Nerdly Nebraska.

2021-2022 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Louisville 1,717.9455

Football georgia 12.7744
Men's Soccer new hampshire 10.6445
Women's Soccer north carolina 11.4036
Women's Volleyball wisconsin 12.1463
Field Hockey penn st 9.6697

Great Northwest - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 2
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Central Wash. 1,679.0993 1,676.1124 1,677.6052 76.95 77.22 0.253
2nd Alas. Anchorage 1,650.3128 1,649.1439 1,649.7283 74.81 70.78 0.231
3rd Alas. Fairbanks 1,644.1138 1,641.8080 1,642.9605 73.42 71.27 0.202
4th Western Wash. 1,612.6834 1,612.7515 1,612.7174 68.83 76.72 0.222
5th Simon Fraser 1,606.5027 1,607.5110 1,607.0068 73.00 69.57 0.227
6th Seattle Pacific 1,594.3586 1,590.0579 1,592.2068 72.32 69.02 0.177
7th Saint Martin's 1,529.7941 1,529.0804 1,529.4372 65.08 44.83 0.103
8th Mont. St. Billings 1,518.1123 1,516.9734 1,517.5427 67.55 69.38 0.101
9th Western Ore. 1,507.5649 1,506.0907 1,506.8276 70.89 74.14 0.084
10th Northwest Nazarene 1,497.0185 1,492.0396 1,494.5269 68.53 64.92 0.092

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Alas. Anchorage 0.3878 42.56 3.78 38.84 43.52 3.41 10.24
2nd Central Wash. 0.3853 42.15 3.62 39.58 41.88 4.65 6.36
3rd Western Wash. 0.3782 41.35 3.53 37.91 47.03 4.19 6.86
4th Simon Fraser 0.3735 42.38 5.03 38.28 41.50 3.95 6.36
5th Seattle Pacific 0.3565 43.40 7.75 40.15 39.66 6.21 7.76
6th Alas. Fairbanks 0.3420 39.15 4.96 35.54 45.36 4.79 8.03
7th Western Ore. 0.3160 36.48 4.88 33.35 49.10 4.26 7.19
8th Northwest Nazarene 0.3091 34.76 3.86 31.90 52.42 4.08 7.08
9th Mont. St. Billings 0.2979 35.40 5.60 32.54 50.75 3.99 7.79
10th Saint Martin's 0.2721 34.00 6.79 31.25 51.22 5.23 10.67

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Central Wash. 0.1322 25.73 12.50 24.05 60.08 7.43 2.82
2nd Alas. Fairbanks 0.1401 25.77 11.76 23.96 58.25 7.37 6.23
3rd Simon Fraser 0.1465 25.89 11.25 23.46 57.20 5.54 7.22
4th Western Wash. 0.1559 27.48 11.89 26.38 56.95 7.15 7.92
5th Alas. Anchorage 0.1571 27.79 12.08 24.79 56.75 6.24 9.28
6th Saint Martin's 0.1695 26.49 9.54 23.34 60.42 5.48 5.69
7th Seattle Pacific 0.1796 30.02 12.06 26.93 53.46 8.25 9.46
8th Mont. St. Billings 0.1965 31.54 11.90 28.96 52.46 6.57 11.06
9th Northwest Nazarene 0.2169 29.76 8.07 27.75 55.94 4.26 9.66
10th Western Ore. 0.2320 31.88 8.68 28.47 52.84 6.13 6.77

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,583.0559 1,582.3034 1,583.6452 1,585.3421 1,583.5867
Difference -0.7525 0.5893 2.2861 0.7076

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Central Wash. 38 587 312 62 72 53.15 9.5 8.2 488 209 35 67 57.17 13.9 7.3
Western Ore. 40 806 461 62 81 57.20 13.0 10.0 703 334 53 62 52.49 13.3 11.3
Alas. Anchorage 57 1,238 698 132 145 56.38 9.4 8.5 1,113 557 108 106 49.96 10.3 10.5
Alas. Fairbanks 59 1,253 680 106 108 54.27 11.8 11.6 1,122 557 69 93 50.36 16.3 12.1
Simon Fraser 38 671 339 45 80 50.52 14.9 8.4 651 326 49 75 49.92 13.3 8.7
Seattle Pacific 41 821 424 71 71 51.64 11.6 11.6 827 432 89 69 47.76 9.3 12.0
Western Wash. 42 820 367 50 77 44.76 16.4 10.6 816 371 67 80 54.53 12.2 10.2
Mont. St. Billings 42 727 335 55 67 46.08 13.2 10.9 781 381 98 84 51.22 8.0 9.3
Northwest Nazarene 38 762 359 56 42 47.11 13.6 18.1 888 494 79 57 44.37 11.2 15.6
Saint Martin's 47 488 219 78 84 44.88 6.3 5.8 856 635 77 82 25.82 11.1 10.4
Conference Average 44 817 419 72 83 50.60 12.0 10.4 825 430 72 78 48.36 11.9 10.7
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the Great Northwest

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

74.94

2021-09-23
Alas. Fairbanks
Seattle Pacific
3
1
20
25
25
21
25
20
25
23
GAME

74.59

2021-09-16
Seattle Pacific
Northwest Nazarene
3
1
25
17
25
19
24
26
25
21
GAME

72.45

2021-09-25
Northwest Nazarene
Western Wash.
1
3
13
25
27
25
22
25
22
25
GAME

72.41

2021-09-18 Buranby,BC
Simon Fraser
Western Wash.
2
3
13
25
25
19
25
20
23
25
9
15
GAME

72.30

2021-09-23
Central Wash.
Western Wash.
3
1
25
13
19
25
25
15
25
23
GAME

70.76

2021-09-16 Billings, MT
Mont. St. Billings
Central Wash.
1
3
25
23
15
25
18
25
23
25
GAME

70.74

2021-09-25
Central Wash.
Simon Fraser
3
0
25
17
25
21
25
15
GAME

70.40

2021-09-16 Monmouth, Ore.
Western Ore.
Alas. Fairbanks
0
3
17
25
24
26
17
25
GAME

69.90

2021-09-23
Northwest Nazarene
Simon Fraser
2
3
25
17
21
25
19
25
27
25
8
15
GAME

69.80

2021-09-18
Saint Martin's
Alas. Fairbanks
0
3
14
25
19
25
21
25

HuskerGeek Great Northwest All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 14.7026
2 12.5684
3 11.7200
4 7.3970
5 7.2695
6 7.2444
7 7.1474
8 6.9533
9 6.6979
10 6.5629

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 8.5083
2 7.6726
3 6.2659
4 4.2819
5 3.7232
6 3.6938
7 3.6621
8 3.3902
9 3.3468
10 3.3166

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 7.7075
2 7.5125
3 6.2640
4 6.1943
5 5.4589
6 5.4541
7 5.1460
8 4.8957
9 4.3204
10 4.3201

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2749
2 0.2673
3 0.2514
4 0.2344
5 0.2233
6 0.2193
7 0.2188
8 0.2113
9 0.1860
10 0.1853

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1647
2 0.1547
3 0.1535
4 0.1377
5 0.1253
6 0.1231
7 0.1116
8 0.1097
9 0.1034
10 0.1005

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.2146
2 0.1629
3 0.1572
4 0.1560
5 0.1559
6 0.1434
7 0.1401
8 0.1394
9 0.1335
10 0.1265


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek