.4149 50.20 62.31 0.127
6th Western Ore. 1,478.2688 1,448.1135 1,463.1135 46.64 61.69 0.098
7th Mont. St. Billings 1,458.2897 1,440.1403 1,449.1866 45.81 60.01 0.057
8th Simon Fraser 1,436.5477 1,416.3239 1,426.4000 45.05 58.69 0.029
9th Saint Martin's 1,437.8519 1,405.0394 1,421.3510 44.45 58.77 0.031
10th Alas. Fairbanks 1,404.6408 1,385.9416 1,395.2599 43.23 56.69 -0.013

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Western Wash. 0.3159 40.21 8.62 36.69 49.78 2.16 5.70
2nd Alas. Anchorage 0.2738 41.09 13.71 38.06 46.02 4.33 7.99
3rd Central Wash. 0.2575 37.68 11.93 34.54 49.06 4.12 7.37
4th Northwest Nazarene 0.2523 38.19 12.96 35.24 49.24 4.68 7.10
5th Alas. Fairbanks 0.2213 39.20 17.07 36.36 43.46 5.75 7.95
6th Western Ore. 0.2212 34.99 12.87 31.65 53.01 4.22 5.69
7th Mont. St. Billings 0.2180 38.08 16.28 35.44 45.65 5.61 5.94
8th Seattle Pacific 0.2141 36.91 15.50 34.35 49.00 5.42 6.94
9th Simon Fraser 0.2087 35.13 14.26 32.26 49.26 5.36 6.52
10th Saint Martin's 0.1885 34.74 15.89 31.79 51.37 4.25 6.48

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Western Wash. 0.0675 24.30 17.55 23.43 60.07 6.24 3.67
2nd Seattle Pacific 0.0869 29.35 20.66 28.17 54.74 7.89 3.74
3rd Central Wash. 0.1045 28.85 18.40 27.78 58.20 6.56 3.82
4th Northwest Nazarene 0.1134 28.78 17.43 27.35 56.77 6.38 4.61
5th Western Ore. 0.1230 30.38 18.08 28.53 54.22 6.09 5.50
6th Alas. Anchorage 0.1291 30.34 17.42 28.26 55.79 7.08 5.13
7th Saint Martin's 0.1578 31.70 15.92 30.18 53.46 6.02 5.77
8th Mont. St. Billings 0.1607 32.49 16.42 30.61 53.06 5.87 5.93
9th Simon Fraser 0.1795 32.77 14.82 30.63 53.86 5.22 4.98
10th Alas. Fairbanks 0.2346 38.76 15.29 36.37 46.41 4.52 6.83

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,494.2477 1,489.7958 1,489.9044 1,490.0960 1,491.0110
Difference -4.4519 -4.3433 -4.1517 -4.3157

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Western Wash. 88 2,096 1,035 93 109 49.38 22.5 19.2 1,647 544 79 160 66.97 20.8 10.3
Northwest Nazarene 85 1,954 884 114 125 45.24 17.1 15.6 1,802 722 95 154 59.93 19.0 11.7
Alas. Anchorage 108 2,449 1,085 162 200 44.30 15.1 12.2 2,271 896 130 234 60.55 17.5 9.7
Central Wash. 101 2,184 995 133 164 45.56 16.4 13.3 2,071 875 97 128 57.75 21.4 16.2
Seattle Pacific 101 2,184 953 124 222 43.64 17.6 9.8 2,197 958 98 182 56.40 22.4 12.1
Western Ore. 110 2,341 951 105 252 40.62 22.3 9.3 2,457 1,071 151 216 56.41 16.3 11.4
Mont. St. Billings 93 1,659 655 92 178 39.48 18.0 9.3 1,818 831 144 141 54.29 12.6 12.9
Simon Fraser 66 1,334 518 71 94 38.83 18.8 14.2 1,517 708 84 104 53.33 18.1 14.6
Saint Martin's 92 1,901 734 101 174 38.61 18.8 10.9 2,152 1,007 146 176 53.21 14.7 12.2
Alas. Fairbanks 99 1,958 723 128 200 36.93 15.3 9.8 2,357 1,153 179 221 51.08 13.2 10.7
Conference Average 94 2,006 853 112 172 42.26 18.2 12.4 2,029 877 120 172 56.99 17.6 12.2
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the Great Northwest

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

76.64

2013-10-24 Bellingham, WA
Western Wash.
Seattle Pacific
1
3
25
27
25
18
22
25
23
25
GAME

76.14

2013-10-19 Bellingham, WA
Western Wash.
Alas. Anchorage
2
3
25
23
24
26
23
25
25
19
12
15
GAME

74.79

2013-09-19 Monmouth, Ore.
Western Ore.
Central Wash.
3
2
17
25
31
29
25
27
25
23
15
8
GAME

74.66

2013-11-07
Mont. St. Billings
Central Wash.
3
2
24
26
26
24
20
25
25
21
18
16
GAME

72.56

2013-11-16 Monmouth, OR
Western Ore.
Seattle Pacific
2
3
20
25
25
23
22
25
25
23
10
15
GAME

72.50

2013-11-14 Anchorage, Alaska
Alas. Anchorage
Western Wash.
1
3
25
22
17
25
15
25
15
25
GAME

72.07

2013-11-09 Seattle, Wash.
Seattle Pacific
Central Wash.
0
3
23
25
17
25
26
28
GAME

71.76

2013-10-03 Burnaby, BC
Simon Fraser
Central Wash.
3
2
25
21
16
25
21
25
30
28
15
8
GAME

71.24

2013-11-09
Mont. St. Billings
Northwest Nazarene
1
3
22
25
20
25
25
18
20
25
GAME

71.19

2013-11-02 Ellensburg, WA
Central Wash.
Simon Fraser
3
1
25
21
24
26
25
13
25
20

HuskerGeek Great Northwest All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 20.1425
2 17.8583
3 17.8315
4 17.2610
5 17.1954
6 16.6925
7 16.6769
8 16.4161
9 15.7333
10 15.7234

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 12.6818
2 12.3303
3 11.4984
4 11.0415
5 10.7250
6 10.5408
7 9.6969
8 9.0493
9 8.5129
10 8.3630

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 17.9857
2 16.9226
3 16.7143
4 15.0256
5 14.1654
6 11.7879
7 9.9197
8 9.7659
9 9.6731
10 9.6017

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2205
2 0.1999
3 0.1981
4 0.1865
5 0.1857
6 0.1851
7 0.1850
8 0.1798
9 0.1712
10 0.1698

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1451
2 0.1324
3 0.1321
4 0.1307
5 0.1255
6 0.1045
7 0.0979
8 0.0979
9 0.0976
10 0.0930

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1944
2 0.1763
3 0.1697
4 0.1422
5 0.1403
6 0.1391
7 0.1387
8 0.1221
9 0.1153
10 0.1115


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek