Nerdly Nebraska.

2022-2023 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Texas 1,730.6611

Football georgia 11.6118
Men's Basketball houston 9.4563
Women's Basketball south carolina 11.7610
Softball columbia 5.0000
Ice Hockey minnesota 8.5914
Men's Lacrosse marquette 7.9259
Men's Soccer kentucky 8.7687
Women's Soccer ucla 11.0741
Men's Volleyball long beach st 9.3011
Women's Volleyball texas 12.4762
Field Hockey north carolina 10.0384

Great Northwest - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 2
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Alas. Anchorage 1,685.0557 1,686.7958 1,685.9255 61.78 61.72 0.244
2nd Western Wash. 1,649.6766 1,651.4116 1,650.5439 57.64 61.91 0.227
3rd Central Wash. 1,617.3719 1,617.5213 1,617.4466 57.84 59.42 0.202
4th Northwest Nazarene 1,588.5875 1,592.9814 1,590.7830 60.77 53.89 0.177
5th Seattle Pacific 1,574.4740 1,574.1069 1,574.2904 59.17 54.68 0.154
6th Simon Fraser 1,574.0403 1,572.8514 1,573.4457 57.71 55.05 0.160
7th Alas. Fairbanks 1,544.3814 1,547.4724 1,545.9261 55.82 54.05 0.114
8th Saint Martin's 1,500.3073 1,506.2080 1,503.2547 54.64 52.40 0.077
9th Western Ore. 1,493.5918 1,494.6511 1,494.1214 53.07 51.91 0.056
10th Mont. St. Billings 1,442.2196 1,450.5458 1,446.3767 52.45 50.17 0.010

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Alas. Anchorage 0.3281 44.13 11.32 40.55 42.60 3.65 11.22
2nd Western Wash. 0.3149 42.91 11.42 39.68 44.12 3.48 8.26
3rd Central Wash. 0.2982 42.15 12.34 39.61 42.13 5.19 8.34
4th Northwest Nazarene 0.2777 39.27 11.50 36.26 47.25 4.03 9.99
5th Simon Fraser 0.2658 40.30 13.72 37.49 43.68 4.96 9.65
6th Seattle Pacific 0.2556 38.93 13.37 35.91 43.57 5.93 10.05
7th Alas. Fairbanks 0.2477 40.09 15.31 36.87 43.74 5.96 10.61
8th Western Ore. 0.2361 39.01 15.40 36.56 43.74 5.19 7.52
9th Saint Martin's 0.2184 36.81 14.97 33.25 45.18 5.08 8.98
10th Mont. St. Billings 0.1889 33.71 14.82 31.02 49.34 4.76 8.86

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Alas. Anchorage 0.0846 27.38 18.92 26.04 57.44 7.04 6.19
2nd Western Wash. 0.0875 27.65 18.90 26.42 57.04 7.39 4.19
3rd Central Wash. 0.0958 27.59 18.01 25.91 56.82 7.79 4.61
4th Northwest Nazarene 0.1012 27.02 16.90 24.89 59.95 6.10 5.72
5th Seattle Pacific 0.1020 28.79 18.59 26.03 55.62 7.05 6.53
6th Simon Fraser 0.1056 28.27 17.71 26.34 56.63 6.94 6.57
7th Alas. Fairbanks 0.1338 30.54 17.16 27.92 54.54 7.81 5.67
8th Saint Martin's 0.1417 30.62 16.44 27.96 52.63 5.52 8.02
9th Mont. St. Billings 0.1793 33.05 15.12 29.48 50.91 5.30 7.32
10th Western Ore. 0.1799 32.97 14.97 30.58 52.04 5.15 5.98

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,568.2114 1,568.7265 1,567.5244 1,571.1113 1,568.8934
Difference 0.5151 -0.6870 2.8999 0.9093

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Alas. Anchorage 105 2,496 1,407 250 201 56.37 10.0 12.4 1,985 862 157 232 56.57 12.6 8.6
Western Wash. 100 2,302 1,156 153 174 50.22 15.0 13.2 2,062 914 123 180 55.67 16.8 11.5
Northwest Nazarene 95 2,036 1,131 185 185 55.55 11.0 11.0 1,859 945 144 147 49.17 12.9 12.6
Central Wash. 107 2,401 1,224 171 220 50.98 14.0 10.9 2,217 1,034 144 169 53.36 15.4 13.1
Seattle Pacific 100 2,147 1,117 185 199 52.03 11.6 10.8 2,161 1,113 182 194 48.50 11.9 11.1
Simon Fraser 112 2,304 1,163 187 197 50.48 12.3 11.7 2,318 1,177 200 239 49.22 11.6 9.7
Saint Martin's 102 1,951 990 172 231 50.74 11.3 8.4 1,971 1,017 199 197 48.40 9.9 10.0
Alas. Fairbanks 115 2,375 1,193 237 226 50.23 10.0 10.5 2,379 1,217 176 201 48.84 13.5 11.8
Western Ore. 98 2,057 991 132 199 48.18 15.6 10.3 2,248 1,193 174 210 46.93 12.9 10.7
Mont. St. Billings 88 1,735 826 133 137 47.61 13.0 12.7 2,022 1,107 178 203 45.25 11.4 10.0
Conference Average 102 2,180 1,120 181 197 51.24 12.4 11.2 2,122 1,058 168 197 50.19 12.9 10.9
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the Great Northwest

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

78.80

2022-10-29
Central Wash.
Western Wash.
2
3
24
26
23
25
25
19
25
20
14
16
GAME

78.65

2022-11-05
Alas. Anchorage
Central Wash.
3
0
25
20
28
26
25
22
GAME

76.06

2022-11-17
Western Wash.
Central Wash.
1
3
25
27
21
25
25
20
22
25
GAME

76.05

2022-10-22
Western Wash.
Alas. Anchorage
1
3
12
25
16
25
25
21
23
25
GAME

76.04

2022-10-15
Simon Fraser
Western Wash.
2
3
25
23
22
25
19
25
25
23
8
15
GAME

75.82

2022-11-03
Alas. Anchorage
Northwest Nazarene
3
1
24
26
25
17
25
22
25
22
GAME

75.02

2022-11-05
Alas. Fairbanks
Northwest Nazarene
3
2
17
25
17
25
25
23
25
21
15
13
GAME

74.45

2022-10-20
Simon Fraser
Alas. Anchorage
3
1
25
23
23
25
25
22
25
23
GAME

73.95

2022-09-10
Simon Fraser
Seattle Pacific
3
2
26
24
25
18
23
25
23
25
15
8
GAME

73.94

2022-09-17
Seattle Pacific
Alas. Anchorage
2
3
21
25
17
25
25
16
26
24
12
15

HuskerGeek Great Northwest All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 31.1080
2 24.3899
3 23.2866
4 19.6943
5 18.4408
6 18.2795
7 17.8811
8 17.3917
9 17.2891
10 16.5379

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 20.7305
2 14.2792
3 13.4100
4 11.2821
5 11.2601
6 11.0752
7 10.5372
8 10.3172
9 10.3063
10 10.2898

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 15.8981
2 15.3477
3 12.7078
4 12.0264
5 11.7216
6 11.2083
7 10.8889
8 10.3776
9 10.3338
10 10.1107

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2963
2 0.2401
3 0.2323
4 0.2049
5 0.1882
6 0.1841
7 0.1837
8 0.1741
9 0.1727
10 0.1616

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1974
2 0.1360
3 0.1253
4 0.1227
5 0.1225
6 0.1188
7 0.1161
8 0.1156
9 0.1143
10 0.1064

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1434
2 0.1432
3 0.1412
4 0.1240
5 0.1146
6 0.1136
7 0.1132
8 0.1118
9 0.1116
10 0.1069


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek