Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

HCAC - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Hanover 1,420.6715 1,456.8227 1,438.6336 54.04 66.25 0.188
2nd Bluffton 1,398.0460 1,435.6138 1,416.7054 53.61 64.17 0.150
3rd Rose-Hulman 1,339.2877 1,370.8828 1,354.9932 49.19 58.30 0.094
4th Defiance 1,335.7598 1,369.9817 1,352.7626 50.63 58.68 0.071
5th Transylvania 1,307.9309 1,335.9756 1,321.8789 50.84 56.31 0.082
6th Manchester 1,292.3699 1,346.4220 1,319.1191 48.15 57.38 0.025
7th Mt. St. Joseph 1,294.0842 1,325.9208 1,309.9058 50.20 56.18 0.043
8th Franklin 1,274.5912 1,332.5622 1,303.2544 47.47 53.41 0.057
9th Anderson (IN) 1,258.6966 1,299.2343 1,278.8048 47.33 55.12 0.009
10th Earlham 1,194.2948 1,220.2145 1,207.1851 45.11 50.13 -0.061

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Bluffton 0.2619 38.43 12.24 35.80 47.86 3.71 9.24
2nd Hanover 0.2501 37.81 12.80 34.50 49.19 3.09 6.06
3rd Rose-Hulman 0.2050 32.72 12.21 30.20 53.44 2.94 8.27
4th Defiance 0.1956 33.08 13.52 30.29 53.27 3.94 9.69
5th Mt. St. Joseph 0.1864 33.94 15.30 32.00 53.76 4.92 9.78
6th Transylvania 0.1817 35.39 17.21 32.39 47.94 4.92 8.50
7th Franklin 0.1721 31.88 14.67 30.28 54.87 3.92 9.12
8th Manchester 0.1704 34.70 17.65 32.69 47.21 5.15 9.31
9th Anderson (IN) 0.1700 32.81 15.81 30.05 52.94 3.53 7.09
10th Earlham 0.1229 30.65 18.36 28.52 52.45 4.60 8.86

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Hanover 0.0623 25.02 18.79 23.72 58.45 7.20 4.78
2nd Transylvania 0.1000 26.71 16.71 25.04 59.55 4.49 7.18
3rd Rose-Hulman 0.1111 27.47 16.37 24.59 60.16 5.50 6.67
4th Bluffton 0.1118 27.83 16.65 26.31 59.06 4.58 6.22
5th Franklin 0.1147 28.68 17.22 26.75 63.42 5.76 6.23
6th Defiance 0.1245 28.08 15.63 26.31 59.63 4.14 6.11
7th Mt. St. Joseph 0.1437 30.54 16.18 28.61 53.97 4.90 5.87
8th Manchester 0.1457 30.59 16.02 28.33 57.41 4.64 5.04
9th Anderson (IN) 0.1606 31.37 15.32 29.67 55.50 3.77 6.09
10th Earlham 0.1843 32.29 13.86 29.83 58.22 3.17 8.15

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,330.3243 1,332.1780 1,326.9856 1,325.9166 1,328.8511
Difference 1.8537 -3.3386 -4.4077 -1.9642

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Hanover 124 2,507 1,214 117 197 48.42 21.4 12.7 2,185 880 135 202 59.73 16.2 10.8
Bluffton 116 2,501 1,197 192 178 47.86 13.0 14.1 2,291 967 162 195 57.79 14.1 11.7
Mt. St. Joseph 102 1,515 732 173 173 48.32 8.8 8.8 1,493 707 143 145 52.65 10.4 10.3
Transylvania 97 1,905 913 137 221 47.93 13.9 8.6 1,894 906 163 159 52.17 11.6 11.9
Manchester 77 1,440 660 146 167 45.83 9.9 8.6 1,459 678 93 153 53.53 15.7 9.5
Franklin 89 583 278 143 130 47.68 4.1 4.5 599 294 137 140 50.92 4.4 4.3
Defiance 94 1,688 752 151 141 44.55 11.2 12.0 1,775 843 127 151 52.51 14.0 11.8
Anderson (IN) 95 1,566 710 116 124 45.34 13.5 12.6 1,658 808 149 177 51.27 11.1 9.4
Rose-Hulman 103 1,389 598 124 133 43.05 11.2 10.4 1,518 737 154 196 51.45 9.9 7.7
Earlham 86 1,044 455 122 138 43.58 8.6 7.6 1,209 636 176 132 47.40 6.9 9.2
Conference Average 98 1,614 751 142 160 46.26 11.5 10.0 1,608 746 144 165 52.94 11.4 9.7
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the HCAC

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

73.48

2016-11-05 Hanover, Ind.
Bluffton
Rose-Hulman
3
2
26
24
21
25
26
24
24
26
15
12
GAME

68.25

2016-11-06 Hanover, Ind.
Hanover
Bluffton
1
3
23
25
25
23
23
25
17
25
GAME

68.13

2016-10-30 Defiance, Ohio
Defiance
Hanover
2
3
26
24
21
25
25
22
22
25
4
15
GAME

67.19

2016-10-29 Bluffton, Ohio
Bluffton
Hanover
1
3
25
21
15
25
23
25
22
25
GAME

65.21

2016-10-25 Hanover, Ind.
Hanover
Transylvania
3
1
25
23
26
28
26
24
25
15
GAME

64.85

2016-10-07 Defiance, Ohio
Defiance
Transylvania
1
3
25
27
27
25
23
25
25
27
GAME

64.14

2016-10-05 Defiance, Ohio
Defiance
Bluffton
0
3
17
25
28
30
18
25
GAME

63.84

2016-10-08 Bluffton, Ohio
Bluffton
Transylvania
3
0
25
13
25
21
28
26
GAME

63.70

2016-10-19 Anderson, Ind.
Anderson (IN)
Defiance
1
3
16
25
25
22
19
25
27
29
GAME

63.52

2016-10-12 Anderson, Ind.
Anderson (IN)
Bluffton
1
3
25
21
23
25
23
25
13
25

HuskerGeek HCAC All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 24.0304
2 19.4989
3 18.5994
4 18.0253
5 16.6258
6 15.9287
7 15.7271
8 14.8275
9 14.7747
10 14.1838

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 17.1981
2 13.4258
3 12.4074
4 11.0698
5 9.9476
6 8.1658
7 7.7670
8 6.8945
9 6.8106
10 6.8087

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 15.9579
2 15.4641
3 15.2877
4 15.2871
5 12.2035
6 11.4919
7 10.9785
8 8.9937
9 8.5097
10 8.2452

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2241
2 0.2205
3 0.2105
4 0.2059
5 0.2042
6 0.1976
7 0.1808
8 0.1722
9 0.1714
10 0.1685

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1578
2 0.1426
3 0.1382
4 0.1243
5 0.1061
6 0.1016
7 0.0946
8 0.0911
9 0.0863
10 0.0860

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1960
2 0.1849
3 0.1757
4 0.1715
5 0.1594
6 0.1491
7 0.1474
8 0.1363
9 0.1194
10 0.1182


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek