Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,724.7831

Football ohio st 10.8908
Ice Hockey michigan 5.0000
Men's Soccer marshall 10.0965
Women's Soccer penn st 9.9817
Women's Volleyball wisconsin 12.7753
Field Hockey northwestern 9.9036

HCAC - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Transylvania 1,629.3647 1,623.5891 1,626.4743 64.46 58.65 0.292
2nd Mt. St. Joseph 1,597.9463 1,597.9221 1,597.9342 63.45 55.33 0.234
3rd Hanover 1,489.0503 1,487.4294 1,488.2396 58.89 50.39 0.145
4th Rose-Hulman 1,448.2808 1,446.7860 1,447.5332 58.68 49.98 0.112
5th Manchester 1,416.4152 1,414.1402 1,415.2773 56.36 44.37 0.068
6th Earlham 1,389.4408 1,387.9892 1,388.7148 58.43 46.07 0.043
7th Franklin 1,367.1158 1,362.6545 1,364.8833 54.04 46.54 0.042
8th Anderson (IN) 1,353.8340 1,346.4316 1,350.1277 56.66 45.49 0.021
9th Bluffton 1,287.6600 1,286.7978 1,287.2288 54.92 40.56 -0.053
10th Defiance 1,267.0981 1,264.7668 1,265.9319 52.81 40.67 -0.069

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Transylvania 0.3374 45.90 12.17 42.79 40.84 3.96 10.96
2nd Mt. St. Joseph 0.2634 39.33 12.99 35.35 46.19 2.53 12.32
3rd Hanover 0.2370 36.55 12.86 33.44 48.66 3.29 8.26
4th Rose-Hulman 0.2124 34.20 12.97 31.47 53.83 3.68 10.32
5th Franklin 0.1916 34.90 15.74 32.44 50.61 2.81 8.68
6th Manchester 0.1842 36.68 18.26 33.06 47.68 5.11 9.13
7th Earlham 0.1780 33.85 16.05 31.19 51.46 3.83 11.27
8th Anderson (IN) 0.1620 31.35 15.15 29.27 53.67 3.96 9.52
9th Bluffton 0.1402 32.56 18.54 28.80 51.92 4.35 10.27
10th Defiance 0.1328 30.60 17.33 27.66 55.60 4.92 9.25

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Mt. St. Joseph 0.0290 21.15 18.26 19.92 64.98 5.13 4.35
2nd Transylvania 0.0453 24.47 19.94 24.09 61.20 5.60 7.27
3rd Hanover 0.0922 25.69 16.47 24.19 58.53 5.70 6.51
4th Rose-Hulman 0.1009 25.70 15.61 24.10 60.95 4.78 7.78
5th Manchester 0.1162 28.70 17.08 26.03 57.41 6.14 8.09
6th Earlham 0.1347 30.10 16.63 27.59 56.17 4.27 8.29
7th Anderson (IN) 0.1405 28.34 14.30 26.56 58.92 3.47 9.33
8th Franklin 0.1499 32.40 17.41 29.87 52.56 4.96 11.37
9th Bluffton 0.1936 34.96 15.60 29.69 49.85 4.24 8.73
10th Defiance 0.2014 34.94 14.80 32.76 52.79 3.03 12.21

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,423.2345 1,417.4924 1,409.1293 1,404.1022 1,413.4896
Difference -5.7421 -14.1052 -19.1324 -12.9932

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Transylvania 60 1,400 777 113 114 55.50 12.4 12.3 1,237 594 103 101 51.98 12.0 12.2
Mt. St. Joseph 49 1,140 640 111 97 56.14 10.3 11.8 1,013 511 58 90 49.56 17.5 11.3
Hanover 61 1,410 812 106 98 57.59 13.3 14.4 1,219 635 95 124 47.91 12.8 9.8
Manchester 56 1,160 649 115 103 55.95 10.1 11.3 1,101 618 105 128 43.87 10.5 8.6
Rose-Hulman 63 1,326 726 116 142 54.75 11.4 9.3 1,350 742 120 134 45.04 11.3 10.1
Anderson (IN) 54 1,164 649 100 110 55.76 11.6 10.6 1,217 693 118 84 43.06 10.3 14.5
Franklin 61 1,177 629 96 102 53.44 12.3 11.5 1,230 681 149 126 44.63 8.3 9.8
Earlham 68 1,383 742 130 132 53.65 10.6 10.5 1,554 899 151 156 42.15 10.3 10.0
Bluffton 73 1,295 699 142 131 53.98 9.1 9.9 1,490 905 158 127 39.26 9.4 11.7
Defiance 46 852 434 67 103 50.94 12.7 8.3 1,074 663 132 109 38.27 8.1 9.9
Conference Average 59 1,231 676 110 113 54.77 11.4 11.0 1,249 694 119 118 44.57 11.0 10.8
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the HCAC

HuskerGeek HCAC All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 14.9956
2 12.5408
3 11.3815
4 10.6544
5 10.2035
6 9.8954
7 9.8313
8 9.8147
9 9.7177
10 9.5372

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 9.4996
2 6.4388
3 6.3252
4 6.1763
5 5.5813
6 5.2778
7 5.1906
8 5.0808
9 5.0225
10 4.8804

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 13.4518
2 9.2145
3 8.6737
4 8.2431
5 8.0380
6 7.9229
7 7.8799
8 7.8324
9 6.3006
10 5.9850

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2499
2 0.2001
3 0.1991
4 0.1929
5 0.1928
6 0.1888
7 0.1822
8 0.1706
9 0.1691
10 0.1682

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1583
2 0.1085
3 0.1073
4 0.1059
5 0.1035
6 0.1029
7 0.1004
8 0.0921
9 0.0886
10 0.0861

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.2135
2 0.1598
3 0.1585
4 0.1576
5 0.1511
6 0.1446
7 0.1386
8 0.1268
9 0.1151
10 0.1080


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek