Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

HCAC - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Transylvania 1,444.8357 1,459.0729 1,451.9368 53.11 64.28 0.170
2nd Rose-Hulman 1,432.5055 1,446.1676 1,439.3203 53.48 63.41 0.134
3rd Bluffton 1,411.7129 1,424.9466 1,418.3143 52.66 61.46 0.107
4th Hanover 1,386.4738 1,411.4470 1,398.9047 51.27 60.45 0.131
5th Earlham 1,347.3718 1,374.1041 1,360.6723 50.65 57.91 0.071
6th Defiance 1,332.5893 1,353.2772 1,342.8934 48.66 57.77 0.076
7th Mt. St. Joseph 1,325.0208 1,348.8524 1,336.8835 48.95 59.62 0.042
8th Franklin 1,281.9060 1,291.9528 1,286.9196 46.87 54.32 0.015
9th Manchester 1,276.9684 1,294.1830 1,285.5469 46.19 52.63 0.010
10th Anderson (IN) 1,265.2009 1,279.1573 1,272.1600 46.92 52.54 -0.007

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Rose-Hulman 0.2482 36.00 11.18 33.75 51.77 3.25 10.55
2nd Transylvania 0.2358 37.85 14.27 35.03 48.34 4.40 7.54
3rd Bluffton 0.2309 36.97 13.88 34.08 49.20 3.65 10.55
4th Earlham 0.2241 37.97 15.56 35.72 45.60 4.01 8.79
5th Hanover 0.2193 35.58 13.64 32.91 50.68 3.35 7.99
6th Defiance 0.1965 33.44 13.79 31.58 53.84 3.51 9.38
7th Mt. St. Joseph 0.1924 33.77 14.53 30.68 53.67 4.74 10.64
8th Franklin 0.1726 33.33 16.07 31.62 54.78 3.96 9.29
9th Manchester 0.1663 34.64 18.01 30.61 50.31 5.25 8.27
10th Anderson (IN) 0.1610 34.08 17.97 32.62 52.34 5.30 9.78

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Transylvania 0.0655 24.39 17.84 23.14 61.49 5.34 4.14
2nd Hanover 0.0879 26.87 18.09 25.45 58.98 5.95 5.24
3rd Rose-Hulman 0.1143 28.11 16.68 26.83 58.75 5.06 6.35
4th Defiance 0.1200 28.84 16.84 27.51 58.27 4.37 7.35
5th Bluffton 0.1240 27.37 14.97 26.02 60.89 3.96 4.37
6th Mt. St. Joseph 0.1509 29.68 14.60 27.64 54.12 3.47 4.77
7th Earlham 0.1528 29.71 14.42 27.61 60.23 3.41 7.34
8th Manchester 0.1560 31.02 15.42 27.74 55.18 3.98 8.78
9th Franklin 0.1575 31.29 15.54 29.21 56.01 3.90 8.44
10th Anderson (IN) 0.1678 32.16 15.38 29.92 58.29 3.96 9.87

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,359.3552 1,358.6819 1,357.4313 1,359.8385 1,358.8267
Difference -0.6733 -1.9239 0.4833 -0.7046

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Rose-Hulman 111 2,320 1,143 196 183 49.27 11.8 12.7 2,117 929 170 201 56.12 12.5 10.5
Transylvania 95 2,102 1,021 113 163 48.57 18.6 12.9 1,928 840 110 172 56.43 17.5 11.2
Hanover 100 2,014 956 130 162 47.47 15.5 12.4 1,906 852 127 154 55.30 15.0 12.4
Earlham 102 1,926 938 181 207 48.70 10.6 9.3 1,860 863 165 151 53.60 11.3 12.3
Bluffton 100 2,205 1,039 186 140 47.12 11.9 15.8 2,133 966 110 150 54.71 19.4 14.2
Franklin 92 1,832 848 142 133 46.29 12.9 13.8 1,970 998 185 140 49.34 10.6 14.1
Defiance 89 1,837 795 137 147 43.28 13.4 12.5 1,977 945 166 150 52.20 11.9 13.2
Anderson (IN) 89 1,350 601 166 154 44.52 8.1 8.8 1,526 785 211 147 48.56 7.2 10.4
Manchester 79 1,331 574 107 148 43.13 12.4 9.0 1,545 796 166 151 48.48 9.3 10.2
Mt. St. Joseph 72 922 406 93 96 44.04 9.9 9.6 1,146 654 99 125 42.93 11.6 9.2
Conference Average 93 1,784 832 145 153 46.24 12.5 11.7 1,811 863 151 154 51.77 12.6 11.8
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the HCAC

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

70.15

2018-11-04 Lexington, KY
Transylvania
Rose-Hulman
1
3
21
25
25
22
23
25
17
25
GAME

70.01

2018-10-03 Bluffton, Ohio
Bluffton
Mt. St. Joseph
3
2
25
20
23
25
22
25
25
21
15
13
GAME

69.96

2018-10-27
Defiance
Rose-Hulman
2
3
25
21
25
23
19
25
19
25
12
15
GAME

67.61

2018-10-14 Bluffton, Ohio
Bluffton
Transylvania
1
3
25
20
19
25
23
25
16
25
GAME

66.89

2018-10-24 Terre Haute, Ind.
Rose-Hulman
Earlham
1
3
23
25
25
22
24
26
22
25
GAME

66.86

2018-11-03 Lexington, Ky.
Earlham
Rose-Hulman
1
3
26
24
27
29
14
25
19
25
GAME

66.71

2018-10-19 Franklin, Ind.
Franklin
Bluffton
3
1
26
24
27
25
21
25
25
23
GAME

65.82

2018-11-03 Lexington, Ky.
Transylvania
Bluffton
3
1
25
18
25
19
22
25
25
22
GAME

65.49

2018-10-06 Bluffton, Ohio
Bluffton
Rose-Hulman
3
1
21
25
25
12
25
17
25
19
GAME

65.39

2018-10-03 Hanover, Ind.
Hanover
Transylvania
2
3
25
16
11
25
23
25
25
19
5
15

HuskerGeek HCAC All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 25.3347
2 21.2632
3 20.1052
4 19.5298
5 19.5035
6 18.0340
7 17.7195
8 16.2760
9 15.6170
10 14.7889

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 16.4693
2 11.8783
3 11.8047
4 11.6839
5 9.9526
6 9.7610
7 9.4662
8 8.9854
9 8.8786
10 8.8350

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 18.4071
2 16.3808
3 15.1413
4 14.4061
5 12.4529
6 12.1369
7 12.0199
8 9.9898
9 9.4585
10 8.8654

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2667
2 0.2192
3 0.2120
4 0.2011
5 0.1953
6 0.1879
7 0.1816
8 0.1772
9 0.1750
10 0.1720

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1734
2 0.1291
3 0.1217
4 0.1201
5 0.1168
6 0.1135
7 0.1109
8 0.1064
9 0.0998
10 0.0995

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1905
2 0.1841
3 0.1586
4 0.1577
5 0.1549
6 0.1414
7 0.1379
8 0.1354
9 0.1165
10 0.1128


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek