Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

Gulf South - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 2
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st West Florida 1,596.1627 1,593.7364 1,594.9491 58.95 65.19 0.221
2nd Alabama Huntsville 1,556.0653 1,553.7608 1,554.9126 62.35 60.98 0.155
3rd Mississippi Col. 1,549.3362 1,546.6161 1,547.9756 60.80 56.94 0.150
4th Montevallo 1,517.2369 1,514.7228 1,515.9793 60.42 57.77 0.157
5th Union (TN) 1,499.8051 1,497.6181 1,498.7112 59.33 60.74 0.149
6th AUM 1,471.7344 1,469.5795 1,470.6566 56.61 60.51 0.124
7th West Ga. 1,455.5116 1,453.6441 1,454.5776 58.54 57.89 0.099
8th Lee 1,415.0499 1,413.0921 1,414.0707 56.42 53.84 0.065
9th Valdosta St. 1,405.0839 1,402.9191 1,404.0011 53.13 55.05 0.059
10th Shorter 1,377.6103 1,375.4646 1,376.5370 60.34 49.31 0.024
11th West Ala. 1,374.8177 1,372.7519 1,373.7844 55.52 52.58 -0.001
12th Christian Brothers 1,253.0391 1,250.7626 1,251.9003 53.50 46.48 -0.075

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st West Florida 0.3904 45.99 6.95 42.10 33.71 5.20 6.48
2nd Mississippi Col. 0.3534 39.35 4.01 36.70 44.84 1.38 9.21
3rd Union (TN) 0.3456 36.60 2.04 32.79 50.15 2.55 8.30
4th Alabama Huntsville 0.3403 37.07 3.04 35.56 48.73 3.57 7.66
5th Montevallo 0.3311 37.96 4.84 35.84 46.75 2.87 8.64
6th AUM 0.3257 37.46 4.89 36.58 47.88 3.21 7.61
7th Valdosta St. 0.3113 37.95 6.82 34.30 45.74 4.75 6.41
8th West Ga. 0.3078 33.51 2.73 31.73 54.81 1.66 6.38
9th Lee 0.2911 35.14 6.03 32.76 49.54 2.90 7.11
10th West Ala. 0.2366 29.26 5.60 28.83 54.12 3.64 7.34
11th Shorter 0.2302 30.00 6.99 27.68 54.05 3.91 9.08
12th Christian Brothers 0.1900 29.24 10.23 27.41 52.93 4.37 7.51

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st West Florida 0.1690 27.39 10.50 25.51 56.17 8.28 5.09
2nd Montevallo 0.1743 28.20 10.77 25.41 57.11 7.48 7.40
3rd Alabama Huntsville 0.1848 29.61 11.13 27.17 56.34 7.61 5.73
4th Union (TN) 0.1963 31.10 11.48 27.46 53.17 8.56 5.78
5th AUM 0.2015 29.44 9.29 27.42 58.10 6.97 5.76
6th Mississippi Col. 0.2032 31.82 11.50 28.03 53.59 6.00 4.83
7th Shorter 0.2059 32.34 11.75 27.94 52.60 7.65 9.34
8th West Ga. 0.2093 30.67 9.75 27.16 56.55 7.01 4.59
9th Lee 0.2257 32.28 9.71 28.82 53.23 6.85 6.77
10th West Ala. 0.2380 32.89 9.09 30.03 52.22 6.99 7.57
11th Valdosta St. 0.2525 32.74 7.49 29.59 54.78 5.40 8.75
12th Christian Brothers 0.2650 34.36 7.86 29.78 49.37 3.95 9.02

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,454.8379 1,461.1206 1,460.3136 1,459.6661 1,458.9846
Difference 6.2826 5.4757 4.8281 5.5288

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Alabama Huntsville 35 812 456 56 54 56.16 14.5 15.0 702 331 43 56 52.85 16.3 12.5
West Ala. 33 756 476 51 37 62.96 14.8 20.4 673 382 59 71 43.24 11.4 9.5
Mississippi Col. 31 703 397 65 59 56.47 10.8 11.9 591 302 33 47 48.90 17.9 12.6
AUM 30 687 352 52 53 51.24 13.2 13.0 649 307 38 41 52.70 17.1 15.8
West Ga. 36 741 398 50 60 53.71 14.8 12.4 766 389 41 56 49.22 18.7 13.7
West Florida 11 237 104 11 22 43.88 21.5 10.8 226 95 10 20 57.97 22.6 11.3
Montevallo 46 988 548 81 68 55.47 12.2 14.5 922 504 70 70 45.34 13.2 13.2
Shorter 36 746 438 63 64 58.71 11.8 11.7 721 422 69 69 41.47 10.4 10.4
Union (TN) 31 623 351 51 63 56.34 12.2 9.9 721 447 47 50 38.00 15.3 14.4
Lee 29 621 305 40 47 49.11 15.5 13.2 674 370 49 49 45.10 13.8 13.8
Valdosta St. 34 726 324 39 53 44.63 18.6 13.7 813 429 74 60 47.23 11.0 13.6
Christian Brothers 16 271 126 17 36 46.49 15.9 7.5 389 244 37 35 37.28 10.5 11.1
Conference Average 31 659 356 48 51 52.93 14.7 12.8 654 352 48 52 46.61 14.9 12.7
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the Gulf South

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

74.70

2021-04-07
Lee
Alabama Huntsville
3
1
27
25
25
27
25
22
25
23
GAME

70.71

2021-03-31 Hoover, AL
AUM
Alabama Huntsville
1
3
22
25
20
25
25
19
22
25
GAME

70.13

2021-03-06 Valdosta, Ga.
West Ga.
Montevallo
1
3
22
25
18
25
25
21
22
25
GAME

69.83

2021-03-10
Alabama Huntsville
Union (TN)
2
3
25
14
25
22
19
25
23
25
13
15
GAME

69.76

2021-03-13 Rome, GA
Lee
Valdosta St.
2
3
24
26
27
25
23
25
25
18
9
15
GAME

69.54

2021-03-03 Livingston, Ala.
West Ala.
Mississippi Col.
2
3
26
28
25
23
25
23
17
25
8
15
GAME

69.49

2021-03-06
Mississippi Col.
Alabama Huntsville
2
3
23
25
25
16
25
22
21
25
8
15
GAME

69.45

2021-03-31 Hoover, AL
Mississippi Col.
Montevallo
1
3
23
25
25
22
20
25
17
25
GAME

69.36

2021-02-24 Montgomery, AL
Montevallo
West Ala.
3
2
22
25
25
17
22
25
25
17
15
10
GAME

69.36

2021-03-20
Union (TN)
Mississippi Col.
2
3
22
25
19
25
25
19
25
23
14
16

HuskerGeek Gulf South All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 9.9795
2 7.8438
3 7.6827
4 7.5079
5 7.4776
6 7.4151
7 7.2014
8 6.9665
9 6.9066
10 6.7570

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 5.3476
2 5.3176
3 4.5481
4 4.5309
5 4.2229
6 4.1587
7 3.8787
8 3.8483
9 3.7112
10 3.6855

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 6.3321
2 5.4407
3 5.3745
4 5.0568
5 4.6620
6 4.4057
7 4.2246
8 4.2200
9 3.9954
10 3.9351

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2935
2 0.2503
3 0.2322
4 0.2260
5 0.2224
6 0.2208
7 0.2099
8 0.2000
9 0.1932
10 0.1919

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1564
2 0.1408
3 0.1338
4 0.1333
5 0.1296
6 0.1293
7 0.1220
8 0.1189
9 0.1171
10 0.1163

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1744
2 0.1600
3 0.1536
4 0.1407
5 0.1377
6 0.1371
7 0.1361
8 0.1357
9 0.1283
10 0.1173


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek